996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Another run against a modded CTSV

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:11 PM
  #46  
Wealth Manager's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,236
From: NY
Rep Power: 110
Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !
I wish we had the option to "LIKE" comments on this forum. A few other forums I'm on has it…...
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:24 PM
  #47  
Dr.Duct_Mossburg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 13
From: DMV
Rep Power: 0
Dr.Duct_Mossburg is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by supra.z06
Isn't evilv's car faster then that, Mossburg?

-Val
His car is stock displacement and went 9.61.
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #48  
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,215
From: Birmingham, Al
Rep Power: 118
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
You can pit a '74 Pinto against a Koenigsegg Agera R or a Honda Civic against a
BMW M3 etc.. etc... ad infinitum. Run what you brung blah blah blah.

I have a Porsche turbo and I race and beat super bikes, blown stangs, modded
ZR1s and Cadillac CTS-Vs. I can safely say, there's not a CTS-V in the world
that'll beat my Porsche under any circumstance.

But a more "apples to apples" race would be against an M5 or a Jaguar xfr
IMHO.
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #49  
Dr.Duct_Mossburg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 13
From: DMV
Rep Power: 0
Dr.Duct_Mossburg is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Wealth Manager
Show me another non built car running a 10.4@135. Its not on the list on the V forum or on drag times. Yea guys will run a 10.6-10.5@133-134.
Granted he is only running "special" setup on his pullies, exhaust and an aggressive E85 tune, not one other bolt on, no cams, headers…etc. He beats full bolt on cars here out in the tri state all the time.


Also I think a supercharged v8 stock isn't your normal "family" sedan and that suspension and brake system, so to tell me that car isn't made to "race" I don't know what is.

Also why else would you come in unless you owned the car on hand and to defend it, lol. Come on now…….
Your boy isn't trapping 135 with all stock internals, manifolds and a bottle. I'm not even wasting my time in this argument.

I was linked here by someone in this thread and offered my thoughts to him, which he told me to post here. Why would I care if the op who appears to have a fairly decently nodded car beats an averagely modded car that's considerably heavier? Makes no sense bud.
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:32 PM
  #50  
Dr.Duct_Mossburg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 13
From: DMV
Rep Power: 0
Dr.Duct_Mossburg is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by layinback
You can pit a '74 Pinto against a Koenigsegg Agera R or a Honda Civic against a
BMW M3 etc.. etc... ad infinitum. Run what you brung blah blah blah.

I have a Porsche turbo and I race and beat super bikes, blown stangs, modded
ZR1s and Cadillac CTS-Vs. I can safely say, there's not a CTS-V in the world
that'll beat my Porsche under any circumstance.

But a more "apples to apples" race would be against an M5 or a Jaguar xfr
IMHO.
What does your pcar run? And where are you located? You must have BIG hp to outrun a liter bike if properly driven.

Btw, lots of ****ing egos in this room. Maybe a few of you should go jerk off in a closet so you can have a level headed conversation.
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:35 PM
  #51  
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,215
From: Birmingham, Al
Rep Power: 118
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
A tune, exhaust and simple 16g turbo upgrade traps 135....no internals.
Big turbo and internals = 150-160 trap
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:39 PM
  #52  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by layinback
A tune, exhaust and simple 16g turbo upgrade traps 135....no internals.
Big turbo and internals = 150-160 trap
I haven't seen a lot do that with that,16g ...Just saying..
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:41 PM
  #53  
Dr.Duct_Mossburg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 13
From: DMV
Rep Power: 0
Dr.Duct_Mossburg is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by layinback
A tune, exhaust and simple 16g turbo upgrade traps 135....no internals.
Big turbo and internals = 150-160 trap
That's not what I'm asking you. What did YOU run in YOUR car to give you the ability to say what you said?
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:41 PM
  #54  
Wealth Manager's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,236
From: NY
Rep Power: 110
Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Dr.Duct_Mossburg
Your boy isn't trapping 135 with all stock internals, manifolds and a bottle. I'm not even wasting my time in this argument.

