997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Help with Durametric log file

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 07:58 PM
  #16  
nevert00fast's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 533
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 40
nevert00fast is infamous around these partsnevert00fast is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by MBailey
The map still is not what I am used to seeing with my pump tune, but timing is less shaky on this run 18 degrees and 1.4 bar is alot om 93 oct. I dont like how much the boost tapers at the top end from 1.4 down to 1.1 bar. This run looks very rich with lambas as low as 0.70 (afr ~ 10.3)...

I would consult your tuner and let him see the log and explain why the parameters are the way they are.
I will question about the lambda values. I've emailed APR about the boost levels prior to data logging, they were pretty on point saying max 1.4 bar and tapering off to 1.1 bar.
 
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #17  
nevert00fast's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 533
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 40
nevert00fast is infamous around these partsnevert00fast is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by earl3
agreed, both the boost drop and fat AFRs may be indicative of a leak. In fact, it gets richer as the boost tapers. Logging MAF and setpoint boost pressure in addition to what you already have may shed some light onto it.
A boost leak or something else?

I tried looking for the setpoint boost pressure but didn't see it. Is it an available field with the 6.2 software?
 

Last edited by nevert00fast; Apr 5, 2012 at 08:03 PM.
Old Apr 5, 2012 | 11:48 PM
  #18  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Using data from your first post. Looks pretty good to me.

 
Old Apr 6, 2012 | 07:11 AM
  #19  
nevert00fast's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 533
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 40
nevert00fast is infamous around these partsnevert00fast is infamous around these parts
Is that the boost? Looks like a normal taper.

Thanks everyone for their help so far!
 
Old Apr 6, 2012 | 10:15 PM
  #20  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by nevert00fast
Is that the boost? Looks like a normal taper.

Thanks everyone for their help so far!
No man, that's load vs rpm. Greater load = greater torque. You should put in some race gas and load up that 100 octane file. I'd be curious to see what your load curve looks like.
 
Old Apr 7, 2012 | 06:51 AM
  #21  
nevert00fast's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 533
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 40
nevert00fast is infamous around these partsnevert00fast is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by TTdude
No man, that's load vs rpm. Greater load = greater torque. You should put in some race gas and load up that 100 octane file. I'd be curious to see what your load curve looks like.
Gotcha. I'll be doing some logging with 100 octane soon, just have to finish the 93 in the tank now.
 
Old Oct 15, 2012 | 02:56 PM
  #22  
faiz's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 304
From: CANADA
Rep Power: 31
faiz is just really nicefaiz is just really nicefaiz is just really nicefaiz is just really nice
Did u end up doing the 100 oct log?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
COBB Tuning
GT3/GT2
3
Nov 3, 2015 08:39 AM
Frank ( Sunnyside )
Bentley
5
Oct 3, 2015 11:13 PM
vividracing
991 Turbo
23
Oct 2, 2015 02:23 PM
ek1
Bentley
0
Sep 27, 2015 08:38 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.