02 Carrera or C4S
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 54
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 22
Minor correction to earlier response: there is no such thing as a 996 C2S. If there were, I would have bought one. The 997 has a C2S, but the 996 generation got screwed.
C2 is the best performance, the purist driving experience. It's the lightest and tops all the performance numbers until you get to wet or icy conditions.
C4S is wide-body, which is sexy. Aesthetically it rocks. It is also the choice if you need to deal with bad weather, or want to track it in wet conditions.
Drive them both, figure out what you like and why, then buy it.
I went C2, and I'm very happy. If I were to do it again, I would buy a C2 with factory aero kit.
C2 is the best performance, the purist driving experience. It's the lightest and tops all the performance numbers until you get to wet or icy conditions.
C4S is wide-body, which is sexy. Aesthetically it rocks. It is also the choice if you need to deal with bad weather, or want to track it in wet conditions.
Drive them both, figure out what you like and why, then buy it.
I went C2, and I'm very happy. If I were to do it again, I would buy a C2 with factory aero kit.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 293
From: London
Rep Power: 30
If you're really going to wait around for a 997, think about a 996TT. IMHO if you want the wide body the 4S is worth skipping and going straight for the turbo, so much more bang for your buck...
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17
From: Alabama
Rep Power: 0
Again, all good points. I think I'm going to wait until after the first of the year to pull the trigger. I want to get as much car for my buck and with the market staying soft for a few more months might help getting a C4S or perhaps a TT. Thanks guys for all the feedback.
I hear 'ya...LOL
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 812
From: Dallas
Rep Power: 54
+1.
I drove both and decided on a C2 because in my opinion it had a little more "oomph" due to less weight and the steering felt a little purer.
The C4S has a very different feel to it, and the back end on that beast is arguably one of the best looking business ends ever.
All that aside, I liked the way the C2 drove for my nickel, and inclement weather in Dallas is a non-factor so the utilitarian advantage is null.
Drive them both, and let us know what your impressions were.
I drove both and decided on a C2 because in my opinion it had a little more "oomph" due to less weight and the steering felt a little purer.
The C4S has a very different feel to it, and the back end on that beast is arguably one of the best looking business ends ever.
All that aside, I liked the way the C2 drove for my nickel, and inclement weather in Dallas is a non-factor so the utilitarian advantage is null.
Drive them both, and let us know what your impressions were.
As Ben said drive both, they do drive more differently than many people realize.
At the risk of being flamed I'd say buy the C4S if you are interested in looks, and the C2 if you are interested in perfomance (flamesuit on).
Furthermore, for virtually the same money you can choose between a C4S or and '03 40th anniversary model (that came with the X51 standard as well as many other options).
The C4S looks nice, but the 40th anniversary would be a hands down winner for me.
http://cars.ign.com/articles/432/432700p1.html
At the risk of being flamed I'd say buy the C4S if you are interested in looks, and the C2 if you are interested in perfomance (flamesuit on).
Furthermore, for virtually the same money you can choose between a C4S or and '03 40th anniversary model (that came with the X51 standard as well as many other options).
The C4S looks nice, but the 40th anniversary would be a hands down winner for me.
http://cars.ign.com/articles/432/432700p1.html
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17
From: Alabama
Rep Power: 0
I initially started this search with a Carrera in mind but the rear end of the C4S is so appealing. I'm going to drive them both like you've suggested and feel which one I like the best.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 314
From: North Carolina
Rep Power: 36
Good solution. You have to live with the choice, so it's best for you to see/feel for yourself.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 276
From: norcal
Rep Power: 33
Unless you're already counting 1/100's of a second per pound, in lost lap time, the performance difference between a *base* C2 and a C4S is not something to worry about. Most of the weight difference comes from standard luxury options. Only about 25% of the weight difference between the C2 and C4S is due to AWD. Another small portion comes comes the 4S's large wheels and brake rotors. The rest is all cushy stuff that comes standard on the 4S, and is optional on the C2. A well equipped C2 will have much of that weight too - leaving you the "performance" parts in weight on the 4S. The 4S also has a sport suspension, which a C2 does not - by default. The weight of the AWD, big wheels and big brake rotors can be a handicap, but only if you don't use the grip they offer to your advantage.
Numbers aside, I haven't yet come across a C2 on track that I haven't passed. =)
Also, the US recommend alignment specs for all 911s have them set to under-steer a lot. When you align one properly, it's a whole different story.
Something to look at:
Numbers aside, I haven't yet come across a C2 on track that I haven't passed. =)
Also, the US recommend alignment specs for all 911s have them set to under-steer a lot. When you align one properly, it's a whole different story.
Something to look at: