996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

How much BHP on straight K24 at 1.1 / 1.2 ?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 11:34 PM
  #16  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by ari
I made 516 HP on RWD dynojet with K24s, waste-gates, DVs and exhaust and off the shelf GIAC tune.



Subsequently I wade 530 AWHP on a Mustang with Tial turbos, injector and Inter-coolers with the proper tune.

I'm sorry but as good as the dynojet made me feel, the car was not nearly as fast as it is now.

I know because the car can not maintain traction under boost through 1st 2nd and part of third now (IN AWD). With the K24s, the car had trouble breaking traction in RWD mode in 2nd. The difference is very pronounced.

I hate to burst any bubbles, but I have no faith in dynojet numbers. They're just not real. Most every Dynoject will show you a FLAT HP curve from 4500-redline.
The problem with that is that most industry standard cars HP numbers are based on dynojet numbers. Reliable or not, its the chosen model.
 
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 12:59 AM
  #17  
SamboTT@ByDesign's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,901
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 0
SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !
Cosworth,
What you have is sort of where it all began. The RS Tuning program that goes past 1.0 is pushing over 540ps with K24's, a 5bar FPR, exhaust and air filter. I would guess you are running a solid 550ps+.

ps is close enough to hp. Just a tad more conservative.
 
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 03:55 PM
  #18  
dreamtripper's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 329
From: FL/NYC
Rep Power: 32
dreamtripper is infamous around these parts
I have a K24 setup from AWE. I've never dyo'd my car, but AWE shows the following on a Mustang Dyno: Baseline of 355HP for a stock car and 503HP for a car a car with the K24 setup on 93 Octane.

I considered 24/18s but will likely never put race gas in my car so I felt the incremental increase in performance on pump would not be worth it.
 
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 04:09 PM
  #19  
cosworth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 123
From: Milan (Italy)
Rep Power: 20
cosworth is infamous around these parts
i would not go over 1.0 on pumped gas without at least a 5 bar.... you are running lean








reading some forums i've the idea that there are oppesed opinions about 5 Bar Fpr essentiality from US Tuners vs European Tuners...I mean , the only one that use 5 Bar in Europe is Fvd with K24/26...All the other like RUF , 9FF , Rs -tuning etc. don't use it at least for applications in order of 550 - 600 Hp.
Please consider that when my tuner (from Rs-tuning company) estimate to me K24/26 conversion for sustained 1.2 Bar , he never speak to me about the necessary of 5 Bar..
Sure European tuners has the tendency to stay more conservative that US tuners about boost levels and Hp unless you don't go for radical and most expensive mods so i think that when more fuel is really needed Europeans directly goes for upgraded injectors and/or fuel pump.
I don't know what is the right way to go but sure if RUF and Rs Tuning says you can boost 1.2 bar on K26's without 5 Bar ,i think that my 1.1 - 1.2 on straight K24s with most reason should be ok with A/F ratio and injectors duty cycle.

What you have is sort of where it all began. The RS Tuning program that goes past 1.0 is pushing over 540ps with K24's, a 5bar FPR, exhaust and air filter. I would guess you are running a solid 550ps+.
If i'm really at 550 BHP i'm very happy
 
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 05:58 PM
  #20  
Fadi's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 990
From: Bucharest, Romania
Rep Power: 0
Fadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond repute
as far i've seen on some tuner sites flashed k24 including 5 bar and free flow exhaust good for about 530 hp, others saying 550 hp. I didn't dyno my car yet but is night and day
 
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #21  
mod mike's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 854
From: calif
Rep Power: 52
mod mike has a spectacular aura aboutmod mike has a spectacular aura aboutmod mike has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by cosworth
reading some forums i've the idea that there are oppesed opinions about 5 Bar Fpr essentiality from US Tuners vs European Tuners...I mean , the only one that use 5 Bar in Europe is Fvd with K24/26...All the other like RUF , 9FF , Rs -tuning etc. don't use it at least for applications in order of 550 - 600 Hp.
Please consider that when my tuner (from Rs-tuning company) estimate to me K24/26 conversion for sustained 1.2 Bar , he never speak to me about the necessary of 5 Bar..
Sure European tuners has the tendency to stay more conservative that US tuners about boost levels and Hp unless you don't go for radical and most expensive mods so i think that when more fuel is really needed Europeans directly goes for upgraded injectors and/or fuel pump.
I don't know what is the right way to go but sure if RUF and Rs Tuning says you can boost 1.2 bar on K26's without 5 Bar ,i think that my 1.1 - 1.2 on straight K24s with most reason should be ok with A/F ratio and injectors duty cycle.


If i'm really at 550 BHP i'm very happy
from what i know if you are using race gas all the time then that would be fine. if you are on pump gas, yes your car will run and run fine until you blow your engine... more gas, injectors, 5 bar = safety. i went with injectors not only for safety, but the response is insane..... very quick car on 1.1 bar pump gas... note: i will only run 1.3-4 with my race file, thats race gas... i don't think your close to 550 hp.. 480-500 most likely!!! thats moving
 

Last edited by mod mike; Dec 12, 2011 at 06:22 PM.
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 07:01 PM
  #22  
cosworth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 123
From: Milan (Italy)
Rep Power: 20
cosworth is infamous around these parts
from what i know if you are using race gas all the time then that would be fine.
I use only European pump 100 octan fuel like SHELL V-Power 100 and i hope this is enough..i don't know how much US octan correspond Europe 100...occasionally i also use pump Europe 95 that shoul correspond to your US 91...but sure when use it i don't drive the car harder ...maybe i use it only for long highway trip to go to the beach with girlfriend
 
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 10:34 PM
  #23  
REVS11's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,687
From: CA
Rep Power: 122
REVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond repute
If you are present when the tuner does your flash file, you will see they all have to work on keeping the AFR to hold steady with stock injectors and stock FPR (if you want safe AFR rather than max power), given you have moved your rpm limiter to 7100-ish. If you're at stock rev limiter I believe the injectors are still able to keep up decent.

