996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Tell me what to say to Blouch turbo...

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #46  
M32's Avatar
M32
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,146
From: Houston, Tx
Rep Power: 86
M32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Powell
Edwin,
Honestly man it is all about how much money you want to spend and how much room you are going to want to have to upgrade. With the 16G's you are going to get away with the cheapest price but you are going to be stuck with no upgrade options. If you go with the 24/18s though you can set the boost lower and ALWAYS have an option to go bigger.

Regardless both of them will require you to get a new clutch, and they both require a 5bar FPR.

I have never driven either so I cannot tell you the difference in lag, but I have never heard a complaint from Paul about his 24/18s on his GT2, in fact by the time my GT30's spooled he was already out 2 cars on me, so that in itself says they spool pretty damn fast.

Honestly though do what YOU want to do because it is you that will be enjoying the car. See if Paul will take you for a ride in his GT2 so you can see how the lag (if there is any) is. I'd show ya the GT30s but then you'd be afraid of anything bigger than stock because there is a lot of lag LOL.

-Chris


Originally Posted by unvmym3
m32 , powell pretty much summed it up for you . there is very littl lag difference between the 18gs and the 16gs. i say do the 18s and dont look back you will be happy you did so.
Chris, thanks for the insightful post. You guys are killing me over here...
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #47  
ard's Avatar
ard
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,981
From: N. California
Rep Power: 298
ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !
I'm not sure I've ever driven my car and NOT had it over 100....



For a more efficient turbo, with lower lag, and better low end, would you guys recommend the zero clearance option no matter the size? Just curious...

A
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #48  
M32's Avatar
M32
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,146
From: Houston, Tx
Rep Power: 86
M32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ard
I'm not sure I've ever driven my car and NOT had it over 100....



For a more efficient turbo, with lower lag, and better low end, would you guys recommend the zero clearance option no matter the size? Just curious...

A


Btw, what's the "zero clearance option"? I've seen it mentioned a few times but am not sure what it is

Edwin
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 04:25 PM
  #49  
Onetime's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,034
From: Rancho Cucamonga
Rep Power: 118
Onetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant futureOnetime has a brilliant future
Let me add my two cents. I have the 16/16G setup. It's a great deal for the price. It's way faster than I need and for the most part I'm completely satisfied. I, like you, don't drive fast very often. However, I'll get into the throttle every now and then just to get it out of my system and I'm good.
Now the flipside. The only time I want more power is when I visit this site and see what others are doing. Then I start thinking, hmmm...more power. The quest for power is addicting. The big question is, can you be happy with the 16/16 turbos and having a crazy fast car or do you want the 24/18 turbos and have a stupid fast car?
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #50  
roadsterdoc's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,932
From: The Woodlands, TX
Rep Power: 107
roadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to behold
A few things that I want to address:

Rebuilding: SealG mentioned having the turbos rebuilt if they have over 10k miles. Blouch will inspect, disassemble, reassemble and balance them. If anything is not within spec (seals, bearings, etc) they will replace it (and bill you). THat being said, this never happens. The 996TT K16 and K24 turbos are super reliable and failures are virtually unheard of. Bottom line...there is really nothing to worry about with used K16 or K24 turbos.

EBC (Greddy or other): Don't listen to what anyone here says, talk to your tuner. If you are indeed going to use Todd at Protomotive, he will direct you the right way. He knows the setup and the tuning and what will work best for you. He already gave you his recommendation of turbo based soley on what you desire for the car. Do not listen to these here knuckleheads.

Which turbo: As above, go with Todd's recommendations. The K24/18Gs DO have more lag than the K16/16G setup and anyone telling you otherwise is clueless. Look at the mass and size of both turbine wheels and the size of both turbine housings. Physics is physics. People will say the tune will make a difference which is true, but in your case the tuner is the same so he will be able to exploit the virtues of each setup equally.

Porting and clipping the K16 turbine: Not necessary as it spools up great as is. Blouch knows their stuff. If it helped they would recommend it. Good for them for not taking your money to do something that will not benefit you.

Good luck!
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:01 PM
  #51  
ard's Avatar
ard
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,981
From: N. California
Rep Power: 298
ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Onetime
Let me add my two cents. I have the 16/16G setup. It's a great deal for the price. It's way faster than I need and for the most part I'm completely satisfied. I, like you, don't drive fast very often. However, I'll get into the throttle every now and then just to get it out of my system and I'm good.
Now the flipside. The only time I want more power is when I visit this site and see what others are doing. Then I start thinking, hmmm...more power. The quest for power is addicting. The big question is, can you be happy with the 16/16 turbos and having a crazy fast car or do you want the 24/18 turbos and have a stupid fast car?
And here we have the crux of the commercial value of these forums to the vendors and sponsors... it creates the perception that the reader is the only one 'not modding', and reduces the 'risk avoidance' behavior (ie common sense) that protects many owners from going down the mod path even thought it can be riskier and more espensive than many understand.

