We Did It!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#76
Originally posted by sharkster
Hey as much as Lambos make the panties drop (credit where credit is due), I've raced a couple of Diablos (modded) and Murci and neither kept up well (check racingflix.com. They're more for show than go. A guy here we know tried to play the modding game with his Diablo. They just don't adapt well to that kind of stuff... Also I don't think they were ever intended to be tracked or anything like that. Too heavy and sloppy in terms of handling....
Hey as much as Lambos make the panties drop (credit where credit is due), I've raced a couple of Diablos (modded) and Murci and neither kept up well (check racingflix.com. They're more for show than go. A guy here we know tried to play the modding game with his Diablo. They just don't adapt well to that kind of stuff... Also I don't think they were ever intended to be tracked or anything like that. Too heavy and sloppy in terms of handling....
I do agree some lambos aren't as fast straight line as you, but honestly my dads Gallardo would kill your TT in the twisties (along with mine)... The car is just amazing in the handling department!!!
Evan
#77
Originally posted by allanlambo
Dont adapt well to mods? LOL
Just changing the exhaust, loses 100pds, and adds 40rwhp.
Dont adapt well to mods? LOL
Just changing the exhaust, loses 100pds, and adds 40rwhp.
Evan i think that drivers being equal tt vs gallardo stock for stock they are equal in terms of handling round the "twisties". Why would the Gallordo be so much better?
all the best
adam
#78
Originally posted by mehrabani1
This has to be the best thread ever...
This has to be the best thread ever...
guys please don't fight, ^^
#79
Originally posted by AMG ETR
Alex,
I do agree some lambos aren't as fast straight line as you, but honestly my dads Gallardo would kill your TT in the twisties (along with mine)... The car is just amazing in the handling department!!!
Evan
Alex,
I do agree some lambos aren't as fast straight line as you, but honestly my dads Gallardo would kill your TT in the twisties (along with mine)... The car is just amazing in the handling department!!!
Evan
How do you think a Gallardo would do against KA in the twisties?
#81
Originally posted by AMG ETR
Alex,
I do agree some lambos aren't as fast straight line as you, but honestly my dads Gallardo would kill your TT in the twisties (along with mine)... The car is just amazing in the handling department!!!
Evan
Alex,
I do agree some lambos aren't as fast straight line as you, but honestly my dads Gallardo would kill your TT in the twisties (along with mine)... The car is just amazing in the handling department!!!
Evan
I think the stock suspension on the TT is pretty sloppy for the kind of car it is. PSS9s, JICs etc... bring it to where it should be.
#83
Originally posted by cjv
sharkster,
How do you think a Gallardo would do against KA in the twisties?
sharkster,
How do you think a Gallardo would do against KA in the twisties?
Sorry you had to be there. Chad decided the put his JRZ's to work during a drive and spared the bird....
#84
Originally posted by sharkster
40rwhp? Um... without retuning, and without going to straight pipes?? Hmm seems like it'd take more than just "changing" the exhaust but heck if I know. Show us the dyno proof hehe.
40rwhp? Um... without retuning, and without going to straight pipes?? Hmm seems like it'd take more than just "changing" the exhaust but heck if I know. Show us the dyno proof hehe.
#87
Originally posted by sharkster
OK just wondering because we know how everyone likes dyno proof. That 40rwhp number must have come from somewhere...
OK just wondering because we know how everyone likes dyno proof. That 40rwhp number must have come from somewhere...
Funny how one can say that from that kind of power gain it tells you alot about the base car. I guess 996TT's should of all come from the factory with better programming, bigger turbos, exhausts, better blow off valves, headers, intercoolers etc etc.