However, the injector duty cycle at full rpm at only 1.0 bar with K16 (not even K24) is already above 95% with stock FPR at 7000rpm and up there the injectors usually lose precision. With 5bar FPR you get the injectors into a slightly more linear range where they could also give a touch margin.

5bar FPR is a dirt cheap way to get more margin for safety. It's not ideal bc it's not as accurate of a solution as adding better injectors, but they do add margin. It's not very hard to install either.
 
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #24  
REVS11's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,687
From: CA
Rep Power: 122
REVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by heavychevy
The problem with that is that most industry standard cars HP numbers are based on dynojet numbers. Reliable or not, its the chosen model.

Comment on dyno numbers:
Dynojets for talking actual power levels is like using slow watches to measure laptimes...
Sure I can do a 6-minute lap at the Nurburgring Nordschleife anytime with a stock 996TT, just give me a "Dynojet stopwatch"!

(they should start selling that but I'll take a percentage per sold item)
 
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 12:13 AM
  #25  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Actual power numbers are a myth imo because no one except manufacturers really know engine HP and that changes once you mod the car. A good dynojet number can tell you just as much about your car as a good mustang dyno. As mentioned on a daily basis dynos should primarily be used for baseline and deltas anyways because actual power can be argued forever.
 
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 03:33 PM
  #26  
cosworth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 123
From: Milan (Italy)
Rep Power: 20
cosworth is infamous around these parts
the injector duty cycle at full rpm at only 1.0 bar with K16 (not even K24) is already above 95% with stock FPR at 7000rpm and up there the injectors usually lose precision.
So i risk to run out of fuel when pushing my car at WOT to 7k rpms ?..even using 100 Ron Shell V-power ?
So how can RUF and Rs-tuning use Hybrid K24/26 boosting 1.2 mantein a decent A/F ratio with stock injectors and stock FPR ?
I don't belive that a Tuner like RUF make run his cars lean with risk of broken engine..
 
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 03:48 PM
  #27  
REVS11's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,687
From: CA
Rep Power: 122
REVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond reputeREVS11 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by cosworth
So i risk to run out of fuel when pushing my car at WOT to 7k rpms ?..even using 100 Ron Shell V-power ?
So how can RUF and Rs-tuning use Hybrid K24/26 boosting 1.2 mantein a decent A/F ratio with stock injectors and stock FPR ?
I don't belive that a Tuner like RUF make run his cars lean with risk of broken engine..
I don't know, maybe they run 98-100% duty cycle and leaner AFR and feel happy doing that. You should ask them. I do roadracing and live a long time between 5500-7100 rpm, often 35-40 deg C in summer track days and need a AFR to keep engine cool on 1.1-1.2 bar boost. If I did the odd power run maybe I would be ok with leaner AFR and maybe that's what they do. I added a 5bar FPR and my tuner had no problem to make the ECU hold the AFR to revlimiter.
 
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 03:58 PM
  #28  
vrybad's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 556
From: CT
Rep Power: 58
vrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant futurevrybad has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by heavychevy
Actual power numbers are a myth imo because no one except manufacturers really know engine HP and that changes once you mod the car. A good dynojet number can tell you just as much about your car as a good mustang dyno. As mentioned on a daily basis dynos should primarily be used for baseline and deltas anyways because actual power can be argued forever.

Absolutely!!

Can not be said any better than this.
Not sure why people don't understand this.
 
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 04:01 PM
  #29  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by cosworth
So i risk to run out of fuel when pushing my car at WOT to 7k rpms ?..even using 100 Ron Shell V-power ?
So how can RUF and Rs-tuning use Hybrid K24/26 boosting 1.2 mantein a decent A/F ratio with stock injectors and stock FPR ?
I don't belive that a Tuner like RUF make run his cars lean with risk of broken engine..
Hi,Just to add here.....I know FVD use to do alot of K24/26 turbo upgrades and they always had a 5bar included in there tuning map/ kit for them......
 
Old Dec 13, 2011 | 04:10 PM
  #30  
cosworth's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 123
From: Milan (Italy)
Rep Power: 20
cosworth is infamous around these parts
Hi,Just to add here.....I know FVD use to do alot of K24/26 turbo upgrades and they always had a 5bar included in there tuning map/ kit for them......
Yes John you're right .. if you take a look at one of mine previous posts in this topic , i also said that FVD (sure in my knowledge) is the only one in Europe that use 5 Bar for K24/26 conversion..But RUF and Rs-tuning don't use it.
In any case if the tuned MAP works accordly with Knock sensor , does not the ECU retard timing to prevent any engine damage if A/F ratio become too lean ?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 AM.