Me?

Guilty.

A
 
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #52  
ard's Avatar
ard
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,981
From: N. California
Rep Power: 298
ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by M32


Btw, what's the "zero clearance option"? I've seen it mentioned a few times but am not sure what it is

Edwin
A turbo is a fan. As air is forced into it (or is moved by the fan) any air leaking around the fan blades is 'wasted' and causes lag and loss of power.

When they are manufactured, there is a pretty tight fit between hosing and fan- but with zero clearance, they disassemble, spread epoxy inside the housing, assemble and spin- the blades shear off the wet epoxy- they disassemble, clean off the blades, let the epoxy cure then reassemble.

The result is an assembly with close to 'zero clearance' between blades and housing- higher efficiency and less lag.

To my thinking, there isn't a single reason NOT to have ZC... in other words they make whatever turbo you spec, better. No down side or trade off.

Personally I'd have Kevin at UMW build me turbos if I was upgrading- buy my K24s are fine for now. Definitely need a suspension change....

A
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 12:12 AM
  #53  
ReeknHavic's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,482
From: Kansas City
Rep Power: 122
ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !ReeknHavic Is a GOD !
I think what you're doing is smart. Ask a lot of questions, talk to people and hopefully get a few rides in modded cars. The problem a lot of people have is they know what they'd like but have very little experience to base their decision on. Morover, it's not so much that they don't have good info, rather it's that we can talk and try to offer our perceptions of our kits but until you experience it for yourself it doesn't paint the full picture. That said, go for a few rides in cars with different turbos and see what you like and don't like. You're not in a hurry to do anything so take your time and think things through. Regardless of what you eventually decide you'll need to put money away for a new clutch.....sooner or later. I say just take your time, remember to breathe (grin) and you'll be just fine. This forum is a gold mine for information and guys willing to bend over backwards to help you.
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 06:48 AM
  #54  
Bluecuda's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 107
From: Ohio
Rep Power: 23
Bluecuda is infamous around these parts
I'm by no means an expert, but Tym Switzer has really taken care of my TT. I had him upgrade the K16's to some kind of hybrid K16 (I didn't ask exactly what he did to them), and as soon as that was done we had to do the clutch. He couldn't even tune it on the dyno with the stock clutch.

All said and done, he achieved my goals of having a stupid fast car for hauling my butt back and forth to work, putting out 580rwhp. That's about max you can do on the stock fuel system, and I know people also say that K16s stop pulling at higher RPMs, too, but I'm too scared to look because I'm slammed back in the seat when I hit 100mph in 3rd.

My advice: Talk to a shop that's respectable, explain your goals, and let them put together a package for you. It should be painless except to your wallet!!! You will need a new clutch, too, btw.
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 07:37 AM
  #55  
M32's Avatar
M32
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,146
From: Houston, Tx
Rep Power: 86
M32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond reputeM32 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by roadsterdoc
A few things that I want to address:

Rebuilding: SealG mentioned having the turbos rebuilt if they have over 10k miles. Blouch will inspect, disassemble, reassemble and balance them. If anything is not within spec (seals, bearings, etc) they will replace it (and bill you). THat being said, this never happens. The 996TT K16 and K24 turbos are super reliable and failures are virtually unheard of. Bottom line...there is really nothing to worry about with used K16 or K24 turbos.

EBC (Greddy or other): Don't listen to what anyone here says, talk to your tuner. If you are indeed going to use Todd at Protomotive, he will direct you the right way. He knows the setup and the tuning and what will work best for you. He already gave you his recommendation of turbo based soley on what you desire for the car. Do not listen to these here knuckleheads.

Which turbo: As above, go with Todd's recommendations. The K24/18Gs DO have more lag than the K16/16G setup and anyone telling you otherwise is clueless. Look at the mass and size of both turbine wheels and the size of both turbine housings. Physics is physics. People will say the tune will make a difference which is true, but in your case the tuner is the same so he will be able to exploit the virtues of each setup equally.

Porting and clipping the K16 turbine: Not necessary as it spools up great as is. Blouch knows their stuff. If it helped they would recommend it. Good for them for not taking your money to do something that will not benefit you.

Good luck!
Thanks for the wise words Chris. I gave Akram a call and he's going to talk to Todd K about the K16 hybrid package. Hopefully I'll get something rolling by next month.

Did you open up the package for the bumper? Any first impressions?

Originally Posted by ard
A turbo is a fan. As air is forced into it (or is moved by the fan) any air leaking around the fan blades is 'wasted' and causes lag and loss of power.

When they are manufactured, there is a pretty tight fit between hosing and fan- but with zero clearance, they disassemble, spread epoxy inside the housing, assemble and spin- the blades shear off the wet epoxy- they disassemble, clean off the blades, let the epoxy cure then reassemble.

