996 Previous model naturally aspirated Porsche 911 community. Discuss C2, C2s, C4, C4s, Targa and Cabriolets.

No mufflers, no problems?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:29 AM
  #16  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
Originally posted by C4S ESQ
i only use car 2 days a week, and i really look forward to those days.
if it were a DD, it would be a tougher decision, but i'd still do the bypass. i personally think the fabspeed mufflers on the 99 SC'd 996 are way to quiet, but there is nothing i've seen in between.

ZEMDOG--i can't tell you which mod was the best, i did them all together as a package and my car returned a different animal.

1999Porsche911--no need to be condescending (loud=speed). i think it was due to a 'tired' SC'd 996 engine, hence, the explanation that it had 50k plus miles on it (and most were hard with SC). i would fully expect a different result from a 'properly running' car and i never 'claimed' anything different. However, there is not as big a difference between our cars as you think. Now the EVO GT700 that always passes me like i'm standing still is FAST. REALLY FAST.

If you don't want to be challenged, the don't make ridiculus claims. You stated: "BTW, my car as modded picked up more power than advertised. It can run down a stock 997C2S (355 hp) and a 996C2 Evo Supercharged/Fabspeed exhaust (400+hp---50k miles old)" Nothing about either car running bad. The SC'd car must have removed his sepentine belt for you to catch it.
 
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:07 AM
  #17  
C4S ESQ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 63
From: Clearwater/Tampa
Rep Power: 23
C4S ESQ is infamous around these parts
LOL--no belt
 
Old Dec 23, 2005 | 07:48 AM
  #18  
ZEMDOGG's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,521
From: Orlando
Rep Power: 121
ZEMDOGG is infamous around these parts
Ok NC Bob go listen to a FACTORY 996 GT3 Cup Car and tell me if it sounds any different. It dosent. It is loud for street but DAMN does it sound good. Pure porsche no Chevy!
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 08:17 AM
  #19  
SQLDBATx's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17
From: DFW, Tx
Rep Power: 0
SQLDBATx is infamous around these parts
I dont agree

Originally posted by 1999Porsche911
No matter what you do with your NA engine, you will never even stay close to a turbo or SC'd 996. Some people, I guess, believe that the louder the engine, the faster it is.
I don't agree with that comment. There are plenty of interal mods (cam, piston, heads, ect...) that can make an na engine just as powerful a turbo or sc'd car.

As far as the mufflers, yes I totaly agree that its all sound and no added performance other than the 50lbs loss.
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 08:22 AM
  #20  
ZEMDOGG's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,521
From: Orlando
Rep Power: 121
ZEMDOGG is infamous around these parts
No mufflers = better low end torque and throttle response. Horsepower difference is only like 1 or 2hp. Torque overall is only lik 1 or 2. Better drivebility though without a doubt, as long as you r not scared of the sound lol
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 09:10 AM
  #21  
SQLDBATx's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17
From: DFW, Tx
Rep Power: 0
SQLDBATx is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by ZEMDOGG
No mufflers = better low end torque and throttle response. Horsepower difference is only like 1 or 2hp. Torque overall is only lik 1 or 2. Better drivebility though without a doubt, as long as you r not scared of the sound lol

Throttle response is not performance IMO. 1-2hp is not performance IMO.

Adding 10+hp is adding performance but adding 150+hp is adding fun... lol.

The stat's I've seen from the sc kits are pretty poor. 70hp is really good but I'd expect more from an sc. Maybe I'm too used to LS1 engines where adding a 7 to 9psi ATI procharger gives you massive gains.
 

Last edited by SQLDBATx; Dec 24, 2005 at 09:17 AM.
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 09:39 AM
  #22  
ZEMDOGG's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,521
From: Orlando
Rep Power: 121
ZEMDOGG is infamous around these parts
ANY gain is performance. If your a horsepower guy then you probally are one of those guys I would lap on the track. More torqe down low is not a gain?!?!? Isnt that the difference between the 2004 996 and the 2005 997. Welcome to Porsche my friend its not all about horsepower.
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #23  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
Originally posted by SQLDBATx
Throttle response is not performance IMO. 1-2hp is not performance IMO.

