996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Stock market vs your car

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #16  
waymegelli's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 136
From: Texas
Rep Power: 27
waymegelli is a jewel in the roughwaymegelli is a jewel in the roughwaymegelli is a jewel in the roughwaymegelli is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by audikp
yea, this market isnt helping the value of these cars.....auction prices keep getting lower...heres an example:

63k 2001 996tt....$39,800
43k 2001 996tt....$39,250
19k 2001 996tt....$44,750
Thanks to audikp, I apparently lost more percentage of car value than I thought yesterday. BUT I also gained more today! What a wide riding market. I'll be glad when the election is over.
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 02:02 PM
  #17  
pkts's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 16
From: LA, CA
Rep Power: 0
pkts is infamous around these parts
I agree Robert however the insurance is only as good as the solvency of the FDIC. They used up around 20-25% of their deposits on IndyMac and that was a while back. Of course, the gov will just print more money to give them.

But I don't trust any bank right now. 95% of my money is in brokerage firms...no, not Etrade

The ONLY thing I find comforting (financially speaking) these days is that the dollar is actually acting quite well. Oh, and maybe I'll be able to pick up a 996 turbo for 40K....make that 35.
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 02:34 PM
  #18  
maxwell's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,825
From: DC
Rep Power: 98
maxwell is a jewel in the roughmaxwell is a jewel in the roughmaxwell is a jewel in the rough
fwiw, no one should have more than 100k sitting in cash, whether it's insured or not. Even when interest rates are at 1% or so, in a money market, or 2% in a short term bond, that's still better than sitting in cash....and then they're 100% insured.

Unfortunately, I think a lot of people think that anything not in equities is "cash".
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #19  
robertp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,272
From: California
Rep Power: 161
robertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud of
Cash in a cd getting 4% interest risk free (is what I ment). Nothing wrong with having no risk cd's as long as you have other investments with higher yield and higher risks. I am just sayig that I can insure a lot of money in one bank and do not need to have 15 banks insure my cash.
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #20  
MY996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,119
From: Bay Area
Rep Power: 229
MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by maxwell
fwiw, no one should have more than 100k sitting in cash, whether it's insured or not. Even when interest rates are at 1% or so, in a money market, or 2% in a short term bond, that's still better than sitting in cash....and then they're 100% insured.

Unfortunately, I think a lot of people think that anything not in equities is "cash".
Disagree... in the bear market, you should be sitting on a good % of cash.
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #21  
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 673
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
Why would I let 100K sit in cash when I can let it sit in a risk free cd....even if it is a sh*t 2.5% rate?
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #22  
MY996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,119
From: Bay Area
Rep Power: 229
MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by robertp
One thing I hate hearing is when these high end financial analysts on TV/radio state "if you have over $100,000 parked at one bank the monies above $100,000 are at risk (not FDIC Insured)". That is a bunch of bull. Since I have three kids, my wife and I have $1.5 million at one bank and the entire sum is FDIC insured. If you understand the FDIC insurance schema, you can maximize your coverage and thus, minimize your exposure. I only recomend doing this at one of the largest banks (BofA, Wells Fargo)
And if you and your wife's names are on the account, it is $100,000 per person.
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #23  
MY996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,119
From: Bay Area
Rep Power: 229
MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !MY996TT Is a GOD !
Liquidation is the key. Most CDs are restricted with a time window and cashing them prematurely will encounter a penalty. If you buy 12-month or a 6-month CDs and the economy recovers in like 4 months, you will be missing out the opportunity. I keep my money in my credit union saving account and getting 3+% interests… not much less than CDs; however, I can move my money any time without a penalty.
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #24  
robertp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,272
From: California
Rep Power: 161
robertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud of
No, risk free CD's can be shut down at any time.

A married couple with three children can have $1.5 million in one bank and %100 of it is FDIC insured.

Are you interested in learning how/why?
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #25  
robertp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,272
From: California
Rep Power: 161
robertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud of
See attached .jpg file.
 
Attached Images  

Last edited by robertp; Sep 30, 2008 at 04:53 PM.
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 05:43 PM
  #26  
steve harris's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,658
From: rocklin ca
Rep Power: 261
steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !steve harris Is a GOD !
i keep mine in intrest bearing coffie cans . maxwellhouse pays the best and is insuried to the last drop
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #27  
maxwell's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,825
From: DC
Rep Power: 98
maxwell is a jewel in the roughmaxwell is a jewel in the roughmaxwell is a jewel in the rough
Also, you can buy tax-free municipal bonds that expire every 7 days. That way your cash is never tied up for long. A lot of the confusion (not for the educated people here) but for the people that get their financial information from the 6 oclock news, think that cash means paper bills. The same way they think "bailout" means helping an overpaid CEO refinance his company.
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #28  
TraderHal's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,136
From: Baltimore Suburbs
Rep Power: 110
TraderHal is a glorious beacon of lightTraderHal is a glorious beacon of lightTraderHal is a glorious beacon of lightTraderHal is a glorious beacon of lightTraderHal is a glorious beacon of light
Im terrifed. Im starting to lose sleep.

They are proposing a securities trading tax of 0.25% on all stock transactions. To most it doesn't seem like a big deal . But for me it would be catastrophic.

Needless to say that would suck Traders who cant change their style are all dead.
 

Last edited by TraderHal; Sep 30, 2008 at 09:43 PM.
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #29  
TT Tommy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 959
From: San Clemente, Ca.
Rep Power: 58
TT Tommy is infamous around these parts
I hit the "sell" button on all of my stocks 3 months ago. Went to cash positions. Couldn't be happier. Cut out a lot of stress I don't need. Will probably jump back in soon (Thursday) if we get some bailout decisions.

tw
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #30  
pkts's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 16
From: LA, CA
Rep Power: 0
pkts is infamous around these parts
Hey Hal,

I trade too, though not your size Mostly futures. I heard about that fee. Hopefully won't pass! I swear, the dumbass ideas being floated in this market in the last 4 weeks just blow me away. Banning short selling on financials ??? What country are we in? That worked out real well....a week later we have a 8+% down day. Don't they realize that the shorties are buying on those terrible down days? Without them....we freefall. And now they want this tax. I thought market wanted greater liquidity? Can you imagine how much volume will decline if they enact that fee? Most of these politicians don't seem to realize that lower volume/liquidity = greater volatility.

Sheesh, what's next?

Good trading!
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.