60-130 in 5.73...on 93 octane - Page 2 - 6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource

Apr 30, 2008 | 04:30 PM

#16

Divexxtreme

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 8,509

From: Virginia, USA

Rep Power: 789

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ'sZ

Thats an incredible time...congrats...still think the Z06 with it's gearing and RWD could hang, given the same HP as the P-car...??

This is the point I was trying to make a couple weeks ago. I think the 60-130 the P-cars are in their element for short times..again awesome run...!!

Yes, I think with the same power and the ability to put it to the ground effectively...the Z would be faster.

I still can't get over the fact that I ran 7.86 in a bone stock 443 rwhp car.

Apr 30, 2008 | 04:32 PM

#17

Divexxtreme

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 8,509

From: Virginia, USA

Rep Power: 789

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOODTSTER

That is insane!!

I think your car will really like the MS109 with a splash of C16.

Great runs, thanks for sharing.

MK

MS109. That's the stuff I was talking about (when I mistakingly said "VP109")! Thanks, Marty.

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:11 PM

#18

LUISGT3

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 16,073

From: Minneapolis, Mn

Rep Power: 1071

That car is out of this world.

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:19 PM

#19

Divexxtreme

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 8,509

From: Virginia, USA

Rep Power: 789

Quote:

Originally Posted by LUISGT3

That car is out of this world.

Wow! Thanks, Luis!

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:21 PM

#20

jags911tt

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 3,771

From: Seattle WA

Rep Power: 225

Just amazing Scott!

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:23 PM

#21

TXGold

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 1,817

From: Houston, TX

Rep Power: 238

Jesus. 7.89 and then this. Way to go Scott!!!

I would love to see the difference in some times with a 2.99% decline and then a ~0% gradient.

Keep rockin in the free world.

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:24 PM

#22

LUISGT3

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 16,073

From: Minneapolis, Mn

Rep Power: 1071

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divexxtreme

Wow! Thanks, Luis!

You are ceirtanly welcome. I spent some time around Marty's car this past weekend and I love the "sleeper" look with some nice suspension and wheels that you both have. I had some big plans for my next car and keeping it "sleeper" is now one of them.

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:34 PM

#23

Divexxtreme

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 8,509

From: Virginia, USA

Rep Power: 789

Jags and Ryan - Thanks!

Luis - I'm with you. I really prefer the sleeper look as well.

I'm honestly more excited about this time than I am my 4.74. It seems that there's a point of diminishing returns the higher you go with boost. Traction is an issue, octane is an issue, stress on components is an issue. Anyway, I really like how the car feels on unleaded...so it's great to know that I can still run a relatively quick time without having to run mucho-boost on leaded fuel.

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:39 PM

#24

markski@markskituning

Basic Sponsor

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 9,730

From: CHICAGO

Rep Power: 604

that is fast Scott... at .9 bars wow...

hey if you ever get a chance can u run a 1/4 on the street with a easy launch... Im interested in the trap speed. it should be in the mid 130s...
If you ever can that be great for comparison purposes...
Mark

__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:44 PM

#25

Divexxtreme

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 8,509

From: Virginia, USA

Rep Power: 789

Quote:

Originally Posted by MARKSKI

Mark,

Sure. Based on my previous best trap of 136 when I was 580-600 rwhp, I think I can trap in the high130's/low 140's at .9 - 1.0 BAR with this setup on a good weather day....on 93.

Apr 30, 2008 | 05:52 PM

#26

John D

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,293

From: Northeast US

Rep Power: 82

Scott, That's awesome on everyday 93 octane...nice!

Are you going to do a high octane, high boost trap speed test any time soon? I hoping you get thrown out for lack of a parachute (150+mph)!

Apr 30, 2008 | 06:00 PM

#27

Divexxtreme

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 8,509

From: Virginia, USA

Rep Power: 789

Quote:

Originally Posted by John D

Scott, That's awesome on everyday 93 octane...nice!

Are you going to do a high octane, high boost trap speed test any time soon? I hoping you get thrown out for lack of a parachute (150+mph)!

Thanks, John!

I really want to. I'm hoping to attend a MIR track rental before it gets too hot. Worst case I'll wait until later this year when it starts to cool down.

There was a track rental at Richmond last week (closer to me than MIR) , but the track ends very quickly after the traps for a 150 mph car (not to mention my car was down from a leaky OEM passenger-side radiator, which I finally fixed a couple of days ago). Anyway, MIR has plenty of room after the traps to safely slow down, so I'd really prefer to go there.

I would LOVE to trap 150+.

Last edited by Divexxtreme; Apr 30, 2008 at 09:15 PM.

Apr 30, 2008 | 08:07 PM

#28

robmd99

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 3,597

From: Texas

Rep Power: 205

All my runs are done on MS109. I asked about using C16 on my car and Todd said I could run more boost but this might not equate to more power? Never thought about mixing the two gases?? If your car is tuned on C16 can you use MS109? If I remember vaquely that this might not be possible?
Great runs
Robert