996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Boost question, yo.

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2011 | 09:25 PM
  #31  
raineycd's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,251
Rep Power: 166
raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by kwei
I understand, thanks for the info. I might not have mashed it as hard on the first pull, attached is a third pull I did.
Hmm. This pull looks a little different. Looks like timing got pulled around 4800 and then again at 5500. Also around 5200-5300 it looks a little leaner than normal.

You running 93oct?
 
Old Jul 10, 2011 | 09:40 PM
  #32  
kwei's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 611
From: Portland OR
Rep Power: 52
kwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by raineycd
Hmm. This pull looks a little different. Looks like timing got pulled around 4800 and then again at 5500. Also around 5200-5300 it looks a little leaner than normal.

You running 93oct?
we get 92 here from the premium pumps, that's what I use.
 
Old Jul 10, 2011 | 10:19 PM
  #33  
earl3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 823
From: Mojave, CA
Rep Power: 133
earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by raineycd
Hmm. This pull looks a little different. Looks like timing got pulled around 4800 and then again at 5500. Also around 5200-5300 it looks a little leaner than normal.

You running 93oct?

Maybe I missed it but I'm not seeing the lean point at 5200-5300, looks like ~0.77-0.79 lambda (columns H&J).

Seems like a pretty normal pump gas flash that would pick up a bit with a splash of race gas Though I can't comment on the camshaft position dev's

Edit: Is it normal for a K24 car to take 'til 5000rpm to see 1 bar in 3rd gear? ..seems excessively long
 

Last edited by earl3; Jul 10, 2011 at 10:26 PM.
Old Jul 10, 2011 | 10:31 PM
  #34  
raineycd's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,251
Rep Power: 166
raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by earl3
Maybe I missed it but I'm not seeing the lean point at 5200-5300, looks like ~0.77-0.79 lambda (columns H&J).

Seems like a pretty normal pump gas flash that would pick up a bit with a splash of race gas Though I can't comment on the camshaft position dev's

Edit: Is it normal for a K24 car to take 'til 5000rpm to see 1 bar in 3rd gear? ..seems excessively long
I consider .76-.77 a little on the lean side myself. I tend to err on the side of safety, but probably nothing to worry about...
 
Old Jul 11, 2011 | 02:48 AM
  #35  
Kenco911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 38
From: United Kingdom
Rep Power: 17
Kenco911 is infamous around these parts
Surely anything below 0.8 is quite rich (ie 0.77), and anything above 0.8 is running leaner! (lambda x 14.7)

Boost definately seems to build to maximum a bit on the slow side, my EPL tuned X50 with 200 cel cats & Milltek exhaust with a maximum 1bar boost gets to 0.9bar by 3650rpm & its 1bar maximum by 4050rpm.

This is on a UK car running 98RON fuel (93 US equivalent)

Have you done a boost leak check from the turbos?
 
Old Jul 11, 2011 | 05:46 PM
  #36  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 257
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
OK Guys,My question is....IF you had the right area and space to do a 4th gear data log,safely,,,,,I think that would be better because that is loading the engine more then 3rd,, which should help show the true values because of boosting sooner and higher ??...I would think if you push 3rd gear to the safety limits,that 4th up would put it over the edge in boost and pull timing with the fuel [93oct] being the same..We are not mentioning here anything about temp extremes either....I only say that because I see a difference in boost characteristics between those gears...I am not talking about the guys with EBCs,,only factory controllers .........Thanks
 
