997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

lowering springs

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 08:10 AM
  #16  
meaker's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 541
From: Charlotte,NC
Rep Power: 50
meaker is a splendid one to beholdmeaker is a splendid one to beholdmeaker is a splendid one to beholdmeaker is a splendid one to beholdmeaker is a splendid one to beholdmeaker is a splendid one to beholdmeaker is a splendid one to beholdmeaker is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by 997ttguru
Oh ok, sorry then
No biggie.
 
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 03:30 AM
  #17  
Tiago's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 566
From: Europe
Rep Power: 50
Tiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by TT Surgeon
GMGs are a larger diameter and apparently slightly stiffer and fit better, contact Fab at GMG for the specifics or ck out their website.
c
I doub that H&R sways has fitments issues for the 997TT. They already sponsored porsche cup's and have a huge R&D in the racing world. So i gave a shot for them. Another factor is that since i'm from europe, i can deal better with H&R than GMG.

What is the most usual setting: stiffer on the rear and soft on the front?
 

Last edited by Tiago; Apr 15, 2009 at 03:35 AM.
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 04:34 AM
  #18  
Alex_997TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 463
From: London, UK
Rep Power: 66
Alex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond reputeAlex_997TT has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Tiago
I doub that H&R sways has fitments issues for the 997TT. They already sponsored porsche cup's and have a huge R&D in the racing world. So i gave a shot for them. Another factor is that since i'm from europe, i can deal better with H&R than GMG.

What is the most usual setting: stiffer on the rear and soft on the front?
GMG sways can use the stock drop-links, and have 3 stiffness settings to choose from. GMG recommend soft on the front and stiff on the rear sways to reduce understeer. I myself find this a little too tail happy so have soft fronts and middle stiffness on the rear.

BTW - I am also in Europe and had no issues dealing with GMG.
 
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #19  
TT Gasman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,989
From: Texas
Rep Power: 117
TT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant future
I use middle for street and full stiff at the track on my rear gt2 bar, the stock front is plenty soft.
 
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 07:30 AM
  #20  
nyamg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,202
From: Long Island New York
Rep Power: 80
nyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by TT Surgeon
Highly recommend GMG spings and sways, alot of the other springs tend to sag alot after a few months. Mine have barely settled more than an 1/8" since install a yr ago.
Valentino, if you want to take a ride in mine before you decide, let me know.
c
C, I'll be in touch, thank you.
 
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 08:02 AM
  #21  
TT Surgeon's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,518
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
Rep Power: 351
TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !TT Surgeon Is a GOD !
I go to a lot of different track so I like the med fr/r. At a long track like the glen, soft fr/stiff rear works best.
 
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 10:34 AM
  #22  
Tiago's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 566
From: Europe
Rep Power: 50
Tiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to beholdTiago is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by Alex_997TT
BTW - I am also in Europe and had no issues dealing with GMG.
I will receive the sways in 3 days and will pay €450 with installation included. I doub that GMG would put at my door as fast for the same price, after VAT and duty taxes... Correct me if i'm wrong, but i believe that HR use also the stock drop-links and have 3 stiffness settings.

Thank you all for the sways setting feedback.
 
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #23  
supergoji's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 71
From: Westchester NY
Rep Power: 20
supergoji is infamous around these parts
wouldn't it be correct to assume that the stock shocks aren't designed to work with the lowering springs?
 
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #24  
TT Gasman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,989
From: Texas
Rep Power: 117
TT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant future
You would be very surprised, the stock PASM dampers do quite well with springs.
 
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 08:53 AM
  #25  
cannga's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,116
From: Palos Verdes
Rep Power: 256
cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by supergoji
wouldn't it be correct to assume that the stock shocks aren't designed to work with the lowering springs?
Yes it is. When you change just the spring, what you are asking the stock damper to do:

1. Piston shaft position that is outside of its intended range. At normal driving this might be ok. In the heat of battle, at high speed cornering with more compression, there is no reason to expect this to be a good thing.

2. Dampening rate that is not designed for the spring.

Bilstein who makes the stock unit, and any competent tuner will tell you that this is a compromise.
 
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 10:35 AM
  #26  
gmoney's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,315
From: WA state
Rep Power: 197
gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !gmoney Is a GOD !
Did Porsche use different shocks back in the day when they offered two springs, one for european consumption and then the 'Mustang GT' ride height sized ones for the US models?
 
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:47 AM
  #27  
GotBoost?'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,617
From: Orange County Socal
Rep Power: 159
GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !GotBoost? Is a GOD !
If you plan on tracking the car, a good set of coilovers would be a good call. If it's just for daily use, lower springs and sways would probably do the trick for you.
 
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #28  
TT Gasman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,989
From: Texas
Rep Power: 117
TT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant future
When you lower the car on the coil over are you not also decreasing the travel of the damper? Any damper has a fixed travel, seems to me this is the same effect as a lowering spring on a stock damper.
 

Last edited by TT Gasman; Apr 16, 2009 at 08:29 PM.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 10:03 PM
  #29  
cannga's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,116
From: Palos Verdes
Rep Power: 256
cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by gmoney
Did Porsche use different shocks back in the day when they offered two springs, one for european consumption and then the 'Mustang GT' ride height sized ones for the US models?
Very good question -- and the answer is yes. The shock absorbers ARE different from USA versus ROW. More specifically, the dampening force, both bound and rebound, are all different.
There is an article in Panorama http://www.pca.org/panorama/sample_article_3.html that actually measures this. (Written by, of all people, a radiologist and an anesthesiologist.) The site is down for now, so please don't hold me to this, but I think the curve below is from that article. The point is of course, the relationship is very finely tuned and you just can't change a spring and expect the shock absorber to operate in perfect condition if the change is not within its specified range.

If you call Bilstein, they will be quite adamant about the 2 points that I mentioned (shock height and damping force fine-tuned to a spring rate, or a reasonable range of spring rates). Without doubt, the result of lowering spring is good, as some of the veterans like Doug/Got Boost/eclou, etc., have reported. But somewhere in that setup, there is a compromise.

Doug,

Bilstein has a range of travel that is specified (where the 5mm to 35mm range comes from, this is very specifically noted in the instruction manual, or at least my interpretation of it ). I don't know what the spec for stock is but it's NOT 1 inch/25mm. I believe this is where the fear of premature valve failure comes from. The 2 points I brought up are old news and probably could be found in numerous old posts.

 

Last edited by cannga; Apr 16, 2009 at 10:18 PM.
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #30  
cgng30's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 407
From: Arizona
Rep Power: 44
cgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to behold
I finally installed techart springs, and I noticed that the softer part of the springs , the one with the teflon tubing are completly compressed (touching) when the car is static (not moving) is this normal? havent gone for a test drive yet.
 

Last edited by cgng30; Apr 19, 2009 at 07:59 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:46 PM.