From OEM IC -> EVO IC's with K24 more Turbo lag?
Originally Posted by oak
If I remember correctly most that installed the headers that had dynneoed lost hp in the 996tt. curious, do a dyno before and after let us know!
Old
New
here is de difference at EVO/IA dyno, compare S2 and S3:

I hope it helps
Last edited by Pierre996TT; May 29, 2007 at 05:54 PM.
they look nice, I have a feeling my turbo is too low for those. do they hang lower than the the stock? I think there was a few that had problem with the headers bottoming out. if they are the same ones.
Originally Posted by oak
they look nice, I have a feeling my turbo is too low for those. do they hang lower than the the stock? I think there was a few that had problem with the headers bottoming out. if they are the same ones.
..... today, I take the Cayenne when I have to go out of town.
The stock TT IC's will not, I repeat will not sufficiently cool the air for a stage 4 TT. You WILL get heat soak. You WILL eventually damage your turbos and engine. It is not a performance/hp issue (although when my friend swapped out his stock IC's and hoses for my old GT2 IC's and silicone boost hoses he claimed there was less lag, according to his butt dyno).
I forgot to mention that in addition to Kaspar, Knighton, and the local Porsche mechs, Rob King also stated that the stock TT IC's would result in heat soak on a 500 whp/K24 TT.
I forgot to mention that in addition to Kaspar, Knighton, and the local Porsche mechs, Rob King also stated that the stock TT IC's would result in heat soak on a 500 whp/K24 TT.
Last edited by Dr_jitsu; May 29, 2007 at 09:36 PM.
Originally Posted by Dr_jitsu
The stock TT headers will not, I repeat will not sufficiently cool the air for a stage 4 TT. You WILL get heat soak.
BTW where is your data to support this?
Fixed...Ask Stephen, I think he has some data on this issue. However, it is just basic common sense: You have a lot more air flowing in and out you will need a lot more cooling.
Why does Porsche use a bigger IC (GT2/X50) with the K 24's than it does w/ the K 16's?
It seems I am wasting my breath trying to save this guys engine/turbos so good luck to you all.
Why does Porsche use a bigger IC (GT2/X50) with the K 24's than it does w/ the K 16's?
It seems I am wasting my breath trying to save this guys engine/turbos so good luck to you all.
Last edited by Dr_jitsu; May 29, 2007 at 09:41 PM.
I agree with Dr. Jitsu on this one.
Why wouldn't better than the measly stock intercoolers be advised
on a Stage 4 K-24 car? In other words: what would Porsche suggest
using their K-24 turbos and running higher boost? At a minimum I would think
one would want the GT2 IC's, especially since everyone that sells them sells
them so cheap.
MK
Why wouldn't better than the measly stock intercoolers be advised
on a Stage 4 K-24 car? In other words: what would Porsche suggest
using their K-24 turbos and running higher boost? At a minimum I would think
one would want the GT2 IC's, especially since everyone that sells them sells
them so cheap.
MK
I would say that if you are street driving your car, just get the gt2/X50 intercoolers and call it a day. They are already 25% bigger and more efficient.
I think the reason Porsche used K24s and larger intercoolers on the GT2/X50/TurboS cars while running little more boost (.1 BAR) has to more with overall efficiency on the track. The K24s push much cooler air and the larger intercoolers add to the efficiency. This combination makes for the most effective track combination at the expense of a little lag due to larger turbos and intercoolers.
If you are driving your stage 4 car on the street only, you simply can not begin to duplicate the heat produced by a stock car running lap after lap on a tight road course at high ambient temperatures.
My opinion is get factory K24 ICs and be done with it. Now if you plan on tracking your car, aftermarket ICs start to make more sense.
I think the reason Porsche used K24s and larger intercoolers on the GT2/X50/TurboS cars while running little more boost (.1 BAR) has to more with overall efficiency on the track. The K24s push much cooler air and the larger intercoolers add to the efficiency. This combination makes for the most effective track combination at the expense of a little lag due to larger turbos and intercoolers.
If you are driving your stage 4 car on the street only, you simply can not begin to duplicate the heat produced by a stock car running lap after lap on a tight road course at high ambient temperatures.
My opinion is get factory K24 ICs and be done with it. Now if you plan on tracking your car, aftermarket ICs start to make more sense.
Last edited by Turbo Fanatic; May 30, 2007 at 10:44 PM.
Originally Posted by ari
I would say that if you are street driving your car, just get the gt2/X50 intercoolers and call it a day. They are already 25% bigger and more efficient.
I doubt they are even 10 percent more like 5 maybe. just longer cooling fins not even .100" difference same amount of internal surface area from what I can tell.
I have k24/26 turbos and run them at the track in summer heat at BW and WS and have never experienced heat soak at the track.
I have k24/26 turbos and run them at the track in summer heat at BW and WS and have never experienced heat soak at the track.
Originally Posted by Pierre996TT
I do not track the car and I really do not want to increase the turbo lag in fact decrease it. I am concern on reduce the pressure installing such a big IC as well as not justifying the $$ for no track use.
Can somebody tell me or share some of your experience about EVO ClubSport Intercoolers? Does the lag decreases?



