996 Previous model naturally aspirated Porsche 911 community. Discuss C2, C2s, C4, C4s, Targa and Cabriolets.

Light weight flywheel and shorter gearing

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #16  
Staff@RPM's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 483
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 39
Staff@RPM is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by John Romano
I'm going to need to replace my clutch soon. Since I am, I was thinking of Getting the GMG Clutch/Lightweight flywheel package. Does anyone have any impressions on this set up?

While the transaxle is out I figured I might as well upgrade to the steel syncros and perhaps change the gearing a little to shorten up 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. And/or change the final drive to something like 4:11. I don't really need to go 170. Blasting from 60 to 120 like a rocket is more to my liking. What would I notice with a light weight flywheel and shorter gearing?
Hi John, There is no final drive gearing changes for your trans axle. As for changing the gears for 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Porsche did just that in the 997s models, they spaced them out for the increased power of the 3.8 motor. I would try to go that route. With a S/C in the mix it is a must. The supercharged cars really start to pull in 4th gear. I will update the gear ratios Monday.
Tim
 
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #17  
pjalexandre's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 289
From: Virginia
Rep Power: 31
pjalexandre is infamous around these parts
Don't claim to know anything about either company's product. But this is a simple thing as to why/why not.

The stock setup uses a unsprung clutch and a dual mass flywheel. The dual mass flywheel absorbs the driveline chatter.

If you replace the dual mass flywheel with a lwfw that is single mass (unsprung) then there is nothing absorbing the chatter anymore... unless you replace the clutch with a sprung unit.

Perhaps that is the difference in GMG?? dunno.

Originally Posted by John Romano
GMG insists their LWFW/clutch package does not chatter. I wonder if that's true. It can't be rocket science, so why would EVO's chatter and GMG's not?
 
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 10:26 AM
  #18  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
The SC will pull in every gear. It is engine speed dependent and not gear dependent. I would install the SC first as you may find no gearing changes are necessary with the increased power. You definately won't have to change out 1st or 2nd gear unless you want to go taller.
 
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #19  
John Romano's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 756
From: South florida
Rep Power: 51
John Romano is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by 1999Porsche911
The SC will pull in every gear. It is engine speed dependent and not gear dependent. I would install the SC first as you may find no gearing changes are necessary with the increased power. You definately won't have to change out 1st or 2nd gear unless you want to go taller.
That's exactly my problem. Logically, I would wait to SC the car then determine which gearing mods would be appropriate. I was hoping to find someone who already went this route and figured out the best way to go. I'd like to only have to drop the transaxle one time - get it all done: clutch, fly wheel, LSD, syncros, and gearing all in one shot now in anticipation of the SC.

Out of all the SCed cars out there someone must have dealt with gearing. Anyone?
 
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 07:10 PM
  #20  
Staff@RPM's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 483
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 39
Staff@RPM is infamous around these parts
Hi, The more power you make the longer your gears should be. The longer gear lets the power be used. Short gears feel fast but will be slower if the longer gear are sized correct.
02 C2 05 C2S
1st 3.82 1st 3.91
2nd 2.20 2nd 2.32
3rd 1.52 3rd 1.61
4th 1.22 4th 1.28
5th 1.02 5th 1.08
6th 0.84 6th 0.88
Final 3.55 Final 3.55
also the S runs a 305/30/19 vs the 285/30/18 witch effects the overall drive number. In 4th gear the car has time to use its power so it really starts to move(watching the speedo not the tach). Also my turbo ran a 139.9 trap speed top of 4th instead of shifting 5th and losing momentum( no room for 5th gear shift in the 1/4) I will increase my tire roll out to increase my final drive number and go faster at the top of 4th.
Tim
 
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #21  
newport996's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,187
From: Newport Beach, Ca.
Rep Power: 150
newport996 is infamous around these partsnewport996 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by pjalexandre
Don't claim to know anything about either company's product. But this is a simple thing as to why/why not.

The stock setup uses a unsprung clutch and a dual mass flywheel. The dual mass flywheel absorbs the driveline chatter.

If you replace the dual mass flywheel with a lwfw that is single mass (unsprung) then there is nothing absorbing the chatter anymore... unless you replace the clutch with a sprung unit.

Perhaps that is the difference in GMG?? dunno.
GMG has a specially designed clutch made by Sachs....this clutch and flywheels combo they guarantee not to chatter.
 
