LOl! You guys are a bunh of assclowns. As for fudging the numbers, look up the sources i gave you. NONE OF THE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN FUDGED. Add the Diablos 11.60@121 in the 1/4 time from EVO to your collection.

Thats not a pick of my car btw, but damn sure looks good!

But hey, you guys can keep trying to convince yourselves.

CJV, bring your car to Maui, anytime, and you can keep your 2 second lead. Youll need it.

 

For those that cant read.
Motor Trend:
996TT= 0-60=3.9 11.9@116
996TT x50 3.7 11.9@ 119.9
gt2 3.8 12.1@ 120.0
Murcielago- 3.5 11.7@122.6
Diablo 3.6 11.80 @ 122

Top Gear
Headline reads" Lambo Genius, v10 Lambo blows the Porsche 911 Turbo and Ferrari 360 Away"

Car Magazine "NEW WORLD ORDER Why Lamborghinis Gallardo beats the 911 turbo and Ferrari 360 Cs"

Evo Magazine
Lambo Murci- 0-60=4.0
Lambo DIablo 3.8
Diablo Gt 4.1 (in the wet) 0-100mph in 8.3 in the wet
Porsche 996 TT 0-60=4.1
Gt2 4.1
Gt2 recieved 4 1/2 stars, all Lambos 5 stars

Since you included the 993TT in some of your tests heres the 993TT vs a Diablo Vt from Wheels Mag 1996:
Diablo Vt 1/4 mile 12.3@192Kmh
Recorded a speed on the Millbrock Bowl of 184mph
Porsche 993TT
1/4 13.0@ 175kmh
Reached 172kmh

Last, Motor magazine June 2001, Lambo Diablo Vs Porsche 996TT

Appart from the obvious comments of how the Lambo was faster, but the Porsche quicker over B-roads this sums up the whole deal:
"Alongside the Diablo, the Porsche is invisible"

Performance:
"Porsche 0-200kmh in 15 seconds flat! But the Diablo is faster, stronger,heavier. The results are neither subtle nor insubstantial. THEYRE CRUSHING. 0-200kmh in 12.8 seconds"

Best part:
In its earlier incarnations, the 911 Turbo has been almost as savage, vicious and demanding of respect as the Diablo. But the 996TT is a far cry from those days. But long may there be cars like the DIablo, because its a stand alone event. Atmosphere,sparkle,crackle and illogical appeal like no other car maker has ever truly provided. Standing still, its an event, fire it up, its an event. Hammer it? Yep! its an event the likes of which Porsche owners will never have the chance to comprehend."

Ill get more magazines later.

Dont forget to read the last paragraph, over and over. Its sums everything up nicely.

 

Wait... is that Allens face in the Official 6speed hammerhead pic?

 

No, its definately not. Its Shanks twin brother.

 

i still think the upsolute car could beat the lambo.

 

I guess we'll find out, since i plan on putting an upsolute chip in the Porsche first.

 

Yeah but since you have no credibility, we wont know the truth.

However, your out dated used 1998 Diablo SV would not beat an upsolute chipped turbo.

 

.

 

Skank, has nothing better to do but change peoples posts. Shouldnt you be watching Herbie the Love bug?

 

thank you Shank

 

Ellen, no need to state the obvious

 

Yup, that is the time I posted further up on this thread.


Lou

 

Here it is:

http://www.track-challenge.com/main_...r1=53%26Car2=4

Lou

 

Poor Skank.

 

If you want to talk about the Diablo Gt, Road and Track did a compro between it and the 520hp RUF, saying the Diablo had the most violent acceleration. The Ruf posted a 205mph speed, the Diablo just under 203. Kick is, the Diablo did it in the rain, hydroplaning out of the last turn. They noted the Diablo could have gone faster.