How much BHP on straight K24 at 1.1 / 1.2 ?
I made 516 HP on RWD dynojet with K24s, waste-gates, DVs and exhaust and off the shelf GIAC tune.

Subsequently I wade 530 AWHP on a Mustang with Tial turbos, injector and Inter-coolers with the proper tune.
I'm sorry but as good as the dynojet made me feel, the car was not nearly as fast as it is now.
I know because the car can not maintain traction under boost through 1st 2nd and part of third now (IN AWD). With the K24s, the car had trouble breaking traction in RWD mode in 2nd. The difference is very pronounced.
I hate to burst any bubbles, but I have no faith in dynojet numbers. They're just not real. Most every Dynoject will show you a FLAT HP curve from 4500-redline.

Subsequently I wade 530 AWHP on a Mustang with Tial turbos, injector and Inter-coolers with the proper tune.
I'm sorry but as good as the dynojet made me feel, the car was not nearly as fast as it is now.
I know because the car can not maintain traction under boost through 1st 2nd and part of third now (IN AWD). With the K24s, the car had trouble breaking traction in RWD mode in 2nd. The difference is very pronounced.
I hate to burst any bubbles, but I have no faith in dynojet numbers. They're just not real. Most every Dynoject will show you a FLAT HP curve from 4500-redline.
Cosworth,
What you have is sort of where it all began. The RS Tuning program that goes past 1.0 is pushing over 540ps with K24's, a 5bar FPR, exhaust and air filter. I would guess you are running a solid 550ps+.
ps is close enough to hp. Just a tad more conservative.
What you have is sort of where it all began. The RS Tuning program that goes past 1.0 is pushing over 540ps with K24's, a 5bar FPR, exhaust and air filter. I would guess you are running a solid 550ps+.
ps is close enough to hp. Just a tad more conservative.
I have a K24 setup from AWE. I've never dyo'd my car, but AWE shows the following on a Mustang Dyno: Baseline of 355HP for a stock car and 503HP for a car a car with the K24 setup on 93 Octane.
I considered 24/18s but will likely never put race gas in my car so I felt the incremental increase in performance on pump would not be worth it.
I considered 24/18s but will likely never put race gas in my car so I felt the incremental increase in performance on pump would not be worth it.
i would not go over 1.0 on pumped gas without at least a 5 bar.... you are running lean
reading some forums i've the idea that there are oppesed opinions about 5 Bar Fpr essentiality from US Tuners vs European Tuners...I mean , the only one that use 5 Bar in Europe is Fvd with K24/26...All the other like RUF , 9FF , Rs -tuning etc. don't use it at least for applications in order of 550 - 600 Hp.
Please consider that when my tuner (from Rs-tuning company) estimate to me K24/26 conversion for sustained 1.2 Bar , he never speak to me about the necessary of 5 Bar..
Sure European tuners has the tendency to stay more conservative that US tuners about boost levels and Hp unless you don't go for radical and most expensive mods so i think that when more fuel is really needed Europeans directly goes for upgraded injectors and/or fuel pump.
I don't know what is the right way to go but sure if RUF and Rs Tuning says you can boost 1.2 bar on K26's without 5 Bar ,i think that my 1.1 - 1.2 on straight K24s with most reason should be ok with A/F ratio and injectors duty cycle.
What you have is sort of where it all began. The RS Tuning program that goes past 1.0 is pushing over 540ps with K24's, a 5bar FPR, exhaust and air filter. I would guess you are running a solid 550ps+.
reading some forums i've the idea that there are oppesed opinions about 5 Bar Fpr essentiality from US Tuners vs European Tuners...I mean , the only one that use 5 Bar in Europe is Fvd with K24/26...All the other like RUF , 9FF , Rs -tuning etc. don't use it at least for applications in order of 550 - 600 Hp.
Please consider that when my tuner (from Rs-tuning company) estimate to me K24/26 conversion for sustained 1.2 Bar , he never speak to me about the necessary of 5 Bar..
Sure European tuners has the tendency to stay more conservative that US tuners about boost levels and Hp unless you don't go for radical and most expensive mods so i think that when more fuel is really needed Europeans directly goes for upgraded injectors and/or fuel pump.
I don't know what is the right way to go but sure if RUF and Rs Tuning says you can boost 1.2 bar on K26's without 5 Bar ,i think that my 1.1 - 1.2 on straight K24s with most reason should be ok with A/F ratio and injectors duty cycle.
If i'm really at 550 BHP i'm very happy
Please consider that when my tuner (from Rs-tuning company) estimate to me K24/26 conversion for sustained 1.2 Bar , he never speak to me about the necessary of 5 Bar..
Sure European tuners has the tendency to stay more conservative that US tuners about boost levels and Hp unless you don't go for radical and most expensive mods so i think that when more fuel is really needed Europeans directly goes for upgraded injectors and/or fuel pump.
I don't know what is the right way to go but sure if RUF and Rs Tuning says you can boost 1.2 bar on K26's without 5 Bar ,i think that my 1.1 - 1.2 on straight K24s with most reason should be ok with A/F ratio and injectors duty cycle.
If i'm really at 550 BHP i'm very happy