Adding 10+hp is adding performance but adding 150+hp is adding fun... lol.

The stat's I've seen from the sc kits are pretty poor. 70hp is really good but I'd expect more from an sc. Maybe I'm too used to LS1 engines where adding a 7 to 9psi ATI procharger gives you massive gains.
Why so little boost in a lower compression engine? You should be pushing 12 or more if you want any substantial power gain out of your LS1. You effective compression ratio is even less than I am running in my 996.
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #24  
karlooz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 978
From: belmont, CA (bay area)
Rep Power: 62
karlooz is infamous around these parts
of course the ls1 kits will make more power. it's got 5.7 ****ing litres behind it . the porsche engines are 3.4-3.6 litres. stock the ls1 is making 345 HP, that's CRAP for 5.7L. the 3.4 makes 300HP and the 3.6L make 320HP.

when you look at the percentages the gains are close but the LS1 STILL need 5.7 fkucing litres .


Originally posted by SQLDBATx
The stat's I've seen from the sc kits are pretty poor. 70hp is really good but I'd expect more from an sc. Maybe I'm too used to LS1 engines where adding a 7 to 9psi ATI procharger gives you massive gains.
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #25  
ZEMDOGG's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,521
From: Orlando
Rep Power: 121
ZEMDOGG is infamous around these parts
Karlooz your the man
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #26  
karlooz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 978
From: belmont, CA (bay area)
Rep Power: 62
karlooz is infamous around these parts
Re: Its worth it!

Originally posted by C4S ESQ
It can run down a stock 997C2S (355 hp) and a 996C2 Evo Supercharged/Fabspeed exhaust (400+hp---50k miles old).
your added performance is more likely due to 50 lbs less weight.

i can believe your modded c4s can run down a 355HP 997 c2s but a 996 EVO SC? i had all the mods you now have and now going having the SC i can say NO CHANCE.
 

Last edited by karlooz; Dec 24, 2005 at 10:10 AM.
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 10:09 AM
  #27  
karlooz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 978
From: belmont, CA (bay area)
Rep Power: 62
karlooz is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by ZEMDOGG
C4S ESQ Does the Giac software really make that much of a difference? I have a 99 Carrera with an 88 pin ECU and most companies dont have easy plug and play software for it. Do you know if it will work on my car?
Im just looking for like 315 horsepower. I think the chip is the final fronteir. I just need to know what works?
dude, did you just totally ignore the other thread you started ? YES it will work on a '99. I had my car flashed and IT WORKED. i had the EVO/GIAC flash, EVO v-flow, headers, exhaust, lightweight flywheel and, FWIW, i got 280RWHP~330HP.
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 10:11 AM
  #28  
ZEMDOGG's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,521
From: Orlando
Rep Power: 121
ZEMDOGG is infamous around these parts
Talking

Karlooz,

Sorry I get side tracked sometimes. Im supposed to be selling Porsches not screwing around on 6 speed lol
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 08:05 PM
  #29  
C4S ESQ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 63
From: Clearwater/Tampa
Rep Power: 23
C4S ESQ is infamous around these parts
Its worth it!

Originally posted by karlooz
your added performance is more likely due to 50 lbs less weight.

i can believe your modded c4s can run down a 355HP 997 c2s but a 996 EVO SC? i had all the mods you now have and now going having the SC i can say NO CHANCE.
i agree with you.
my friend with th 3.4 SCd was on the phone with EVO as soon as we got back from the track. They are guessing blow-by or a leak in boost pipes. he is bringing car in for SC system check and then compression check. but he has no CEL.
 
Old Dec 24, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #30  
deputydog95's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,538
From: North Dakota
Rep Power: 504
deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !
C4S: We could always take a quick run down 275. That should settle this
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 AM.