996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

From OEM IC -> EVO IC's with K24 more Turbo lag?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 05:50 PM
  #31  
Pierre996TT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,035
From: Lo Barnechea & Viņa del Mar
Rep Power: 66
Pierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura about
Cool

Originally Posted by oak
If I remember correctly most that installed the headers that had dynneoed lost hp in the 996tt. curious, do a dyno before and after let us know!
I had the old design headers (same for K16 and K24), are the ones that merge one collector tube to the flange. The new version have different collector and make power. Look closely and you will see:

Old



New



here is de difference at EVO/IA dyno, compare S2 and S3:



I hope it helps
 

Last edited by Pierre996TT; May 29, 2007 at 05:54 PM.
Old May 29, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #32  
oak's Avatar
oak
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,741
From: So Bay, LA
Rep Power: 142
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
they look nice, I have a feeling my turbo is too low for those. do they hang lower than the the stock? I think there was a few that had problem with the headers bottoming out. if they are the same ones.
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #33  
Pierre996TT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,035
From: Lo Barnechea & Viņa del Mar
Rep Power: 66
Pierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura aboutPierre996TT has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by oak
they look nice, I have a feeling my turbo is too low for those. do they hang lower than the the stock? I think there was a few that had problem with the headers bottoming out. if they are the same ones.
Well, yes and that is the reason because I needed to change my old headers, I did slam one ..... today, I take the Cayenne when I have to go out of town.
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #34  
oak's Avatar
oak
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,741
From: So Bay, LA
Rep Power: 142
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
mmm.....boohhkay, well such goes the mods. in the end it's just money and time. as long as you enjoy it.
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #35  
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 673
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
The stock TT IC's will not, I repeat will not sufficiently cool the air for a stage 4 TT. You WILL get heat soak. You WILL eventually damage your turbos and engine. It is not a performance/hp issue (although when my friend swapped out his stock IC's and hoses for my old GT2 IC's and silicone boost hoses he claimed there was less lag, according to his butt dyno).

I forgot to mention that in addition to Kaspar, Knighton, and the local Porsche mechs, Rob King also stated that the stock TT IC's would result in heat soak on a 500 whp/K24 TT.
 

Last edited by Dr_jitsu; May 29, 2007 at 09:36 PM.
Old May 29, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #36  
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,660
Rep Power: 254
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Dr_jitsu
The stock TT headers will not, I repeat will not sufficiently cool the air for a stage 4 TT. You WILL get heat soak.
You of course mean ICs as headers do not cool squat. BTW where is your data to support this?
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 09:38 PM
  #37  
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 673
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
Fixed...Ask Stephen, I think he has some data on this issue. However, it is just basic common sense: You have a lot more air flowing in and out you will need a lot more cooling.

Why does Porsche use a bigger IC (GT2/X50) with the K 24's than it does w/ the K 16's?

It seems I am wasting my breath trying to save this guys engine/turbos so good luck to you all.
 

Last edited by Dr_jitsu; May 29, 2007 at 09:41 PM.
Old May 29, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #38  
WOODTSTER's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,710
From: MPLS, MN USA
Rep Power: 466
WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !
Lightbulb Stock IC vs GT2 IC vs Evoms IC (when needed?)

I agree with Dr. Jitsu on this one.
Why wouldn't better than the measly stock intercoolers be advised
on a Stage 4 K-24 car? In other words: what would Porsche suggest
using their K-24 turbos and running higher boost? At a minimum I would think
one would want the GT2 IC's, especially since everyone that sells them sells
them so cheap.

MK
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 11:48 PM
  #39  
oak's Avatar
oak
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,741
From: So Bay, LA
Rep Power: 142
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
for turbo's, exhaust gases are much better flowing when maintaining the heat from combustion. you get better performance if you are able to maintain the heat in the headers.
 
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #40  
Turbo Fanatic's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,880
From: In a Canyon - Really :)
Rep Power: 290
Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !
I would say that if you are street driving your car, just get the gt2/X50 intercoolers and call it a day. They are already 25% bigger and more efficient.

I think the reason Porsche used K24s and larger intercoolers on the GT2/X50/TurboS cars while running little more boost (.1 BAR) has to more with overall efficiency on the track. The K24s push much cooler air and the larger intercoolers add to the efficiency. This combination makes for the most effective track combination at the expense of a little lag due to larger turbos and intercoolers.

If you are driving your stage 4 car on the street only, you simply can not begin to duplicate the heat produced by a stock car running lap after lap on a tight road course at high ambient temperatures.

My opinion is get factory K24 ICs and be done with it. Now if you plan on tracking your car, aftermarket ICs start to make more sense.
 

Last edited by Turbo Fanatic; May 30, 2007 at 10:44 PM.
Old May 30, 2007 | 01:01 AM
  #41  
SallyMobile's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 981
From: NV
Rep Power: 61
SallyMobile is a jewel in the roughSallyMobile is a jewel in the roughSallyMobile is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by ari
I would say that if you are street driving your car, just get the gt2/X50 intercoolers and call it a day. They are already 25% bigger and more efficient.
I thought they were only 10% bigger and even that was debatable (only slightly larger fins, no difference in tubes).
 
Old May 30, 2007 | 01:34 AM
  #42  
oak's Avatar
oak
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,741
From: So Bay, LA
Rep Power: 142
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
I doubt they are even 10 percent more like 5 maybe. just longer cooling fins not even .100" difference same amount of internal surface area from what I can tell.

I have k24/26 turbos and run them at the track in summer heat at BW and WS and have never experienced heat soak at the track.
 
Old May 30, 2007 | 08:24 AM
  #43  
PorschePhd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,670
Rep Power: 189
PorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond repute
The offical PCNA number was 5% more efficent.
 
Old May 30, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #44  
WOODTSTER's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,710
From: MPLS, MN USA
Rep Power: 466
WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !WOODTSTER Is a GOD !
Thanks Doc,

Any other thoughts on the subject, IE when to do intercoolers
(I am doing Proto's Custom ones right now) ??

MK
 
Old May 30, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #45  
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,660
Rep Power: 254
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Pierre996TT

I do not track the car and I really do not want to increase the turbo lag in fact decrease it. I am concern on reduce the pressure installing such a big IC as well as not justifying the $$ for no track use.
Can somebody tell me or share some of your experience about EVO ClubSport Intercoolers? Does the lag decreases?
Guys, I think the debate about ICs is good, but in answering the original question and follow-up by Pierre...ICs have no effect on lag. They cool the air going into the turbos, thus providing more dense air leading to more potential power. Whether the GT2 or EVO ICs do this better than stock (given Pierre's driving environment) is of course debatable...whether they are worth the money...once again debatable. My advice Pierre is given your initial question and follow-up...ICs will not be worth it. You do not track your car and the temperature is like San Diego...I doubt you get anywhere near heat soak...Save your money for other mods...
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM.