997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

porsche engine diagram at full power

Old Jun 23, 2010 | 08:12 AM
  #1  
cgng30's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 407
From: Arizona
Rep Power: 44
cgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to behold
porsche engine diagram at full power

I am sure this has been discussed before, but i was looking at the owners manual for something else and i saw this engine power curve and it shows max power/torque is achieved at roughly 2000, and it stays flat till about 4200. so how is that possible when i have never seen full boost at 2000 rpm. I never saw it before and i am not seeing it now even with the new exhaust. (with the exhaust the boost comes little early though, but no max at 20000) Is there some thing wrong with my car or is the power curve misleading
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 11:25 AM
  #2  
petey01's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 47
From: mississippi
Rep Power: 17
petey01 is infamous around these parts
I have noticed this before.Absolutely,boost starts later than Porsche's power curve shows!In this regard,my 996 turbo was superior.I was surprised at this when I bought my 997,expecting it to boost earlier.In my opinion Porsche's curve is incorrect and misleading.Maybe it was done with a low backpressure exhaust on a dyno,and not with the "as installed exhaust".And then maybe they adjusted the curve lower,to compensate,but didn't take into account the different low rpm boost characteristics....We hear debates about certain tuner's power curves perhaps being incorrect and overstated,but one would hope Porsche's own curves would be right....
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 11:34 AM
  #3  
petey01's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 47
From: mississippi
Rep Power: 17
petey01 is infamous around these parts
Perhaps I should add that a dyno exhaust system might have almost zero back pressure and might not have the usual cats or even any cats.Your sports system might have 2.5 psi to 3.5 psi (standard is over 6psi) depending on which system it is.Which system is it,by the way?
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #4  
cgng30's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 407
From: Arizona
Rep Power: 44
cgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by petey01
Perhaps I should add that a dyno exhaust system might have almost zero back pressure and might not have the usual cats or even any cats.Your sports system might have 2.5 psi to 3.5 psi (standard is over 6psi) depending on which system it is.Which system is it,by the way?
ok so its not me then i have EP stage 1, it has 2.65 psi bp
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 05:17 PM
  #5  
petey01's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 47
From: mississippi
Rep Power: 17
petey01 is infamous around these parts
That's about as low a back pressure one can get with a cat system.I was thinking about getting that system myself,by the way.What do you think of it-power,noise,throttle response,increased boost at low rpms?I don't want a noisy system.My car has been re mapped-it does help with power above 2500 rpm,but hasn't really changed boost characteristics at say,2000rpm.I don't think there is much more one can do about that...
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 09:50 PM
  #6  
cgng30's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 407
From: Arizona
Rep Power: 44
cgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by petey01
That's about as low a back pressure one can get with a cat system.I was thinking about getting that system myself,by the way.What do you think of it-power,noise,throttle response,increased boost at low rpms?I don't want a noisy system.My car has been re mapped-it does help with power above 2500 rpm,but hasn't really changed boost characteristics at say,2000rpm.I don't think there is much more one can do about that...
actually Ep makes a stage 2, it has 1.75 psi bp but it is loud , it has cats. as far as the stage 1 which is what i have. the fit and finish is perfect, the sound is just right, nice and deep, no droning throttle response is more responsive, getting the boost earlier now, did not feel the power as much from but dyno, may be ecu is learning, i dont have software though. i would recommend it. oh and it has 100 cel cats
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 10:04 PM
  #7  
bbywu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,774
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1007
bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by petey01
I have noticed this before.Absolutely,boost starts later than Porsche's power curve shows!In this regard,my 996 turbo was superior.I was surprised at this when I bought my 997,expecting it to boost earlier.
Porsche's VTGs have less lag and produce boost faster than any other previous production 911 turbo. What you are describing is not lag...you are experiencing lack of boost threshold. Under 2000 RPM, you are running under boost threshold. It will not produce power. This is a property of the turbo itself, dependent on the size of the turbo and the compressor wheel used. If you are at 4000 RPM and hit WOT, datalog your boost curve on your 996TT. I guarantee you the lag will be significantly greater than on the 997TT stock OEM VTG turbos.
Originally Posted by petey01
In my opinion Porsche's curve is incorrect and misleading.Maybe it was done with a low backpressure exhaust on a dyno,and not with the "as installed exhaust".And then maybe they adjusted the curve lower,to compensate,but didn't take into account the different low rpm boost characteristics....
Their curve is a marketing graphic. It is not intended to be accurate. You will never find a dyno curve that looks like the one they display. It is for marketing purposes. Furthermore, Porsche does not use chassis dynos. They use Maha engine dynos. Every Mezger engine is dynoed before installation to ensure production of at least 105% of quoted HP and torque.
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 10:57 PM
  #8  
petey01's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 47
From: mississippi
Rep Power: 17
petey01 is infamous around these parts
Yes,you're right-throttle response at 4000rpm is quick-very little lag.But didn't Porsche claim a wider powerband and for torque to be delivered at lower rpm,with the 997,compared with the 996?
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 11:12 PM
  #9  
bbywu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,774
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1007
bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !
Porsche's brochure says

