Diverter Valve - which is best?
lol, I would be mad if I went through all this and no mp. maybe just a novelty thing.
is a single vent out the top more efficient than duals recirculated? hmm..... do you think porsche would have designed it with a single if they could get away with it? two for the price of one.
is a single vent out the top more efficient than duals recirculated? hmm..... do you think porsche would have designed it with a single if they could get away with it? two for the price of one.
Look at any aftermarket tuner for any turbo car. I have never heard of anyone designing a BOV setup to purposefully recirculate the air. I personally think throttle response is better, but have no hard data to back that up.
The reason greman cars(Auid,VW,Porsche) use a recirculating valve is due to the fact that we use a mass air flow sensor as our air metering device. Once that air is measured by the MAF it cant be expelled without throwing off the ecu.
Most Japanese cars use a MAP( manifold absolute pressure) sensor isntead of a MAF sensor, so expelling this air isnt an issue.
Obviously, you can run a BOV, but as mentioned above, it cuases a rich condition between shifts, at best. ive heard of ppl having major driveability problems using vent to atmosphere valves.
Most Japanese cars use a MAP( manifold absolute pressure) sensor isntead of a MAF sensor, so expelling this air isnt an issue.
Obviously, you can run a BOV, but as mentioned above, it cuases a rich condition between shifts, at best. ive heard of ppl having major driveability problems using vent to atmosphere valves.
I have the EVOMS DVs.
Typically atmosphere venting causes driveability issues on street cars with MAF type metering systems. I've experienced issues on some of my previous cars whereas some it didn't matter vented or recirc'ed (different tolerances in the ECU programming plays a role too). If the air flow is measured in front of the turbo's compressor, I'd probably recirc to maintain driveability/spool. If using a MAP or speed density type metering system, I'd vent away.
Typically atmosphere venting causes driveability issues on street cars with MAF type metering systems. I've experienced issues on some of my previous cars whereas some it didn't matter vented or recirc'ed (different tolerances in the ECU programming plays a role too). If the air flow is measured in front of the turbo's compressor, I'd probably recirc to maintain driveability/spool. If using a MAP or speed density type metering system, I'd vent away.
Here is the link http://www.turbo911.com/showthread.php?t=287
It took me about 2 hrs. Now that I have done it, it would take me about 1:15.
Good luck!!
Call Dan @ Vivid for pricing. No way for it to fit in stock location, so I tore out all of the hoses and the solenoid that were back there and just rigged a single BOV to the outlet on the Y-pipe using a 90deg silicone hose reducer. Works great. Have to reroute some vacuum lines and plug the port on the intake plenum where the f-pipe connected to. Not a big deal.
Oh yeah, I am running 50/50, half gets recirc and half psshh to the outside.
Got mine to fit in the stock location too.......Cohare are you running that screwed on cap on or off? I see Jimmers is on, i took mine off, just curious which way you are running it and if there is any difference?
I have Bailey's and I can hear them about 60% of the time when i let off the gas after having some boost. It's not loud like a vented BOV, but it is distinct.
I had my DVs replaced with Bailey DVs...under warranty. The mechanic did the job in about 45 minutes. He did remove and rotate the top of one of the DVs to make the installation easier...



