997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Gt-r R35 Vs 997 Turbo At Tsukuba Battle!

Old Jan 14, 2008 | 06:46 PM
  #31  
eclou's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,028
From: Houston
Rep Power: 201
eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !
The bad line is due to the unavoidable understeer which occurs with the stock measly -0.4 degrees of front camber. Dial it to -1.2 like the stock 997GT3 and the difference is amazing.
 
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #32  
GotBoost?'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,617
From: Orange County Socal
Rep Power: 159
GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Dr J
The Nurburgring time, the Inside Line test and this ---> all point to a great accomplishment by Nissan considering the price point they are selling the car at.

I think this will be great for P-car fans because Porsche will be forced to increase the performance numbers of the 997 (maybe this will encourage them to give the Cayman some much needed hp too!)

Dr J -- who would love to see a Cayman Turbo and a 600 hp 997 TT (if Porsche can make a 500hp Cayenne Turbo --- then they should make these cars too).. and also thinks HeavyCHevy needs to take his fricken blinders off.
Porsche doesn't need to be pushed to do anything. The 911 is an evoluton for the last 50 years. Evolution is a slow process. Any car company can start with a clean sheet of paper and design a fast sports car (given the budget of course). That is not the Porsche way when it comes to the 911. I'm sure we'll see a 600hp 911 in the future. In due time my friend. Personally, I don't want to see a turbocharged Cayman. Either way, who cares if the GTR is faster. I still love my Pcars! If I could really buy a GTR for $70k, I would buy one. Strictly as a fun car.
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #33  
hesperus's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 877
From: Philippines
Rep Power: 61
hesperus is just really nicehesperus is just really nicehesperus is just really nicehesperus is just really nicehesperus is just really nice
Originally Posted by eclou
The bad line is due to the unavoidable understeer which occurs with the stock measly -0.4 degrees of front camber. Dial it to -1.2 like the stock 997GT3 and the difference is amazing.
perhaps that's true, but the cars should be tested AS IS from the showroom.

if Porsche opted to put conservative susp settings on the car and NOT make R-compounds standard, then that's what you get out of the dealer. Assuming the GT-R in this test is standard (I don't know enough to tell either way; though race buckets in and of themselves don't strike me as a significant performance mod) then it would have been a fair fight, if not for the fact the Turbo's tires are shot.

The GT3 runs 1:03 at Tsukuba, last I remember. That's on R-comps. The car comes with those boots standard, so the test should reflect that. I haven't seen a 997 Turbo break 1:04 at this track. Both those times are very quick-- certainly faster than any JDM has achieved in the past, even the NSX Type-R which everyone seems to think gets an unfair advantage from Best Motoring.

The GT-R ran a 1:01 I think. Its the first stock production car to go that fast around this track, and assuming once again that this GTR was indeed showroom stock, then its impressive.

There are too few objective and independent tests at this point to say for sure which is faster. Nissan claims 7:38 with a pretty flash video that the "fanboys" are crowing about (what's with that term though? sorry but aren't there are P-car, F-car, L-car fanboys, as much as there are NiHondaBishiYata fanboys?). Horst Von Saurma said no way, wringing something like 7:50 out of the car. This Best Motoring vid seems to show the advantage swinging the GTR's way again.

I say bring on all the tests, as right now, these few comparisons are simply datapoints, and the true picture is only starting to emerge. I can't wait until more people get their mitts on the car and do more head to heads. I wouldn't be surprised if the GTR shows it is clearly superior in certain conditions and tracks, while the Porsche is equally better in other situations.