I was linked here by someone in this thread and offered my thoughts to him, which he told me to post here. Why would I care if the op who appears to have a fairly decently nodded car beats an averagely modded car that's considerably heavier? Makes no sense bud.
He just went 10.5@134 yesterday at ATCO when he was trying to go for better times, stock internals with just exhaust, tune pullies and E85. His pullie setup is the key that 95% of guys in their V's are not doing. If you want the slips I can get the copy for you.


Originally Posted by Dr.Duct_Mossburg
What does your pcar run? And where are you located? You must have BIG hp to outrun a liter bike if properly driven.

Btw, lots of ****ing egos in this room. Maybe a few of you should go jerk off in a closet so you can have a level headed conversation.

How old are you? You come off kind of immature by telling people to go jerk off or what not. Were just talking and having fun here. And there are plenty of guys on this forum with 1000+whp and wtq that will smoke bikes all day long thats just common knowledge which leads me to believe that you are younger and why I asked my original question.
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:43 PM
  #55  
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,215
From: Birmingham, Al
Rep Power: 118
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Dr.Duct_Mossburg
What does your pcar run? And where are you located? You must have BIG hp to outrun a liter bike if properly driven.

Btw, lots of ****ing egos in this room. Maybe a few of you should go jerk off in a closet so you can have a level headed conversation.
I have 1000 crank and weigh 3035 lbs with 1/4 tank.

My car is 4.65 60-130 and will hit 300 kph from a dead stop in the
14 second range.

BTW, I love the Cadillac V. I've been def considering a 2012 coupe.
It's a drop dead sexy car with a fantastic engine. One of the best
bang for your buck cars on the planet.

This isn't ego on my part. It's just a poor comparison and not much of
an argument. People can race anything they want to but if you're going
to debate about it.........you need a more intelligent and appropriate premise.
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:45 PM
  #56  
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,215
From: Birmingham, Al
Rep Power: 118
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by johnspeed
I haven't seen a lot do that with that,16g ...Just saying..
TT Turbo? Todd and a few others trapped low-mid 130s. You can def hit
mid 130s with bolt ons!
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 06:54 PM
  #57  
layinback's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,215
From: Birmingham, Al
Rep Power: 118
layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !layinback Is a GOD !
btw, I'm not ganging up on you. I see that **** on here and i've had it done to me.
I don't like it.

The 911 and its various iterations are the most winning model of sport car over the last
50 years. A new Porsche turbo cost over 150k. That's more than double the cost of the
Cadillac. The cadillac weighs over 2 tons! This isn't even apples to oranges, this is
apples to hand-grenades lol.
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 07:15 PM
  #58  
Wealth Manager's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,236
From: NY
Rep Power: 110
Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !Wealth Manager Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by layinback

BTW, I love the Cadillac V. I've been def considering a 2012 coupe.
It's a drop dead sexy car with a fantastic engine. One of the best
bang for your buck cars on the planet.

This isn't ego on my part. It's just a poor comparison and not much of
an argument. People can race anything they want to but if you're going
to debate about it.........you need a more intelligent and appropriate premise.
Originally Posted by layinback
btw, I'm not ganging up on you. I see that **** on here and i've had it done to me.
I don't like it.
I second this on all levels…..
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 07:16 PM
  #59  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Dr.Duct_Mossburg
His car is stock displacement and went 9.61.

I see what you did there. "Built motor with stock displacement" isn't the same thing as a "stock motor".
 
Old Dec 3, 2013 | 07:19 PM
  #60  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Wealth Manager
And there are plenty of guys on this forum with 1000+whp and wtq that will smoke bikes all day long thats just common knowledge which leads me to believe that you are younger and why I asked my original question.

Truth. Most liter bikes are easy kills at the 750+whp level. Done it more times than I can count in a Porsche. The exception being those damn S1000Rs. They require a 'bit' more power to deal with.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 AM.