Yes think so but I am trying to find a way to log the actual egts on the durametric vs the modelled ones..

 

That's what I thought too. I'd be suprised if EGT wasn't a direct measurement. Sometimes the translation from German to English seems a bit off with the Durametric.

 

+1 to Bob. Dude great thread

 

Another +rep to Bob and a renewed call for making this a sticky thread.

 

homerun thread!

 

Thanks Gene.

Updated AFR and timing section.

 

Also it will be very good if we can log or detect knock through the actual data?

I tried to know and search in the actual date but could not find !!!

Do anybody know we can do that

Thanks

 

Cool thread

 

Is there any way to log knock ?

 

I was told that Durametric only takes 4 samples per second. Some dataloggers such as UMW's take 76 samples per second or better depending on the laptop. That datalogger shows the knock sensors, along with all the other important variables.

 

It will do a lot more than that. For instance, in 1 sec, it can easily handle 4 PIDs with 20 entries. That's 80 samples/sec.

 

1+++++++++++++++++

 

If you are correct then I was misinformed.

 

Here's one with 126 samples/sec. It's dependent on your hard drive speed as well as the number of simultaneous values you are recording, at least that is what I was told in the past by Durametric.

 

Hi,
i bought durametric cable for 996-997 for two weeks ago.i have 08 997 turbo cabrio auto.When i select actual i can't see anything however when i use electrical i can erase fault codes.

i Choose Actual Values but durametric not display