Last edited by mod mike; Dec 12, 2011 at 06:22 PM.
from what i know if you are using race gas all the time then that would be fine.
If you are present when the tuner does your flash file, you will see they all have to work on keeping the AFR to hold steady with stock injectors and stock FPR (if you want safe AFR rather than max power), given you have moved your rpm limiter to 7100-ish. If you're at stock rev limiter I believe the injectors are still able to keep up decent.
However, the injector duty cycle at full rpm at only 1.0 bar with K16 (not even K24) is already above 95% with stock FPR at 7000rpm and up there the injectors usually lose precision. With 5bar FPR you get the injectors into a slightly more linear range where they could also give a touch margin.
5bar FPR is a dirt cheap way to get more margin for safety. It's not ideal bc it's not as accurate of a solution as adding better injectors, but they do add margin. It's not very hard to install either.
However, the injector duty cycle at full rpm at only 1.0 bar with K16 (not even K24) is already above 95% with stock FPR at 7000rpm and up there the injectors usually lose precision. With 5bar FPR you get the injectors into a slightly more linear range where they could also give a touch margin.
5bar FPR is a dirt cheap way to get more margin for safety. It's not ideal bc it's not as accurate of a solution as adding better injectors, but they do add margin. It's not very hard to install either.
Comment on dyno numbers:
Dynojets for talking actual power levels is like using slow watches to measure laptimes...
Sure I can do a 6-minute lap at the Nurburgring Nordschleife anytime with a stock 996TT, just give me a "Dynojet stopwatch"!

(they should start selling that but I'll take a percentage per sold item)
Actual power numbers are a myth imo because no one except manufacturers really know engine HP and that changes once you mod the car. A good dynojet number can tell you just as much about your car as a good mustang dyno. As mentioned on a daily basis dynos should primarily be used for baseline and deltas anyways because actual power can be argued forever.
the injector duty cycle at full rpm at only 1.0 bar with K16 (not even K24) is already above 95% with stock FPR at 7000rpm and up there the injectors usually lose precision.
So how can RUF and Rs-tuning use Hybrid K24/26 boosting 1.2 mantein a decent A/F ratio with stock injectors and stock FPR ?
I don't belive that a Tuner like RUF make run his cars lean with risk of broken engine..
So i risk to run out of fuel when pushing my car at WOT to 7k rpms ?..even using 100 Ron Shell V-power ?
So how can RUF and Rs-tuning use Hybrid K24/26 boosting 1.2 mantein a decent A/F ratio with stock injectors and stock FPR ?
I don't belive that a Tuner like RUF make run his cars lean with risk of broken engine..
So how can RUF and Rs-tuning use Hybrid K24/26 boosting 1.2 mantein a decent A/F ratio with stock injectors and stock FPR ?
I don't belive that a Tuner like RUF make run his cars lean with risk of broken engine..
Actual power numbers are a myth imo because no one except manufacturers really know engine HP and that changes once you mod the car. A good dynojet number can tell you just as much about your car as a good mustang dyno. As mentioned on a daily basis dynos should primarily be used for baseline and deltas anyways because actual power can be argued forever.
Absolutely!!
Can not be said any better than this.
Not sure why people don't understand this.
So i risk to run out of fuel when pushing my car at WOT to 7k rpms ?..even using 100 Ron Shell V-power ?
So how can RUF and Rs-tuning use Hybrid K24/26 boosting 1.2 mantein a decent A/F ratio with stock injectors and stock FPR ?
I don't belive that a Tuner like RUF make run his cars lean with risk of broken engine..
So how can RUF and Rs-tuning use Hybrid K24/26 boosting 1.2 mantein a decent A/F ratio with stock injectors and stock FPR ?
I don't belive that a Tuner like RUF make run his cars lean with risk of broken engine..
Hi,Just to add here.....I know FVD use to do alot of K24/26 turbo upgrades and they always had a 5bar included in there tuning map/ kit for them......
In any case if the tuned MAP works accordly with Knock sensor , does not the ECU retard timing to prevent any engine damage if A/F ratio become too lean ?




