Dynoed the GT2 today
Originally Posted by Jean
What is nice about these graphs is the curve. Check out those AFRs and torque curve.. smooth and consistent.
You can get more peak HP if you go leaner, check out these graphs to compare https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...20&postcount=2 but what you will end up getting is a much slower car that keeps fighting detonation.
You can get more peak HP if you go leaner, check out these graphs to compare https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...20&postcount=2 but what you will end up getting is a much slower car that keeps fighting detonation.
Originally Posted by RennTechV12
It won't matter to me anyway, I'm taking the turbos out and going with my EVOMS GT700 kit on the car

I was just liked the graphs.
RENN 12,
just to be clear, what octane did the CAR have in it for the dyno.
It may be confusing becuase you STORE you high ocane fuel at the
dyno place. That does not mean you were running it in that car at the
time of dyno...
Marty K.
just to be clear, what octane did the CAR have in it for the dyno.
It may be confusing becuase you STORE you high ocane fuel at the
dyno place. That does not mean you were running it in that car at the
time of dyno...
Marty K.
that car has stock headers, airbox, etc....
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
I think this is a nice and very safe package, not a high performance one of course, Sharky is right, there is a good dose of lag (I guess stock headers & cats). Although the same output (550ish FWHP) did run a 10.7 @130 or so a couple of year back in the shootout!
Originally Posted by Jean
I think this is a nice and very safe package, not a high performance one of course, Sharky is right, there is a good dose of lag (I guess stock headers & cats). Although the same output (550ish FWHP) did run a 10.7 @130 or so a couple of year back in the shootout!
Maybe I'm not a good enough driver but my panties were in danger! The way the power comes on is frightening. Much more so than in an AWD TT with even more power...
Originally Posted by sharkster
Oh for sure. We've done a lot of 550ish-600ish GT2s in the Bay Area and the power is balanced, safe and controllable. It could be said that the lag actually helps make it "safer" etc... The few that we've done with quicker-spooling 650-700 style kits have been downright scary
Maybe I'm not a good enough driver but my panties were in danger! The way the power comes on is frightening. Much more so than in an AWD TT with even more power...
Maybe I'm not a good enough driver but my panties were in danger! The way the power comes on is frightening. Much more so than in an AWD TT with even more power...GT2 will toast its tires up there in gears on end. BTW i agree with what you said, the little lag my car has doesnt immediately start spinning through the whole gear like my M3 did by the tap of the throttle in first, along with the suspension, wheels and tires it was meant for it. But when boost comes on i cant imagine in those cars
Originally Posted by sharkster
Maybe I'm not a good enough driver but my panties were in danger!
I can relate too!
Originally Posted by Jean
Sharky, it is not the HP, that bladder doesn't get better with age you know that don't you ?
I can relate too!
I can relate too!
Maybe that's why I put a deposit down on the 997GT3 instead of.... a Turbo car?
Originally Posted by Jean
I think this is a nice and very safe package, not a high performance one of course, Sharky is right, there is a good dose of lag (I guess stock headers & cats). Although the same output (550ish FWHP) did run a 10.7 @130 or so a couple of year back in the shootout!
Am I off here or did I bring up a valid point?
in a 1/4 the gt2 is faster.... where is the lag???
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
RENN 12,
just to be clear, what octane did the CAR have in it for the dyno.
It may be confusing becuase you STORE you high ocane fuel at the
dyno place. That does not mean you were running it in that car at the
time of dyno...
Marty K.
just to be clear, what octane did the CAR have in it for the dyno.
It may be confusing becuase you STORE you high ocane fuel at the
dyno place. That does not mean you were running it in that car at the
time of dyno...
Marty K.
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
One thing I dont understand.... we always negate the k24s... as laggy.... but why dont we ever make that connection to the gt2- after all it has the very same k24s.... and yet praise the performance...
Am I off here or did I bring up a valid point?
in a 1/4 the gt2 is faster.... where is the lag???
Am I off here or did I bring up a valid point?
in a 1/4 the gt2 is faster.... where is the lag???
Hey Joe, maybe this means instead of the 700 you should do the 800? You know have a bit more lag;P
Originally Posted by sharkster
Exactly the point I was making.. On a GT2 the K24s and their lag are a good balance. On the heavier AWD TT, there's no need for the lag. You can put the power down very easily with quicker spooling turbos
Hey Joe, maybe this means instead of the 700 you should do the 800? You know have a bit more lag;P
Hey Joe, maybe this means instead of the 700 you should do the 800? You know have a bit more lag;P





