996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

drove the gallardo today

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #31  
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,768
From: Maui
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by Johnny USA
Anyone here remember or have a link to the Autocar Magazine test with 996TT x-50 vs Murcielago vs Pagani Zonda. The Zonda won but the x-50 took out the Murci!!!! Anyone have this article?
You actually believe anything that Autocar says? They tested the Murcielago at 13.00 in the 1/4, and printed at time of 12.8 or something at 128mph for a Gt2. Im sorry guys, i love Porsche, but a stock Gt2 cant come close to 128mph in the 1/4.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #32  
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,768
From: Maui
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by Duane
I think a stock X50 will take the gallardo!!
No, its not. Gallardo is quicker.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 08:06 PM
  #33  
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,768
From: Maui
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by ColorChange
CJV You are so right! I tried modding my Lambo, $45k and 40-50 hp later, it still hurts.
What did you do that cost so much and did so little? Who did the work? Theres actually quite a bit you can do.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #34  
Chordate's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,293
From: New York, NY; Pittsburgh, PA
Rep Power: 0
Chordate is infamous around these parts
Unless you want to add turbo-superchargers, I dont think there is much you can to to a N/A car.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 08:23 PM
  #35  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Theres actually quite a bit you can do
Care to be a bit more specific. Nothing against a Lambo. I use to have one years ago. They are very nice looking, but power wise, the new ones a somewhat akind to a heavy boat.
 

Last edited by cjv; Jan 22, 2004 at 09:17 PM.
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #36  
sharkster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 23,879
Rep Power: 1517
sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !
I bet Alex could take us in his lol
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #37  
sharkster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 23,879
Rep Power: 1517
sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !
Originally posted by allanlambo
You actually believe anything that Autocar says? They tested the Murcielago at 13.00 in the 1/4, and printed at time of 12.8 or something at 128mph for a Gt2. Im sorry guys, i love Porsche, but a stock Gt2 cant come close to 128mph in the 1/4.
Er that's not quite right.. Best I've seen/read for the GT2 is 11.9 at 121.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:25 PM
  #38  
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,768
From: Maui
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
Yes, the numbers you quote are spot on. Autocars are completely off.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #39  
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,768
From: Maui
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by cjv
Care to be a bit more specific. Nothing against a Lambo. I use to have one years ago. They are very nice looking, but power wise, the new ones a somewhat akind to a heavy boat.
Well my SV is lighter than a 996TT, with alot more power. The Murcielago is heavier than a 996TT, but it has quite abit more power to overcome the weight disadvantage. Gallardo weighs about the same as a 996TT, with more power also.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:30 PM
  #40  
Chordate's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,293
From: New York, NY; Pittsburgh, PA
Rep Power: 0
Chordate is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by allanlambo
Well my SV is lighter than a 996TT, with alot more power. The Murcielago is heavier than a 996TT, but it has quite abit more power to overcome the weight disadvantage. Gallardo weighs about the same as a 996TT, with more power also.
I think chad wanted to know what aftermarket mods you can do with a Lamborghini.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:30 PM
  #41  
lcheng's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 71
From: san jose, ca
Rep Power: 25
lcheng is infamous around these parts
Road & Track tested both the X50 and Murci for 0-100mph-0 in 2003, X50 won. It also beat the new Viper and Saleen S7 (the S7 has lousy brake) in the same contest. I guess the X50 do better in acceleration than what its power to weight ratio predicts.
Lawrence
03TTX50
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:32 PM
  #42  
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,768
From: Maui
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
As for mods to the Countach, on my 87 Qv, i ripped the exhaust and cats out, along with all the smog equipment. Then i had a custom exhaust with no cats fabricated. Then i replaced the ignition system with a distributorless Electromotive unit. Next the Bosch Cis injection came out, replaced with a Electromotive tech 2 Electronic fuel injection system. Never dynoed the car, but the difference in power was absolutely night and day. Id say right around 100hp for less than 10,000. Then on the Lambos people change cams, headers make big power gains, port the heads, extrude hone the intake, larger throttle bodies. Of course, not as easy as a turbo charged car, but still things you can do. not to mention Nitrous like i run on my cars.

Has anyone seen the 1200Rear wheel hp Diablo?
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:33 PM
  #43  
allanlambo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,768
From: Maui
Rep Power: 0
allanlambo is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by lcheng
Road & Track tested both the X50 and Murci for 0-100mph-0 in 2003, X50 won. It also beat the new Viper and Saleen S7 (the S7 has lousy brake) in the same contest. I guess the X50 do better in acceleration than what its power to weight ratio predicts.
Lawrence
03TTX50
If you drove a Murci and an x50, youd now there is no comparison. A Gt2, yes, but X-50 is not in the ballpark.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 09:46 PM
  #44  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Well my SV is lighter than a 996TT, with alot more power. The Murcielago is heavier than a 996TT, but it has quite abit more power to overcome the weight disadvantage. Gallardo weighs about the same as a 996TT, with more power also.
allanlambo,

The point is, you are not going to get much more power out of either of the above mentioned cars. On the other hand, the 996tt can be modified easily. There are many 996tt turners available and pricing is competitive. Do you really believe a street legal lambo would stand a chance against some of the faster modified 996tt's on this board. If so depending on where you are located in the US, I'm sure we could arrange a little contest. Heck we have some slightly modified 996tt's in Northern and Southern California, Arizona, Kansas, Michigan, Flordia that would probably be available.
 
Old Jan 22, 2004 | 10:03 PM
  #45  
sharkster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 23,879
Rep Power: 1517
sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !sharkster Is a GOD !
Chad too bad your car and mine are stock otherwise we could throw down the gauntlet
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 AM.