997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

WARNING: Dymag Wheels quality

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 03:03 PM
  #46  
Tech1_Mike's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 642
From: Kansas
Rep Power: 79
Tech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond repute
I don't know the weight of the stock Porsche wheels. But if we assume that there is a plausible weight reduction of 50-60 Lbs from the combined four wheels, i think a 0-60 mph improvement of one to two tenths of a second is entirely possible. This is due to the combined effects of mass (weight) and rotational inertia.
Of course, any really lightweight forged alloy wheel would have a similar effect on performance if the weights and moment of inertia were the same (or similar) as the carbon fiber wheels.
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #47  
steelerman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 133
From: Kendall, FL
Rep Power: 23
steelerman is infamous around these parts
True magnesium cast one piece wheels can leak too..... the metal has very high porosity. One of the reasons it is very light. Cars sitting on these wheels for awhile will slowly leak down. Sometimes not so slowly.......... They are not as trouble free as you would hope for, even for the expense.

In general the average person is better off with aluminum alloy wheels as stated many times on this forum. That being said on the track you need the lightest wheel possible and you spend what it takes and put up with the inconveniences as long as they don't compromise safety.
 

Last edited by steelerman; Jul 16, 2008 at 03:20 PM.
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #48  
imcarnuts's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,945
From: Pittsburgh Area
Rep Power: 171
imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by steelerman
True magnesium cast one piece wheels can leak too..... the metal has very high porosity. One of the reasons it is very light. Cars sitting on these wheels for awhile will slowly leak down. Sometimes not so slowly.......... They are not as trouble free as you would hope for, even for the expense.

In general the average person is better off with aluminum alloy wheels as stated many times on this forum.
I'm very average and love my Dymags. No issues whatsoever - maybe just lucky.


My 500th post
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #49  
Tech1_Mike's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 642
From: Kansas
Rep Power: 79
Tech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by steelerman
True magnesium cast one piece wheels can leak too..... the metal has very high porosity. One of the reasons it is very light. Cars sitting on these wheels for awhile will slowly leak down. Sometimes not so slowly.......... They are not as trouble free as you would hope for, even for the expense.

In general the average person is better off with aluminum alloy wheels as stated many times on this forum.
Cast magnesium is seldom used in wheels today. More common is forged magnesium which does not suffer from the porosity problems you describe.
However, Magnesium has other properties that make it less desirable than forged aluminum, cost among them.
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #50  
imcarnuts's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,945
From: Pittsburgh Area
Rep Power: 171
imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Forgedwheeler
I don't know the weight of the stock Porsche wheels. But if we assume that there is a plausible weight reduction of 50-60 Lbs from the combined four wheels, i think a 0-60 mph improvement of one to two tenths of a second is entirely possible. This is due to the combined effects of mass (weight) and rotational inertia.
Of course, any really lightweight forged alloy wheel would have a similar effect on performance if the weights and moment of inertia were the same (or similar) as the carbon fiber wheels.
How much more HP would be needed to decrease the 0-60 by 2/10 of a second?
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #51  
Tech1_Mike's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 642
From: Kansas
Rep Power: 79
Tech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by imcarnuts
How much more HP would be needed to decrease the 0-60 by 2/10 of a second?
It would take 25 to 30 as an estimate. But there are many factors that effect this such as gear ratio, vehicle weight, coefficient of drag, tire grip, etc.
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #52  
luiscarlos's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,291
From: N.A.
Rep Power: 81
luiscarlos has much to be proud ofluiscarlos has much to be proud ofluiscarlos has much to be proud ofluiscarlos has much to be proud ofluiscarlos has much to be proud ofluiscarlos has much to be proud ofluiscarlos has much to be proud ofluiscarlos has much to be proud of
I have Dymags and acceleration is the same as with OEM wheels I made several tests at the track with another identical car different color only jiji
BUT when you want to brake to reduce speed you can REALLY feel the difference,bracking is 100% better with lightweight wheels.
Handling hmmm maybe the same as OEM.
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #53  
Tech1_Mike's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 642
From: Kansas
Rep Power: 79
Tech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by luiscarlos
I have Dymags and acceleration is the same as with OEM wheels I made several tests at the track with another identical car different color only jiji
BUT when you want to brake to reduce speed you can REALLY feel the difference,bracking is 100% better with lightweight wheels.
Handling hmmm maybe the same as OEM.
As I said before, there are lots of variables. On a car like the 997TT that is traction limited, you won't see any 0-60 benefit because the car already accelerates as quick as the tires will permit, due to software/hardware intervention. Increasing grip improves acceleration in its own right, providing there is enough power.
In the end, there are simple laws of physics at work here. Reduce the mass and the rotational inertia and the car MUST accelerate quicker, unless there are other systems at work to prevent it.
 
