Finally got some MAFless k16 dyno numbers!
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 512
From: Batavia, IL
Rep Power: 66
Finally got some MAFless k16 dyno numbers!
So I threw the car on Komet Motorsport's Mustang Dyno to see if my shift points are correct and it put down some decent numbers for the tiny stock K16 turbos.
Car has a MAFLess Cobb AP tune by Sam@ByDesign with filters on the turbos, 5 bar FPR, 997GT2RS intercoolers and Speedtech 2.5 X-pipe with 100 cell cats and is RWD.
482whp and 483wtq on 93 octane tune.
The fact that it did this on pump gas on a Mustang dyno should put to bed the idea that stock K16s can't make 500whp.
Video of one of the runs.
Not super exciting, but the car moves pretty good for a lightly modded 15 year old pile.
1/4 mile numbers this fall when the weather cools down.
Car has a MAFLess Cobb AP tune by Sam@ByDesign with filters on the turbos, 5 bar FPR, 997GT2RS intercoolers and Speedtech 2.5 X-pipe with 100 cell cats and is RWD.
482whp and 483wtq on 93 octane tune.
The fact that it did this on pump gas on a Mustang dyno should put to bed the idea that stock K16s can't make 500whp.
Video of one of the runs.
Not super exciting, but the car moves pretty good for a lightly modded 15 year old pile.
1/4 mile numbers this fall when the weather cools down.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 111
From: Boston
Rep Power: 0
Congrats! A lot of people doubt the stock turbos but I made 515whp/575wtq on pump 93oct and 550whp/610wtq on E85 with a similiar setup. It was fun on this setup as well, instant power. Mustang dyno as well.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 111
From: Boston
Rep Power: 0
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,081
From: Omaha, NE
Rep Power: 185
Any guesstimate on how much gain there is from filters on Turbos vs. the stock system?
I like the response of my tiny like K16's but not sure i want to go full filter on turbo's incase i get caught in the rain, etc.
I like the response of my tiny like K16's but not sure i want to go full filter on turbo's incase i get caught in the rain, etc.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 512
From: Batavia, IL
Rep Power: 66
I've been caught in several downpours. Zero issues. Filters getting wet isn't a problem. Driving through standing water that goes up past the height of the filter is, but I would never drive through standing water in this car.
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 512
From: Batavia, IL
Rep Power: 66
This is true, but my car is not tapped out. I was making just under 1 bar on the dyno and I have catted 2.5in exhaust plus no breathing mods post turbo. Add that Mustang dynos (when properly setup) typically show less power than a Dynojet and I could see an AWD easily pass 500whp especially on race gas or E85.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 208
From: Brick, nj
Rep Power: 38
This is true, but my car is not tapped out. I was making just under 1 bar on the dyno and I have catted 2.5in exhaust plus no breathing mods post turbo. Add that Mustang dynos (when properly setup) typically show less power than a Dynojet and I could see an AWD easily pass 500whp especially on race gas or E85.
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 512
From: Batavia, IL
Rep Power: 66
damn! Factory freak! I have 2.5 exhaust with no cats, ported exhaust manis, 5 bar fuel reg, K16/k24 hybrids, gt2rs intercoolers and piping, and a Cobb with sams tune. On my old tune of 1 bar I put down 423/439 hp/tq on a mustang dyno. Now I’m 1.5 bar after the intercoolers and it feels crazy fast. No leaks. Oh well. Car feels great
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 89
From: Spring, TX
Rep Power: 26
My car shaved off 3/10ths in the 1/4mi by going filters on turbos. Huge difference IMO.