996 Previous model naturally aspirated Porsche 911 community. Discuss C2, C2s, C4, C4s, Targa and Cabriolets.

Interesting AirFilter test -

Old Jan 12, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #1  
YoopsRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 839
From: Crazy Town USA
Rep Power: 53
YoopsRacing is infamous around these parts
Interesting AirFilter test -

The following website contains a data intensive study of air filters for a General Motors Duramax diesel. Lots of data measured scientifically with flow rates, filtration efficiency and capacities to an ISO 5011 standard.

http://www.duramax-diesel.com/spicer/index.htm


I was considering a K&N...........
 
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #2  
deputydog95's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,538
From: North Dakota
Rep Power: 504
deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !
and?

are you surprised? you can't have both filtration and performance. if you want a performance gain, you're going to have to pass more air. the only way to do that is to reduce filtration. it's a trade off. what's more important to you, picking up a couple HP or limiting the amount of debris in your motor? depending on where you live, i can't imagine the slight reduction in filtration is going to be a big deal.
 
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #3  
WARDHOG's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,996
From: On a laptop
Rep Power: 102
WARDHOG is infamous around these parts
Interesting
 
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
XLR82XS's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,703
From: SW FL
Rep Power: 390
XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !XLR82XS Is a GOD !
I still rock OE paper filter in the S. Works fine and my software is designed for the stock (RS4) airbox.
 
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #5  
GREERJ1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 151
From: Norwood, Ma
Rep Power: 26
GREERJ1 is infamous around these parts
air filters

You can have filtration and performance if you incresase the surface area of the filter. These tests tell you what the filter will do per filter. To increase performance you must decrease the delta p (pressure, inches H2O) across the filter. Since delta p is fixed by the vacuum of the engine, the variable to be adjusted is in surface area with filtration size at a constant. These filters were not rated as to the amount of surface area they have, this would greatly effect the effeciency graph if all were tested with a given surface area. Also, a micron is pretty small 10 to the -6 meters .000006, the particles in test were 2.5 to 80 microns in size. They also do not tell you the size of the particles that get through, only the accumulative mass. The larger ones will get caught and the smaller ones will get through. These particles in this size range that actually stay in your engine will only dirty your oil.
Ask your accountant how you did last year and a good one will ask you how you do you want to do. It is all subjective.
 
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #6  
deputydog95's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,538
From: North Dakota
Rep Power: 504
deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !deputydog95 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by GREERJ1
You can have filtration and performance if you incresase the surface area of the filter. These tests tell you what the filter will do per filter. To increase performance you must decrease the delta p (pressure, inches H2O) across the filter. Since delta p is fixed by the vacuum of the engine, the variable to be adjusted is in surface area with filtration size at a constant. These filters were not rated as to the amount of surface area they have, this would greatly effect the effeciency graph if all were tested with a given surface area. Also, a micron is pretty small 10 to the -6 meters .000006, the particles in test were 2.5 to 80 microns in size. They also do not tell you the size of the particles that get through, only the accumulative mass. The larger ones will get caught and the smaller ones will get through. These particles in this size range that actually stay in your engine will only dirty your oil.
Ask your accountant how you did last year and a good one will ask you how you do you want to do. It is all subjective.
i don't think surface area is a variable with this test. i could be wrong, but i was under the assumption that they were all "drop in" air filters to replace the stock one for the same vehicle. i agree with your point though in general about increasing the surface area.
 
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 10:43 PM
  #7  
Kvic's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 18
From: Santa Cruz CA
Rep Power: 0
Kvic is infamous around these parts
On my dodge truck with the diesel, I had a K & N and when I went to change out the turbo, to a much larger one, I found dust and grit in the intake tube. I replaced the filte with an AFE and after a few thousand miles, have found no dust or grit. So it all depends on what you find acceptable. Most of the higher flow elements sacrifice filtration efficiency.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PV=nRT.
Panamera
35
Sep 9, 2022 06:06 PM
Apex Chase
Automobiles For Sale
6
Mar 28, 2016 02:00 PM
Feelgood MD
997
65
Mar 24, 2016 09:35 AM
proTUNING Freaks
997 Turbo / GT2
17
Sep 15, 2015 07:28 AM
EMC2
Cayenne 955/957
4
Sep 7, 2015 05:20 PM


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 AM.