My $0.02, and perhaps worth even less than that

Cheers and peace boys!
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:08 AM
  #34  
Dino V's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,906
From: Chicago
Rep Power: 141
Dino V is just really niceDino V is just really niceDino V is just really niceDino V is just really niceDino V is just really nice
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
Porsche doesn't need to be pushed to do anything. The 911 is an evoluton for the last 50 years. Evolution is a slow process. Any car company can start with a clean sheet of paper and design a fast sports car (given the budget of course). That is not the Porsche way when it comes to the 911. I'm sure we'll see a 600hp 911 in the future. In due time my friend. Personally, I don't want to see a turbocharged Cayman. Either way, who cares if the GTR is faster. I still love my Pcars! If I could really buy a GTR for $70k, I would buy one. Strictly as a fun car.
Agreed
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #35  
SimonH's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 11
From: lancashire, UK
Rep Power: 0
SimonH is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by eclou
The bad line is due to the unavoidable understeer which occurs with the stock measly -0.4 degrees of front camber. Dial it to -1.2 like the stock 997GT3 and the difference is amazing.
Hi Eclou,
How does the TT feel with the GT3 alignment settings?.Does it feel more surefooted on turn in?.I often complain about the 911 having a very floaty feel to it, going through fast sweepers, as though the chassis is moving/bending on the suspension bushes.Would the GT3 settings have any effect on these observations?, regards, SIMON.
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #36  
eclou's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,028
From: Houston
Rep Power: 201
eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !
Simon, the adjustment of the front camber completely transforms the handling dynamics of the car. The 997tt is relatively heavy and this eliminates a lot of the initial "push" or understeer, thereby making the car far more neutral in handling. -1.2 is really very mild for a camber setting. I run almost -3.0 deg front camber on my track car.
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #37  
hatchback's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 24
hatchback is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by eclou
The bad line is due to the unavoidable understeer which occurs with the stock measly -0.4 degrees of front camber. Dial it to -1.2 like the stock 997GT3 and the difference is amazing.
If he had braked harder before the turn in he would be able to make the turn without pushing wide. Understeer always disappears at slower speeds Since the driver is a professional, I am guessing that the tires or brakes are getting worse on each lap which keeps pushing his ideal braking point further back.
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #38  
eclou's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,028
From: Houston
Rep Power: 201
eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !eclou Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by hatchback
If he had braked harder before the turn in he would be able to make the turn without pushing wide. Understeer always disappears at slower speeds Since the driver is a professional, I am guessing that the tires or brakes are getting worse on each lap which keeps pushing his ideal braking point further back.

True but then the other car just passes him earlier since the GTR has better entry speeds into each turn. He clearly was not taking an aggressive race line to block the GTR either.
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 04:25 PM
  #39  
Cedric's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,518
From: Montreal
Rep Power: 120
Cedric is infamous around these parts
Great race.
I dont think the power of the GTR can be denied

Germans got the history and glory, the Japanese got the newest technology.
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #40  
Paris_CarreraS's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
From: Buenos Aires
Rep Power: 80
Paris_CarreraS is a jewel in the roughParis_CarreraS is a jewel in the roughParis_CarreraS is a jewel in the rough
....those videos are very funny!!!!
no matter if the race is between an Enzo Vs. Honda Civic always japan cars wins!!!!!
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #41  
Paris_CarreraS's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
From: Buenos Aires
Rep Power: 80
Paris_CarreraS is a jewel in the roughParis_CarreraS is a jewel in the roughParis_CarreraS is a jewel in the rough
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by GotBoost?
Porsche doesn't need to be pushed to do anything. The 911 is an evoluton for the last 50 years. Evolution is a slow process. Any car company can start with a clean sheet of paper and design a fast sports car (given the budget of course). That is not the Porsche way when it comes to the 911. I'm sure we'll see a 600hp 911 in the future. In due time my friend. Personally, I don't want to see a turbocharged Cayman. Either way, who cares if the GTR is faster. I still love my Pcars! If I could really buy a GTR for $70k, I would buy one. Strictly as a fun car.

amen....
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #42  
GotBoost?'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,617
From: Orange County Socal
Rep Power: 159
GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Cedric
Great race.
I dont think the power of the GTR can be denied

Germans got the history and glory, the Japanese got the newest technology.
I don't think it's a matter of technology.
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:34 PM
  #43  
mr2guysingh's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,419
From: Washington
Rep Power: 83
mr2guysingh is a splendid one to beholdmr2guysingh is a splendid one to beholdmr2guysingh is a splendid one to beholdmr2guysingh is a splendid one to beholdmr2guysingh is a splendid one to beholdmr2guysingh is a splendid one to behold
Best Motoring sucks. Japanese cars always win
 
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:50 AM
  #44  
hatchback's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 24
hatchback is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by eclou
True but then the other car just passes him earlier since the GTR has better entry speeds into each turn. He clearly was not taking an aggressive race line to block the GTR either.
I was thinking of the laps after the GTR passed. The turbo driver's line keeps getting worse and worse and everytime he blows a corner he gets even further behind that he should be.
 
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 01:43 AM
  #45  
helothere's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 730
From: Socal 714/951
Rep Power: 50
helothere has a spectacular aura abouthelothere has a spectacular aura about
btw that video is not from Best Motoring.....

March issue of Best Motoring is going to feature race on
GTR vs 997GT3 vs 997TT vs NSX-R vs Gallardo SL...

and different GTR than the one they used here (Mine's shop car)

i wish BM gets someone's MT 997TT to use for their race, not the Tip....
 

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.