996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Front/ rear tire diameter tolerance

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2003 | 08:25 PM
  #1  
ebaker's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 910
From: TX, USA
Rep Power: 59
ebaker is infamous around these parts
Front/ rear tire diameter tolerance

Does anyone know the maximum official factory F/R tire OD difference? I think I read it was 4% but I'd like someone to confirm that. Is there a way to get tech info like this directly from Porsche without going through the dealer?
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 10:14 AM
  #2  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,439
Rep Power: 87
Joe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to behold
4% sounds way too high...

Hi. I highly doubt that a 4% difference in front-rear tire
diameters is within tolerance. I don't recall ever seeing
Porsche publish a specification on this. You can infer an
acceptible range by reading the specs of the OEM tires
that Porsche suppliies with the car. The difference in
diameter of the Pirellis is closer to .4%.
Make sure you judge tires by their detailed specs, not
just the 225/40/18 numbers, because those latter ones
are *approximate*. I have seen two tires, both spec'ed
as 245/45/16 be over a quarter inch different in diameter,
and these tires were both made by the same manufacturer!
They were just different tire types (one was an all-season,
and one was more for dry).
Joe
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #3  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
I understand officially it is 1%. I understand people have successfully run close to 3%.
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 10:25 AM
  #4  
Ken's Avatar
Ken
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,638
From: Carlsbad
Rep Power: 131
Ken is a jewel in the roughKen is a jewel in the roughKen is a jewel in the roughKen is a jewel in the rough
If you use the tire size spreadsheet you get diameters:

225 / 40 R 18 25.087
285 / 30 R 18 24.732

that's a front to rear difference of 0.014 or 1.4% from the factory. I haven't gone out and measured, but that should be close enough.

I'm putting 19" wheels on and am making sure I'm within that tolerance. I think with 4 wheel drive, front to rear ratios might be pretty important
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 10:43 AM
  #5  
KPV's Avatar
KPV
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,343
From: New Jersey
Rep Power: 199
KPV is just really niceKPV is just really niceKPV is just really niceKPV is just really nice
Joe,
I agree.

cjv,
Where did you come upon this info?

Ken,
You are doing what Joe said not to do. There are inaccuracies in your method of comparison.

The bottom line is that the difference in rotational velocities of the front and rear wheels should not be more than those of the stock configuration. This is certainly the most conservative approach. Since the rotational velocity is directly proportional to tire circumference which is also directly proportional to wheel diameter (C=Pi x d), the ratio of front to rear factory tire diameters should be maintained. The best way to make the comparison is to obtain the specific tire diameters from the manufacturer of the factory tires and determine the ratio of diameters front/rear. Make sure your new setup does not violate this ratio. In actuality, unless I am overlooking something, the viscous coupling cannot tell forward from backward relative motion and therefore if the front/rear or rear/front ratio is comparable to the factory tire specs you should be OK. The enemy is heat. The bigger the difference in tire diameters, and hence rotational velocities, the more "slip" has to occur in the VC. The more slip, the more heat. The more heat, the more potential for wear and damage.

Of course all of this assumes you are operating at correct tire pressures. If you are running substantially lower pressures, the "apparent" diameter will be smaller.

Incidentally, Yokohama AVS Sports have the following actual diameters:
235/35/19=646mm (compared to the spreadsheet value of 647.1)
315/25/19-640mm (compared to the spreadsheet value of 640.1)
 

Last edited by KPV; Sep 1, 2003 at 10:57 AM.
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #6  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,439
Rep Power: 87
Joe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to behold
Audi used to beneficially play with front-rear diameter
differences to get different power balance, when they
raced a lot of AWD. Note that this *does* stress the
front-to-rear differential.
To clarify: A tire manufacturer provides *two* numerical
specifications for it's tire. The first is the standard form on
the tire wall "285 / 30 R 18" etc. THIS IS APPROXIMATE.
The second spec is the spec sheet, which TireRack or your
dealer should have. This will typically include a count of
revolutions per mile. THIS IS THE MOST ACCURATE measure
of actual rolling diameter.
Joe
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 11:13 AM
  #7  
KPV's Avatar
KPV
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,343
From: New Jersey
Rep Power: 199
KPV is just really niceKPV is just really niceKPV is just really niceKPV is just really nice
Joe,
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 11:25 AM
  #8  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
The information regarding the 1% was obtained from a dealer. He refered me to the two acceptable tires used by Porsche. They fall in the 1% range. The other percent is derived from what I have seen others successfully try without encountering any problems over some extended driving.

The upper figure I believe was also given by Viken on the Rennlist form. He did have some additional back up. You might ask him this question and the reference for his information.
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #9  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,439
Rep Power: 87
Joe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to behold
Originally posted by cjv
The other percent is derived from what I have seen others successfully try without encountering any problems over some extended driving.
This brings up an interesting question: When/if the front-to-rear
viscous differential fails, what is the mode or modes of failure, and
the symptoms?
For instance, if the unit merely stops transferring any power to/
from the front wheels, it might not be detected by a driver until
AWD was necessary.
 
Old Sep 1, 2003 | 12:00 PM
  #10  
Ken's Avatar
Ken
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,638
From: Carlsbad
Rep Power: 131
Ken is a jewel in the roughKen is a jewel in the roughKen is a jewel in the roughKen is a jewel in the rough
let's make this even simpler. If I stack all four wheels/tires in one pile and they're all the same size, then I'm ok???
 
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #11  
ebaker's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 910
From: TX, USA
Rep Power: 59
ebaker is infamous around these parts
Does anyone know how to get a definite answer from Porsche?
 
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 10:34 PM
  #12  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Ken,

If all the tires were the same size you would be OK from the rolling point of view.
 
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 10:39 PM
  #13  
msindi's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,395
From: Dubai, UAE + London, UK
Rep Power: 358
msindi is infamous around these parts
Ok - now I am really confused...looking at the following link http://www.conti-online.com/generato...tasheet_en.pdf
what fronts would be within the recommended tolerance to go with the 295/30 19 rears?? (i think mine are off!!) what about for the 315/25 19 rears??
thanx
 

Last edited by msindi; Sep 2, 2003 at 10:41 PM.
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 10:58 PM
  #14  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,439
Rep Power: 87
Joe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to behold
The 235/35/19s would match the 295s fairly closely
at 808 rpm vs. 805, and the 225/35/19s would match
the 315s exactly at 825 rpm.
 
Old Sep 2, 2003 | 11:01 PM
  #15  
msindi's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,395
From: Dubai, UAE + London, UK
Rep Power: 358
msindi is infamous around these parts
There are two 235/35 thogh...how do I know which ones I have??
Can you do the 819 235s with the 315?? I dont think 225 would look good IMO!
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 AM.