996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Physics Question About Upgrading Turbos

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 03:05 PM
  #1  
daytrip00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 160
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 22
daytrip00 is infamous around these parts
Physics Question About Upgrading Turbos

I was discussing this with my dad last night (a mechanical engineer) about turbo upgrades. I've seen a whole bunch of people on this forum talk about gains from upgrading turbos at a given level of boost. Now, I understand that forced induction is all about increasing mass flow into the intake manifold.

Now, if we go back to high school chemistry, PV = nRT. n is directly proportional to mass, so n = PV / RT. Given that the intake manifold doesn't change, Volume (V) can be assumed to be constant. So we can either increase the pressure or decrease the Temperature to increase mass flow.

So here's the thing. I've got a 1.1 bar tune on my K16 turbos and, while I haven't dynoed it, I'm assuming that i'm putting out something like 400-420awhp. Now, I've seen people with A28's putting down 500awhp on a 1.1 bar tune. How can that be? Is it the water cooling lines preventing heat soak into the cold side of the turbos or is it something else that I'm missing?
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
Nikolas's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,241
From: Truckee
Rep Power: 82
Nikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant future
I believe it has to do with the volume of air moved for a given compressor wheel at a given pressure. A smaller turbo will pass a smaller volume of air than a larger turbo given the same pressure. While the volume of the intake is static, the amount of compressed air in that volume can be variable.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 03:30 PM
  #3  
daytrip00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 160
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 22
daytrip00 is infamous around these parts
It can only be variable with pressure and temperature. I'm taking pressure to be fixed, so it can only vary with temperature. I suppose it's possible that the intake manifold has to pull timing to keep things at a constant pressure but that doesn't seem quite right to me.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 03:52 PM
  #4  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
It's way more than just PV=nRT. You need to think about the engine as an air pump so you're talking about air flow, not just pressure and how efficient your set-up is in moving that air.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 04:25 PM
  #5  
daytrip00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 160
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 22
daytrip00 is infamous around these parts
It's actually pretty close to PV = nRT, the mass flow equation is:

Qm = ρ * C * (∆P)^n

ρ is the air density and is given by:

ρ = P / (RT)

Since C is constant, again, we're left with an equation that only varies with Pressure and Temperature. The engine can change it's resistive load by pushing or pulling timing, but what would cause it to do that other than changes in Temperature and Pressure?
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 04:32 PM
  #6  
Morden314's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 63
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 19
Morden314 is infamous around these parts
The difference is in the density of the air filling the cylinders. A bigger turbo tends to heat air less as it compresses it than a small turbo, all things being equal. A turbo that heats up air less at a given pressure will be more efficient and gain more power. Also cooler denser air lets you inject more fuel for a bigger bang. The only trade off from usingwhat bigger andthe bigger turbosthe generally is more turbo lag or narrowing of powerband.

Talk to any board tuner for more details in comparing turbos.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 04:43 PM
  #7  
daytrip00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 160
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 22
daytrip00 is infamous around these parts
That's what I've been thinking Morden. Thanks.

I really just wanted to understand the physics. I'm building up my car to AutoX in ASP right now (though maybe not in the future) which precludes Turbo upgrades, but I wanted to know where the differences came from. More being inquisitive than needing information with purpose.