The result is an assembly with close to 'zero clearance' between blades and housing- higher efficiency and less lag.

To my thinking, there isn't a single reason NOT to have ZC... in other words they make whatever turbo you spec, better. No down side or trade off.

Personally I'd have Kevin at UMW build me turbos if I was upgrading- buy my K24s are fine for now. Definitely need a suspension change....

A
A,

Thanks for the turbo lesson... much appreciated. That makes sense. I'll have to ask Blouch about it when I send in the turbos.

Originally Posted by ReeknHavic
I think what you're doing is smart. Ask a lot of questions, talk to people and hopefully get a few rides in modded cars. The problem a lot of people have is they know what they'd like but have very little experience to base their decision on. Morover, it's not so much that they don't have good info, rather it's that we can talk and try to offer our perceptions of our kits but until you experience it for yourself it doesn't paint the full picture. That said, go for a few rides in cars with different turbos and see what you like and don't like. You're not in a hurry to do anything so take your time and think things through. Regardless of what you eventually decide you'll need to put money away for a new clutch.....sooner or later. I say just take your time, remember to breathe (grin) and you'll be just fine. This forum is a gold mine for information and guys willing to bend over backwards to help you.
You're right... there are a lot of guys here and locally that have been willing to help. I have to get on the good graces of some to ask for a ride in their K24/18 set up (anyone? ) and I have to find someone with the k16 hybrid set up locally, which I am not aware of anyone having that right now.

Originally Posted by Bluecuda
I'm by no means an expert, but Tym Switzer has really taken care of my TT. I had him upgrade the K16's to some kind of hybrid K16 (I didn't ask exactly what he did to them), and as soon as that was done we had to do the clutch. He couldn't even tune it on the dyno with the stock clutch.

All said and done, he achieved my goals of having a stupid fast car for hauling my butt back and forth to work, putting out 580rwhp. That's about max you can do on the stock fuel system, and I know people also say that K16s stop pulling at higher RPMs, too, but I'm too scared to look because I'm slammed back in the seat when I hit 100mph in 3rd.

My advice: Talk to a shop that's respectable, explain your goals, and let them put together a package for you. It should be painless except to your wallet!!! You will need a new clutch, too, btw.
WOW! 580rwhp on K16s? That's extremely impressive. How long have you been running that set-up? Any issues?

Thanks for the advice... I know that eventually, I'll need a new clutch but I am a little confused b/c both Todd K and Akram said I won't need a clutch just yet. Regardless, I'll be setting aside some funds to get the clutch replaced when the time comes.

Edwin
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 07:48 AM
  #56  
Seal Grey Matte's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 982
From: NYC
Rep Power: 64
Seal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by Bluecuda
All said and done, he achieved my goals of having a stupid fast car for hauling my butt back and forth to work, putting out 580rwhp.
What kind of dyno is that and what does a stock car baseline at on that dyno?
From what I have seen, the limit of the stock fuel system is 600crank.

EDIT: Found it. https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/1952434-post1.html
Your car dyno'd 383RWHP stock on a dynojet, so doing the math on that, it's about 612hp crank, so I think we're talking the same power level as limit of the stock fuel system.
 

Last edited by Seal Grey Matte; Nov 18, 2008 at 08:22 AM.
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 02:41 PM
  #57  
Bluecuda's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 107
From: Ohio
Rep Power: 23
Bluecuda is infamous around these parts
I have been running this setup for about 2 months, and haven't had any issues at all with the engine, tranny or clutch. I have had some issues with the suspension, though, but Tym is taking care of that for me right now!! Apparantly I like the twisties a little too much, and the stock struts just wouldn't hold. I kept bottoming out the rear, and knocked it out of alignment. Part of that is my driving, part is the crappy roads around here
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #58  
RickEager's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 523
From: A SoCal Canyon
Rep Power: 58
RickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond repute
I actually removed the ECU myself and sent it to Todd at Protomotive. He quickly got it back to me via FedEx overnight... twice! The second time he reprogramed it for the factory solenoid when I removed the Greddy... Todd's a great guy!

Originally Posted by Seal Grey Matte
If you're doing a Data log-e-mail-retune style tune, alot can go wrong on the "datalog" run as our forum member Rick Eager just found out.

Good luck.
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #59  
Seal Grey Matte's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 982
From: NYC
Rep Power: 64
Seal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to beholdSeal Grey Matte is a splendid one to behold
I didn't mean any slight against you or Todd or Proto. I was just trying to point out that alot can go wrong during the "shake-down" run on any new setup.
Best to have someone monitoring data real-time so they can pull the plug if things look suspect the first time you get on it.
 
Old Nov 18, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #60  
RickEager's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 523
From: A SoCal Canyon
Rep Power: 58
RickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond reputeRickEager has a reputation beyond repute
Excellent advice indeed!
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 AM.