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 09:47 PM
  #22  
John Romano's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 756
From: South florida
Rep Power: 51
John Romano is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Staff@RPM
Hi, The more power you make the longer your gears should be. The longer gear lets the power be used. Short gears feel fast but will be slower if the longer gear are sized correct.
02 C2 05 C2S
1st 3.82 1st 3.91
2nd 2.20 2nd 2.32
3rd 1.52 3rd 1.61
4th 1.22 4th 1.28
5th 1.02 5th 1.08
6th 0.84 6th 0.88
Final 3.55 Final 3.55
also the S runs a 305/30/19 vs the 285/30/18 witch effects the overall drive number. In 4th gear the car has time to use its power so it really starts to move(watching the speedo not the tach). Also my turbo ran a 139.9 trap speed top of 4th instead of shifting 5th and losing momentum( no room for 5th gear shift in the 1/4) I will increase my tire roll out to increase my final drive number and go faster at the top of 4th.
Tim
Overall. you are talking about speed, not acceleration, right? I'm really concerned more with drivability in the environment in which I spend most of my driving time. I don't have much opportunity, nor the desire, to go 180. But pinning my head back in the seat during short blasts to the other side of 100 interests me. Wouldn't shortening 2nd - 4th bring on harder acceleration with added power of forced induction, or are you saying that the lower gearing will make the motor just run out of revs faster but not accelerate as hard?
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 07:18 AM
  #23  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by John Romano
Overall. you are talking about speed, not acceleration, right? I'm really concerned more with drivability in the environment in which I spend most of my driving time. I don't have much opportunity, nor the desire, to go 180. But pinning my head back in the seat during short blasts to the other side of 100 interests me. Wouldn't shortening 2nd - 4th bring on harder acceleration with added power of forced induction, or are you saying that the lower gearing will make the motor just run out of revs faster but not accelerate as hard?
Shortening any of the first 3 gears with an SC will make the car very uncomfortable to drive and as I stated before, will slow the car down on it's way to 100 mph. There is plenty of neck stressing power with the stock gears if you shift at the right points.

Any gain from shortening the gears will be more than offset by the additional shifting you will have to do. If changing gears is in your blood, make the first 4 gears taller.
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 07:27 AM
  #24  
John Romano's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 756
From: South florida
Rep Power: 51
John Romano is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by 1999Porsche911
Shortening any of the first 3 gears with an SC will make the car very uncomfortable to drive and as I stated before, will slow the car down on it's way to 100 mph. There is plenty of neck stressing power with the stock gears if you shift at the right points.

Any gain from shortening the gears will be more than offset by the additional shifting you will have to do. If changing gears is in your blood, make the first 4 gears taller.
Interesting. Thank you. It makes sense now. I often see this term "shift points." I'm assuming this is the point where the torque curve levels off? I have the worst time up shifting smoothly from 1st to 2nd. Winding out in first seems to last about 1 second and the rev limiter is right there. I can't seem to find that point where 2nd just takes over from 1st. I usually get this kind of double jerk happening and then the car settles back in to accelerating. 2nd gear lasts much longer and my up shift from 2nd to 3rd is nearly seamless, as are the following shifts. Is the "shift point" from 1st to 2nd lower in the rev range because the gearing is so low? I'm wondering if 1st will even be usable with another 150 HP. What am I doing wrong?
 

Last edited by John Romano; Mar 11, 2008 at 07:42 AM.
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #25  
Redridge's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,001
From: NJ
Rep Power: 150
Redridge has much to be proud ofRedridge has much to be proud ofRedridge has much to be proud ofRedridge has much to be proud ofRedridge has much to be proud ofRedridge has much to be proud ofRedridge has much to be proud ofRedridge has much to be proud of
my experience is in 3rd and 4th is where the car seems fastest and by the time you hit 5th, your deep into 3 digits. 3rd and 4th is where you'll feel the pull the most.
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #26  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by John Romano
Interesting. Thank you. It makes sense now. I often see this term "shift points." I'm assuming this is the point where the torque curve levels off? I have the worst time up shifting smoothly from 1st to 2nd. Winding out in first seems to last about 1 second and the rev limiter is right there. I can't seem to find that point where 2nd just takes over from 1st. I usually get this kind of double jerk happening and then the car settles back in to accelerating. 2nd gear lasts much longer and my up shift from 2nd to 3rd is nearly seamless, as are the following shifts. Is the "shift point" from 1st to 2nd lower in the rev range because the gearing is so low? I'm wondering if 1st will even be usable with another 150 HP. What am I doing wrong?

With a centrifuge compressor on the car, your best shift points are at or near redline in each gear. With the blower, you must be very focused while at WOT in 1st gear. If you blink, you hit the rev limiter. Remember that your tach does not reflect the actually engine speed while accelerating so quickly. Learn to shift from the sound of your engine in all gears.
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #27  
3deep's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 162
From: bay area,ca
Rep Power: 0
3deep is infamous around these parts3deep is infamous around these parts3deep is infamous around these parts3deep is infamous around these parts
Vortech blowers typically kick in around 4K to redline.So think about where you want your power and how you drive.Like 1999 said get the blower first or drive someones car and get a feel for it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
J9277655
Automobiles For Sale
1
Dec 28, 2015 11:01 PM
Sales@RSW
GT3/GT2
7
Sep 3, 2015 09:34 AM
GSR Autosport
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
0
Aug 26, 2015 05:20 PM
TrackOne
Automobiles For Sale
0
Aug 20, 2015 12:56 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.