Another good reason to have an AFR guage .. .
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 712
From: Akron, OH
Rep Power: 58
Another good reason to have an AFR guage .. .
Fuse holder for my inline 044.... MMM toasty.
Can't believe I did not have a fire. The only thing I think it could be was the hot pole of the fuse was grounded to the y pipe. The wiring work looks really nice, taped fully wrapped and soldered on all connections.
This happened quite a while ago by the looks of it, and the lack of smell.
Brockway and fire extinguisher here I come!
Can't believe I did not have a fire. The only thing I think it could be was the hot pole of the fuse was grounded to the y pipe. The wiring work looks really nice, taped fully wrapped and soldered on all connections.
This happened quite a while ago by the looks of it, and the lack of smell.
Brockway and fire extinguisher here I come!
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
I noticed there's a .6 -.7 spread between the gauges? Is this consistant? Which one do you trust more if one is reading 11.7 and one is reading 12.4 under boost?
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 81
From: MD
Rep Power: 21
For a WBO2, is there a way to display the AFM off the existing sensors? Do any of the gauges run off the OBD2 data?
I run innovate LC1s in my other cars, and it sorta seems a shame to replicate the sensor when they are already there.
I run innovate LC1s in my other cars, and it sorta seems a shame to replicate the sensor when they are already there.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 463
Rep Power: 44
The AEM reacts much faster than the Brockway and that's why it reads a bit different but under full boost they read the same.The AEM has a seperate sensor and the Brockway gets his information from the ECU and the AEM reacts for example 5 times a second and the Brockway 2 times a second.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
The AEM reacts much faster than the Brockway and that's why it reads a bit different but under full boost they read the same.The AEM has a seperate sensor and the Brockway gets his information from the ECU and the AEM reacts for example 5 times a second and the Brockway 2 times a second.
Trending Topics
Aem will read more accurately... the LM-1 is better then both...
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 712
From: Akron, OH
Rep Power: 58
hum I have not ordered the Brockway yet is it accurate enough to be a "street safety" gauge? I won't be using it for tuning, more as a all is "well in the universe" check.
Thanks, Tom
Thanks, Tom
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 463
Rep Power: 44
The Brockway is a little slower but he gets his data from the cars ecu so it will be fine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nick49
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
0
Aug 28, 2015 01:40 PM