"...Porsche used a variable-geometry turbocharger for the first time with this engine. This technology permits extremely fast boost pressure build up with good response characteristics, high torque values, even at low engine speeds and over a wide RPM range, as well as high maximum power combined with low fuel consumption..."

In a comparison to the 996TT, "...fuller torque curve, particularly in the low RPM range."

I do not believe you will see these changes on a chassis dyno...especially at very low RPM.
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 11:16 PM
  #10  
ruf_turbo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,181
From: FL West Coast
Rep Power: 117
ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by petey01
Yes,you're right-throttle response at 4000rpm is quick-very little lag.But didn't Porsche claim a wider powerband and for torque to be delivered at lower rpm,with the 997,compared with the 996?
Porsche didn't say that you could actually notice the 'improvement'.
 
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 09:04 AM
  #11  
cgng30's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 407
From: Arizona
Rep Power: 44
cgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to beholdcgng30 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by bbywu
Porsche's VTGs have less lag and produce boost faster than any other previous production 911 turbo. What you are describing is not lag...you are experiencing lack of boost threshold. Under 2000 RPM, you are running under boost threshold. It will not produce power. This is a property of the turbo itself, dependent on the size of the turbo and the compressor wheel used. If you are at 4000 RPM and hit WOT, datalog your boost curve on your 996TT. I guarantee you the lag will be significantly greater than on the 997TT stock OEM VTG turbos.

Their curve is a marketing graphic. It is not intended to be accurate. You will never find a dyno curve that looks like the one they display. It is for marketing purposes. Furthermore, Porsche does not use chassis dynos. They use Maha engine dynos. Every Mezger engine is dynoed before installation to ensure production of at least 105% of quoted HP and torque.
Bob

totally understand your comment. makes sense , but isn's that false marketing.
 
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #12  
bbywu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,774
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1007
bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by cgng30
Bob

totally understand your comment. makes sense , but isn's that false marketing.
It would be...if they ever claimed that that pictogram was a true dyno.
 
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 09:36 AM
  #13  
bartg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
bartg is infamous around these parts
marketing vs engineering

claimed horsepower has been an issue for every car owner ever since there was a combustion engine.
I have a 996tt and recently had it dyno'd and was suprised to learn that even all dynos are not made the same.
But i learned alot about how my turbochargers work by looking at the power curves.
 
Attached Images  
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 11:10 AM
  #14  
JETmn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 71
From: Minneapolis
Rep Power: 17
JETmn is infamous around these partsJETmn is infamous around these parts
That is weird that they have the TQ and HP on different scales, it really throws off the look of the chart compared to normal dyno charts. Your HP looks artificially high in the graph because of how they scaled it.
 
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 11:23 AM
  #15  
bartg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
bartg is infamous around these parts
agreed

I agree. The scale is weird.
but I was surprised how quickly the torque drops off.
I was also suprised to see the HP didnt drop off with the torque.
And this is a 996 not a 997 so it has k16's not k-24's
 

Last edited by bartg; Aug 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM.

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 AM.