996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

New Cadillac CTS-V

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #16  
Y65MPH's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 696
From: NJ
Rep Power: 51
Y65MPH is infamous around these partsY65MPH is infamous around these parts
First off I own a Cadillac dealership. The XLR is not overpriced. We have a full years allocation sold at over MSRP. It is $20000 less than a same equipped SL500 and out performs the SL as well.

I am getting the fist CTS-V in about two weeks. The car is amazing to drive. Very different than the European stuff. Big power and sounds really good, unlike an M3. Best bang for the buck out there.
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #17  
Scott in H-town's Avatar
Pioneer Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,104
From: Houston, Texas
Rep Power: 306
Scott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond reputeScott in H-town has a reputation beyond repute
Originally posted by Y65MPH
First off I own a Cadillac dealership. The XLR is not overpriced. We have a full years allocation sold at over MSRP. It is $20000 less than a same equipped SL500 and out performs the SL as well.

I am getting the fist CTS-V in about two weeks. The car is amazing to drive. Very different than the European stuff. Big power and sounds really good, unlike an M3. Best bang for the buck out there.

I like the XLR, but I'd still pay the extra $20k for an SL. The SL is the most beautiful car inside and out on the road today (non-sports car) IMO. Most people are aren't buying either one for performance... that's down the list of reasons why. Style, image, and comfort are the top 3 for the buyers of these cars.
For Caddy, the problem is styel: it's polarizing... love or hate, image: we've hit it already... old people, and comfort they're probably neck and neck, but the Mercedes has no problems with either of the other 2 reasons.

Seriously, a years' worth? How many is that? That's excellent for the dealers!
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 02:19 PM
  #18  
SHANKENFELTER's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,910
From: Midwest, Southeast
Rep Power: 152
SHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud ofSHANKENFELTER has much to be proud of
Originally posted by Y65MPH
First off I own a Cadillac dealership. The XLR is not overpriced. We have a full years allocation sold at over MSRP. It is $20000 less than a same equipped SL500 and out performs the SL as well.

I am getting the fist CTS-V in about two weeks. The car is amazing to drive. Very different than the European stuff. Big power and sounds really good, unlike an M3. Best bang for the buck out there.
What is the offical 6speedonline member pricing? 20k below msrp?
Come on.........
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 02:31 PM
  #19  
sticky's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 863
From: Anaheim Hills, CA
Rep Power: 57
sticky is infamous around these parts
My mom has an sl500 and the cadillac xlr wasn't even considered as an alternative. Maybe the xlr has a bit more punch, but neither of these cars are fast and the buyers don't care about racing. The sl looks better, has a better interior, many technological gadgets, and is a flashier car. Who would pay 80k for a cadillac?
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 03:10 PM
  #20  
Y65MPH's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 696
From: NJ
Rep Power: 51
Y65MPH is infamous around these partsY65MPH is infamous around these parts
Scott:
On the XLR's we were given 20 for the first year. All sold. (they only hand build 28 a week). Far more exclusive than SL IMO.

Shank:
About $20,000, If I like you maybe a little more.


Sticky:
The person who pays $76,200 for a Cadillac might just be the person who pays $75,000 for a VW Touareg (I'm sorry I meant Cayenne S)

 

Last edited by Y65MPH; Jan 24, 2004 at 03:12 PM.
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 06:37 PM
  #21  
Periokid's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,253
From: LI, NY
Rep Power: 87
Periokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud ofPeriokid has much to be proud of
Originally posted by Y65MPH

The person who pays $76,200 for a Cadillac might just be the person who pays $75,000 for a VW Touareg (I'm sorry I meant Cayenne S)

Hey, I resemble that remark!
 
Old Jan 24, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #22  
SteveH's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,414
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 370
SteveH has much to be proud ofSteveH has much to be proud ofSteveH has much to be proud ofSteveH has much to be proud ofSteveH has much to be proud ofSteveH has much to be proud ofSteveH has much to be proud ofSteveH has much to be proud ofSteveH has much to be proud of
we had a normal CTS and it sucked the big one. there was NO legroom front or back. The interior literally fell apart.
 
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #23  
Mltdown's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 29
From: Angry Hand
Rep Power: 24
Mltdown is infamous around these parts
My post seems to have disappeared. I don’t understand why mags decide to compare the CTS V to the M3&M5, the M5 is a much bigger car. The CTS is a direct competitor to the S4, M3, and C32. All of these cars have nearly the same performance numbers and are all closely priced. Personally I think Cadillac has a far way to go on quality, especially the interior. I have also seen the CTS racecar testing at Gingerman, it made lots of noise and was unimpressive. However, bang for the buck you can’t beat it, just like the Z06. I guess you have to decide how much better quality is worth to you, based on that I would take any(M3, C32, S4)before dropping a penny on the CTS. Atleast Cadillac is trying.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Peach PTT
New Member Introductions
3
Sep 3, 2015 12:31 AM
CraftCustoms
New Member Introductions
0
Sep 1, 2015 09:29 AM
Wheel Experts
American Muscle
0
Aug 19, 2015 09:07 AM
Wheel Experts
Wheels/Tires
0
Aug 19, 2015 09:05 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 PM.