#88
Got this off another board:
LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO PERFORMANCE DATABASE
0-60MPH
3.5 - Motor Trend (USA)
3.6 - Auto (Italy)
3.6 - Automobilismo (Italy)
3.6 - Road and Track (USA)
3.6 - Top Gear (UK)
3.7 - Auto Motor und Sport (Germany)
3.8 - Car and Driver (USA)
3.9 - Sport Auto (Germany)
0-100MPH (160KPH)
8.7 - Road and Track (USA)
8.8 - Top Gear (UK)
8.9 - Sport Auto (Germany)
QUARTER MILE
11.5 @ 124.3mph - Auto (Italy)
11.5 @ 123.4mph - Automobilismo (Italy)
11.7 @ 122.5mph - Motor Trend (USA)
11.8 @ 121.2mph - Auto Motor und Sport (Germany)
12.0 @ 121.0mph - Road and Track (USA)
12.3 @ 120.3mph - Top Gear (UK)
STANDING MILE
30.5 @ 169.2mph - Motor Trend (USA)
STANDING KILOMETER
20.9 @ 158.6mph - Auto (Italy)
21.0 @ 155.2mph - Automobilismo (Italy)
21.4 @ 156.0mph - Auto Motor und Sport (Germany)
MISCELLANEOUS TRACK TIMES
7:50 - Nurburgring, Sport Auto (Germany)
1:12.0 - Hockenheim, Sport Auto (Germany)
BEST MOTORING - FUJI TRACK TIME
1:38.6 - Ferrari F50
1:39.8 - Porsche 996 GT2
1:39.8 - Lamborghini Murcielago
1:43.4 - Porsche 996 C4S
BEST MOTORING - TWIN RING MOTEGI TRACK TIME
1:40.9 - Ferrari 360 Modena
1:40.4 - Porsche 996 911 Turbo
1:39.6 - BMW M3 CSL
1:36.9 - Honda NSX Type-R
1:36.6 - Lamborghini Murcielago
1:36.0 - Lamborghini Gallardo
0-100MPH-0
12.7 - Motor Trend (USA)
AUTO MOTOR UND SPORT - NARDO SHOOTOUT
205.1mph - Top Speed
12.5 - 0-200kph
37.6 - 0-300kph
696ft. - 150mph to 0mph (braking)
LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO PERFORMANCE DATABASE
0-60MPH
3.5 - Motor Trend (USA)
3.6 - Auto (Italy)
3.6 - Automobilismo (Italy)
3.6 - Road and Track (USA)
3.6 - Top Gear (UK)
3.7 - Auto Motor und Sport (Germany)
3.8 - Car and Driver (USA)
3.9 - Sport Auto (Germany)
0-100MPH (160KPH)
8.7 - Road and Track (USA)
8.8 - Top Gear (UK)
8.9 - Sport Auto (Germany)
QUARTER MILE
11.5 @ 124.3mph - Auto (Italy)
11.5 @ 123.4mph - Automobilismo (Italy)
11.7 @ 122.5mph - Motor Trend (USA)
11.8 @ 121.2mph - Auto Motor und Sport (Germany)
12.0 @ 121.0mph - Road and Track (USA)
12.3 @ 120.3mph - Top Gear (UK)
STANDING MILE
30.5 @ 169.2mph - Motor Trend (USA)
STANDING KILOMETER
20.9 @ 158.6mph - Auto (Italy)
21.0 @ 155.2mph - Automobilismo (Italy)
21.4 @ 156.0mph - Auto Motor und Sport (Germany)
MISCELLANEOUS TRACK TIMES
7:50 - Nurburgring, Sport Auto (Germany)
1:12.0 - Hockenheim, Sport Auto (Germany)
BEST MOTORING - FUJI TRACK TIME
1:38.6 - Ferrari F50
1:39.8 - Porsche 996 GT2
1:39.8 - Lamborghini Murcielago
1:43.4 - Porsche 996 C4S
BEST MOTORING - TWIN RING MOTEGI TRACK TIME
1:40.9 - Ferrari 360 Modena
1:40.4 - Porsche 996 911 Turbo
1:39.6 - BMW M3 CSL
1:36.9 - Honda NSX Type-R
1:36.6 - Lamborghini Murcielago
1:36.0 - Lamborghini Gallardo
0-100MPH-0
12.7 - Motor Trend (USA)
AUTO MOTOR UND SPORT - NARDO SHOOTOUT
205.1mph - Top Speed
12.5 - 0-200kph
37.6 - 0-300kph
696ft. - 150mph to 0mph (braking)
#89
Originally posted by allanlambo
Their have been cars dynoed before, i just dont have the sheets from the results. I can tell you from experience the difference is night and day.
Funny how one can say that from that kind of power gain it tells you alot about the base car. I guess 996TT's should of all come from the factory with better programming, bigger turbos, exhausts, better blow off valves, headers, intercoolers etc etc.
Their have been cars dynoed before, i just dont have the sheets from the results. I can tell you from experience the difference is night and day.
Funny how one can say that from that kind of power gain it tells you alot about the base car. I guess 996TT's should of all come from the factory with better programming, bigger turbos, exhausts, better blow off valves, headers, intercoolers etc etc.