UMW Stage 3A Zero Clearance Breaks New Ground: Dyno Sheet
Great numbers!
Just for a friendly comparison, how does this setup (or the upcoming 3b setup) compare with protomotive's (ex. Markski's)?
I know they are different tunings with different goals overall but with the same boost (say 1.3bar) and within the same rpm range (2k-7k), how do think these 2 stack up?
Thanks.
Just for a friendly comparison, how does this setup (or the upcoming 3b setup) compare with protomotive's (ex. Markski's)?
I know they are different tunings with different goals overall but with the same boost (say 1.3bar) and within the same rpm range (2k-7k), how do think these 2 stack up?
Thanks.
Originally Posted by geetee
Great numbers!
Just for a friendly comparison, how does this setup (or the upcoming 3b setup) compare with protomotive's (ex. Markski's)?
I know they are different tunings with different goals overall but with the same boost (say 1.3bar) and within the same rpm range (2k-7k), how do think these 2 stack up?
Thanks.
Just for a friendly comparison, how does this setup (or the upcoming 3b setup) compare with protomotive's (ex. Markski's)?
I know they are different tunings with different goals overall but with the same boost (say 1.3bar) and within the same rpm range (2k-7k), how do think these 2 stack up?
Thanks.
Originally Posted by geetee
Great numbers!
Just for a friendly comparison, how does this setup (or the upcoming 3b setup) compare with protomotive's (ex. Markski's)?
I know they are different tunings with different goals overall but with the same boost (say 1.3bar) and within the same rpm range (2k-7k), how do think these 2 stack up?
Thanks.
Just for a friendly comparison, how does this setup (or the upcoming 3b setup) compare with protomotive's (ex. Markski's)?
I know they are different tunings with different goals overall but with the same boost (say 1.3bar) and within the same rpm range (2k-7k), how do think these 2 stack up?
Thanks.
The numbers for three 3b arent out yet, but beware of the Killer B's
.As far as Marks car, you cant compare, that is a one off car! but it would be nice for comparisons
. Besides Marks car will destroy anything above 160,than when the xtra HP comes in to play.
Last edited by topgun; Jan 18, 2007 at 09:35 PM.
Yea, Markski's car is a true beast that is for sure. But I just wonder if someone could do a comparison with same boost (say 1 or 1.3 bar) within same rpms(2k -7k rpms).
With the extra boost (1.5 bar with protomotive) and with the extra 1200 rpms and of course the extra power within the 2000-7000rpm's, there is no doubt protomotive will destroy.
But not everyone can afford the protomotive treatment.
How about a comparison with the evo gt700 vs. UMW 3a vs. scott's proto 600? These all 3 are similar in price and all use stock internals right? I know all 3 were done on different dynos and different conditions but I think it would be a give us a good idea.
With the extra boost (1.5 bar with protomotive) and with the extra 1200 rpms and of course the extra power within the 2000-7000rpm's, there is no doubt protomotive will destroy.
But not everyone can afford the protomotive treatment.
How about a comparison with the evo gt700 vs. UMW 3a vs. scott's proto 600? These all 3 are similar in price and all use stock internals right? I know all 3 were done on different dynos and different conditions but I think it would be a give us a good idea.
Originally Posted by geetee
How about a comparison with the evo gt700 vs. UMW 3a vs. scott's proto 600? These all 3 are similar in price and all use stock internals right? I know all 3 were done on different dynos and different conditions but I think it would be a give us a good idea.
Thats correct, but keep in mind that this will just become another numbers war. We need three cars at the same time, same dyno...to be legit.
Originally Posted by geetee
Yea, Markski's car is a true beast that is for sure. But I just wonder if someone could do a comparison with same boost (say 1 or 1.3 bar) within same rpms(2k -7k rpms).
With the extra boost (1.5 bar with protomotive) and with the extra 1200 rpms and of course the extra power within the 2000-7000rpm's, there is no doubt protomotive will destroy.
But not everyone can afford the protomotive treatment.
How about a comparison with the evo gt700 vs. UMW 3a vs. scott's proto 600? These all 3 are similar in price and all use stock internals right? I know all 3 were done on different dynos and different conditions but I think it would be a give us a good idea.
With the extra boost (1.5 bar with protomotive) and with the extra 1200 rpms and of course the extra power within the 2000-7000rpm's, there is no doubt protomotive will destroy.
But not everyone can afford the protomotive treatment.
How about a comparison with the evo gt700 vs. UMW 3a vs. scott's proto 600? These all 3 are similar in price and all use stock internals right? I know all 3 were done on different dynos and different conditions but I think it would be a give us a good idea.
Hopefully we can all get some good numbers when the weather improves. Kevin
Originally Posted by jags911tt
So does the 3a kit make 590awfpt and 640awhp?
jag
jag
Kevin
Originally Posted by KPG
Jags, the higher one is race fuel the other sheet is pump fuel. I think 720ish pump and 780ish race fuel, but the big tq down low is still there regardless of fuel. Wait til I put on heads and rods
Kevin
KevinJag
Originally Posted by jags911tt
Nice - but you didnt answer my question - is it all wheel? Does the dynopack measure power at all four wheels?
Jag
Jag



