996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

In-dash boost not matching actual boost

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 07:35 PM
  #31  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tony@epl
The 997tt will not use the map to calculate load, this is fact. Yes, load is effected by the map sensor but not a true calculation.

Unplug the maf's on a stock turbo 996tt, then unplug the maf on a 997tt with say 3076's. Log actual specified load and corrected specified load and compare vs actual load. It will all make sense...

The ecu isn't trying to guessmimate anything, there are "no maf" airflow tables that run "fake airflow" when maf's fail. We used to set these to "0" so when our customers tried to run mafless on maf based tunes the car would just die.

Im so against the whole mafless idea because frankly there are no real previsions to run speed density in the 997/996 ecu. Just because you can make it work, doesn't mean its the right way to do things.
Tony, I respectfully disagree. If you datalog a "mafless" tune on a 997tt, the output MAF values show as 0s throughout the RPM range on the Durametric. However, that is not true for LOAD values. They are calculated/appear as "normal". So how do you think these values are calculated when no MAF sensor is present?
 
Old Nov 27, 2011 | 08:20 PM
  #32  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tony@epl
Datalogging anything won't help/prove anything He already know that your dash is reading different the actual boost. Its not a boost leak or bad dv, ect.

My guess, bad map sensor or he car was modified pervious Tom owning.

We saw this problem recently on another car and found this (radio shack special)...


OK,,Then you are saying a data log wont show the correct boost over a dash gauge or the test gauge in which both differ in this case??
Then what would be correct to judge it by??..This seems very contradicting over everything you have said in the past about getting real boost from data logging
 
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 12:32 AM
  #33  
dragonman4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 642
From: Northern NJ
Rep Power: 67
dragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond repute
Fast fwd brought up a good question for me. Difference in gas can cause a .2 bar change in boost? As in if I'm running 91 instead of 93 I can lose that much boost? I figured I would be losing a little power but that's a fair amount.
 
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 05:32 AM
  #34  
FAST FWD's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,157
From: Indiana
Rep Power: 112
FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by dragonman4
Fast fwd brought up a good question for me. Difference in gas can cause a .2 bar change in boost? As in if I'm running 91 instead of 93 I can lose that much boost? I figured I would be losing a little power but that's a fair amount.
Boost is not a measure of power, although they do go together. As Tony points out above, the map provides a target engine load, and the ecu controls the various inputs (injector time, boost, etc.) are adjusted to reach that load, if it is safely possible to get there. Lambda values, knock sensors, inlet air temps, etc. are all part of the evaluation of engine conditions. Some of the inputs, such as ignition angle and boost level are modified to prevent detonation. You can't provide more air than you can provide fuel for.

Lower octane, higher ambient temperatures, higher altitude all will lead to lower power. My max load decreases by about 5% in the middle of the summer when it's hot and humid. Boost goes down as well. OTOH, on cool days in the fall I can reach full target load and the boost is 0.1-0.2 bar higher.

Jon
 
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 07:49 AM
  #35  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Hmmm....When I was on a road trip once,,,,I only had a choice of 91 octane as the highest fuel their....My boost did show the same on the dash as with the normal 93 octane but the car lost some pulling power and felt slower to me....
 
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 08:21 AM
  #36  
dragonman4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 642
From: Northern NJ
Rep Power: 67
dragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond reputedragonman4 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by FAST FWD
Boost is not a measure of power, although they do go together. As Tony points out above, the map provides a target engine load, and the ecu controls the various inputs (injector time, boost, etc.) are adjusted to reach that load, if it is safely possible to get there. Lambda values, knock sensors, inlet air temps, etc. are all part of the evaluation of engine conditions. Some of the inputs, such as ignition angle and boost level are modified to prevent detonation. You can't provide more air than you can provide fuel for.

Lower octane, higher ambient temperatures, higher altitude all will lead to lower power. My max load decreases by about 5% in the middle of the summer when it's hot and humid. Boost goes down as well. OTOH, on cool days in the fall I can reach full target load and the boost is 0.1-0.2 bar higher.

Jon
Thanks for the clarification. I also meant to clarify in that I knew lower grade fuel would result in lower power, but I wanted to make sure that using a lower grade fuel wouldn't actually lower boost.
 
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 08:37 AM
  #37  
tkuwaha's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 65
From: usa
Rep Power: 19
tkuwaha is infamous around these parts
To the OP, where is the sensor for the aftermarket boost gauge located relative to the stock sensor location? Pressure loss due to piping and intercoolers may explain the difference in two readings.
 
Old Apr 30, 2015 | 12:20 PM
  #38  
NTIMD8's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 738
From: Canada
Rep Power: 64
NTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond reputeNTIMD8 has a reputation beyond repute
I hate threads that never get updated with the resolution.
 
Old Apr 30, 2015 | 03:53 PM
  #39  
wolfhedge's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 919
From: Australia
Rep Power: 106
wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TTdude
Tony, I respectfully disagree. If you datalog a "mafless" tune on a 997tt, the output MAF values show as 0s throughout the RPM range on the Durametric. However, that is not true for LOAD values. They are calculated/appear as "normal". So how do you think these values are calculated when no MAF sensor is present?
I was told on my MAFLESS tune that my datalogged LOAD% was falacious, a forgazi, but when I did the vbox double take the implied torque and engine power seemed spot on (996 Turbo)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
racerbvd
Automobiles For Sale
1
Feb 11, 2016 12:07 PM
ECS Tuning - VW
VW Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 28, 2015 11:48 AM
PelicanParts.com
Cayenne 955/957 Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 26, 2015 04:25 PM
PelicanParts.com
Cayenne Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 26, 2015 04:24 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.