Old Jul 11, 2011 | 07:33 PM
  #37  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,731
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by johnspeed
OK Guys,My question is....IF you had the right area and space to do a 4th gear data log,safely,,,,,I think that would be better because that is loading the engine more then 3rd,, which should help show the true values because of boosting sooner and higher ??...I would think if you push 3rd gear to the safety limits,that 4th up would put it over the edge in boost and pull timing with the fuel [93oct] being the same..We are not mentioning here anything about temp extremes either....I only say that because I see a difference in boost characteristics between those gears...I am not talking about the guys with EBCs,,only factory controllers .........Thanks
Boost will in most cases creep up from 3rd to 4th.... esp on aftermarket Wgs... just like it does from 2nd to 3rd....
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Jul 11, 2011 | 08:26 PM
  #38  
kwei's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 611
From: Portland OR
Rep Power: 52
kwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Kenco911
Surely anything below 0.8 is quite rich (ie 0.77), and anything above 0.8 is running leaner! (lambda x 14.7)

Boost definately seems to build to maximum a bit on the slow side, my EPL tuned X50 with 200 cel cats & Milltek exhaust with a maximum 1bar boost gets to 0.9bar by 3650rpm & its 1bar maximum by 4050rpm.

This is on a UK car running 98RON fuel (93 US equivalent)

Have you done a boost leak check from the turbos?
I have not done a boost leak check yet. Thank you for the suggestion.
 
Old Jul 11, 2011 | 09:31 PM
  #39  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 257
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Boost will in most cases creep up from 3rd to 4th.... esp on aftermarket Wgs... just like it does from 2nd to 3rd....
OK,,,That is known,,,But how about the data log issue in those different gears??.......Thanks
 
Old Jul 11, 2011 | 10:56 PM
  #40  
raineycd's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,251
Rep Power: 166
raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Kenco911
Surely anything below 0.8 is quite rich (ie 0.77), and anything above 0.8 is running leaner! (lambda x 14.7)
I think you have it backwards...
 
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 12:07 AM
  #41  
earl3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 823
From: Mojave, CA
Rep Power: 133
earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by raineycd
I think you have it backwards...
0.77 lambda is a 11.3 AFR (if burning gasoline), a little on the fat side under load but within reason
 
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 02:00 AM
  #42  
Kenco911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 38
From: United Kingdom
Rep Power: 17
Kenco911 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by raineycd
I think you have it backwards...
Unless I'm going mad I think you have it backwards! Please correct me if I'm wrong.

0.77 x 14.7 = 11.3 (11.3 parts air to 1 part fuel) RICHER

0.83 x 14.7 = 12.2 (12.2 parts air to 1 part fuel) LEANER, as there is more air for that 1 part of fuel.

On boost, I like to see 0.8, which is about 12.0 AFR
 
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 06:48 AM
  #43  
raineycd's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,251
Rep Power: 166
raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !raineycd Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Kenco911
Unless I'm going mad I think you have it backwards! Please correct me if I'm wrong.

0.77 x 14.7 = 11.3 (11.3 parts air to 1 part fuel) RICHER

0.83 x 14.7 = 12.2 (12.2 parts air to 1 part fuel) LEANER, as there is more air for that 1 part of fuel.

On boost, I like to see 0.8, which is about 12.0 AFR
I am not a tuner, so I may have it backwards... I just know where my car is supposed to be at...
 
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 05:43 PM
  #44  
kwei's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 611
From: Portland OR
Rep Power: 52
kwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud ofkwei has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by raineycd
I am not a tuner, so I may have it backwards... I just know where my car is supposed to be at...
Chad, at least you are aware of it. I have a bit of catching up to do I think.

Guess I will start planning my camshaft sensor replacement project, wonder what else I can find an excuse to upgrade while I'm in there...: )
 
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 08:40 PM
  #45  
Nor Cal Turbo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 522
From: Lake Oswego OR
Rep Power: 82
Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !Nor Cal Turbo Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by kwei
Chad, at least you are aware of it. I have a bit of catching up to do I think.

Guess I will start planning my camshaft sensor replacement project, wonder what else I can find an excuse to upgrade while I'm in there...: )
While you are in there, definitely change spark plugs and coilpacks. The newer coilpacks are a 997 part number. Intercoolers will be out so you could upgrade them and maybe install some new boost hoses. Just some ideas to throw out there for you. Good luck with your project. Keep us updated on how things go.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 PM.