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 05:19 AM
  #54  
FLATOUTZ06's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 28
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 0
FLATOUTZ06 is infamous around these parts
Interesting
 
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 05:31 AM
  #55  
brnsrgn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 943
From: WV
Rep Power: 75
brnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant futurebrnsrgn has a brilliant future
In some ways it looks like traction really had become the rate limiting step. Think about how 0-60 times have struggled. Massive increase in HP and 4 wheel drive have resulted in mid 3 sec times. RWD maybe mid 4's. Formula 1 cars with greatly exaggerated power to weight, and very sticky tires are in the mid 2's. My guess is 0-60 times and 1/4 times are going to plateau given the need for street tires to 1) last, and 2) work in the wet.

Major performance gains however can occur in braking and handling with weight loss.
 
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 06:29 AM
  #56  
Tech1_Mike's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 642
From: Kansas
Rep Power: 79
Tech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond reputeTech1_Mike has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by brnsrgn
In some ways it looks like traction really had become the rate limiting step. Think about how 0-60 times have struggled. Massive increase in HP and 4 wheel drive have resulted in mid 3 sec times. RWD maybe mid 4's. Formula 1 cars with greatly exaggerated power to weight, and very sticky tires are in the mid 2's. My guess is 0-60 times and 1/4 times are going to plateau given the need for street tires to 1) last, and 2) work in the wet.

Major performance gains however can occur in braking and handling with weight loss.
In addition, the cars are more responsive and accelerate harder in the 50-100 mph range where the cars are not traction limited. This is a sweet spot for driving for most guys anyway.
 
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #57  
amg e55's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 124
From: Portland, OR
Rep Power: 24
amg e55 is infamous around these parts
Should be no blemishes outta the box for the $.

If there are other issues along the way, hopefully they're dealt with quickly and efficiently. <thumbup>
 
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #58  
robertp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,272
From: California
Rep Power: 161
robertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Forgedwheeler
I don't know the weight of the stock Porsche wheels. But if we assume that there is a plausible weight reduction of 50-60 Lbs from the combined four wheels, i think a 0-60 mph improvement of one to two tenths of a second is entirely possible. This is due to the combined effects of mass (weight) and rotational inertia.
Of course, any really lightweight forged alloy wheel would have a similar effect on performance if the weights and moment of inertia were the same (or similar) as the carbon fiber wheels.
I think the Dymags weigh 19lbs front to 20.5lbs rear. The stock wheels weigh 24lbs front and 26lbs rear (without tires). At best, you get a 23lb weight reduction and that is a huge benifit.
 
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #59  
nick_usa's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 116
From: West London, UK
Rep Power: 37
nick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud ofnick_usa has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by robertp
I think the Dymags weigh 19lbs front to 20.5lbs rear. The stock wheels weigh 24lbs front and 26lbs rear (without tires). At best, you get a 23lb weight reduction and that is a huge benefit.
20.5lbs is correct for the Dymag rears, however the fronts come in at 16.8lbs

A 25.4lbs reduction.
 
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #60  
imcarnuts's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,945
From: Pittsburgh Area
Rep Power: 171
imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !imcarnuts Is a GOD !
Rears 20.5



Front 16.8



Both with valve stems but no TPMS
 

Last edited by imcarnuts; Jul 20, 2009 at 10:48 AM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.