100-200 km/h times: Stock_vs_Modified
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ison-data.html
I guess I didn't update my latest run which was a 6.3s 100-200km/hr. In a nutshell, I found that the times with 3-4 shift were very close to 4th gear only. I didn't powershift at all, and would consider these results easily replicated.
I've done it both ways, here's a link to the data "spreadsheet" comparing stock car with tune and with tune plus vtg upgrades.
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ison-data.html
I guess I didn't update my latest run which was a 6.3s 100-200km/hr. In a nutshell, I found that the times with 3-4 shift were very close to 4th gear only. I didn't powershift at all, and would consider these results easily replicated.
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ison-data.html
I guess I didn't update my latest run which was a 6.3s 100-200km/hr. In a nutshell, I found that the times with 3-4 shift were very close to 4th gear only. I didn't powershift at all, and would consider these results easily replicated.
masallah dostum, allah daha iyilerini nasip etsin.
I also did 100-150 in 6sec flat but the slope was 3,02%, so it cannot be verified. I'll try again soon
Sorry for the noob question, but why do you guys like this metric so much?
This is a long thread and I've seen people ask about this performance just about anytime someone posts a build / hp thread.
I've been a car enthusiast for a long time and this is the only place that I've seen so much focus on something besides 0-60 or 1/4 miles.
But its also the first time I've followed a forum focused on cars that can do 193 mph stock so, I'm sure I am just missing something ^_^;
This is a long thread and I've seen people ask about this performance just about anytime someone posts a build / hp thread.
I've been a car enthusiast for a long time and this is the only place that I've seen so much focus on something besides 0-60 or 1/4 miles.
But its also the first time I've followed a forum focused on cars that can do 193 mph stock so, I'm sure I am just missing something ^_^;
Sorry for the noob question, but why do you guys like this metric so much?
This is a long thread and I've seen people ask about this performance just about anytime someone posts a build / hp thread.
I've been a car enthusiast for a long time and this is the only place that I've seen so much focus on something besides 0-60 or 1/4 miles.
But its also the first time I've followed a forum focused on cars that can do 193 mph stock so, I'm sure I am just missing something ^_^;
This is a long thread and I've seen people ask about this performance just about anytime someone posts a build / hp thread.
I've been a car enthusiast for a long time and this is the only place that I've seen so much focus on something besides 0-60 or 1/4 miles.
But its also the first time I've followed a forum focused on cars that can do 193 mph stock so, I'm sure I am just missing something ^_^;
Plus you break stuff if you do too much hard launches. 100-200kmh and 60-130mph measure how fast your car is, it takes out the driver error out of equation assuming you don't miss a shift.
Cause 0-60 and the 1/4 requires good launches, and these cars with 6spd are a ***** to launch.
Plus you break stuff if you do too much hard launches.
100-200kmh and 60-130mph measure how fast your car is, it takes out the driver error out of equation assuming you don't miss a shift.
Plus you break stuff if you do too much hard launches. 100-200kmh and 60-130mph measure how fast your car is, it takes out the driver error out of equation assuming you don't miss a shift.
Yep never had any traction issues obviously with the 996/997tt cars all these years but this car obviously needs extra special care in order to put the power down... ( ofcourse I am still not able to launch it on public roads
)