This means that bigger turbos and bigger ICs will work hand in hand...
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
pumptech's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,030
From: houston
Rep Power: 82
pumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond repute
Why are u holding volume constant? As pressure goes up volume in the system goes up to a certain point. I'm sure the engine can take more volume than you can safely cram into it! Think of an air compressor. As long as u have a strong enough pump u can cram more and more volume into it. Cooling it down will help some but not proportionately more! Pressure is the biggest factor and that's what the larger wheel is able to do.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #9  
daytrip00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 160
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 22
daytrip00 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by pumptech
Why are u holding volume constant? As pressure goes up volume in the system goes up to a certain point. I'm sure the engine can take more volume than you can safely cram into it! Think of an air compressor. As long as u have a strong enough pump u can cram more and more volume into it. Cooling it down will help some but not proportionately more! Pressure is the biggest factor and that's what the larger wheel is able to do.
In an air compresser, volume is most certainly constant. If the volume changed you'd se a big bulge in your tank.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:18 PM
  #10  
Nikolas's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,241
From: Truckee
Rep Power: 82
Nikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant futureNikolas has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by daytrip00
In an air compresser, volume is most certainly constant. If the volume changed you'd se a big bulge in your tank.
Yes but, there certainly are varying levels of compressed air that fit in that volume. You cannot look at air as constant as a solid or a liquid.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:36 PM
  #11  
soloracer996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 122
From: Calgary, Alberta
Rep Power: 20
soloracer996TT is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by daytrip00
I was discussing this with my dad last night (a mechanical engineer) about turbo upgrades. I've seen a whole bunch of people on this forum talk about gains from upgrading turbos at a given level of boost. Now, I understand that forced induction is all about increasing mass flow into the intake manifold.

Now, if we go back to high school chemistry, PV = nRT. n is directly proportional to mass, so n = PV / RT. Given that the intake manifold doesn't change, Volume (V) can be assumed to be constant. So we can either increase the pressure or decrease the Temperature to increase mass flow.

So here's the thing. I've got a 1.1 bar tune on my K16 turbos and, while I haven't dynoed it, I'm assuming that i'm putting out something like 400-420awhp. Now, I've seen people with A28's putting down 500awhp on a 1.1 bar tune. How can that be? Is it the water cooling lines preventing heat soak into the cold side of the turbos or is it something else that I'm missing?
If that were the case you would have the same tune for all cars regardless of what turbo is installed. Using your logic we should be able to make our intake manifolds smaller, thus creating more pressure (PSI) and make more power. The answer has more to do with flow than pressure.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:37 PM
  #12  
ant_8u's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,751
From: Warwickshire, England
Rep Power: 141
ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Nikolas
Yes but, there certainly are varying levels of compressed air that fit in that volume. You cannot look at air as constant as a solid or a liquid.
That's why he mentioned 1.1bar in his first post

He's saying the volume of the intake piping is a constant, and that the air pressure is at a constant 1.1bar for both turbo set-ups
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:38 PM
  #13  
ant_8u's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,751
From: Warwickshire, England
Rep Power: 141
ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by soloracer996TT
The answer has more to do with flow than pressure.
Thumbs up
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:47 PM
  #14  
daytrip00's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 160
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 22
daytrip00 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by soloracer996TT
If that were the case you would have the same tune for all cars regardless of what turbo is installed. Using your logic we should be able to make our intake manifolds smaller, thus creating more pressure (PSI) and make more power. The answer has more to do with flow than pressure.
Well... I'm holding volume constant. Same intake manifold, just a different turbo. As i understand it, flow will be related to intake timing. And intake timing will be related to temperature and pressure (and, of course, volume, but i'm holding that constant).

Just trying to understand the physics from an engineer's perspective.

Tony, that article you sent is awesome. I think (from my initial scan) it looks like exactly the info i was looking for.
 
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 10:39 PM
  #15  
Morden314's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 63
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 19
Morden314 is infamous around these parts
Its easy to get caught up with psi, but its more than that. An extreme case could be a bad roots blower generating 1bar but heating up the air so much that the density of the air is very low, resulting in little gain. A nice set of k16's flow much more effiently with same psi but generate more power because they dont heat up air as much lowing the density of the air. A bigger turbo could be even more efficient since it spins slower to generate same psi, heating air less, more density = more power with same psi. This is to answer why the difference in power between two turbos generating the same psi.

A bigger turbo also gives you more flow capacity to generate higher boost safely than a smaller turbo, downside is lag, assuming all else is equal.

Nitro adds little psi and gains huge power by adding lots of cold/dense O2 allowing you to add a bunch of fuel and zoom you go.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 PM.