997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

704HP/691ft/lbs 997.1 Cabriolet

Old Oct 4, 2015 | 12:21 PM
  #16  
roncooper's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 47
roncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond repute
I never dynoed the car on pump, we did however make 13-15 revisions of that map. The best 60-130 I got on pump was 7.2 I believe. With this being said there is something left to be desired about my ability to get the most out of the car.

I would be surprised if the car ran a 6.3. I'm at about 750 above sea level here.

I'll for sure post a verified vbox run once I do it. I have a hard time believing some of these times people report without providing the logs or verified graphs.
 
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 12:23 PM
  #17  
roncooper's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 47
roncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Bobbyfali
Pls get some 60-130 times, you have a sub 6sec car there!!


Is the car actually running 12.5A/R's?


What power did she put down on pump and do you have a dyno chart of that as well?
I'm not sure what the AFR is exactly, I haven't reviewed the logs myself nor have I driven the car since they dyno pull. The weather has been crappy here in central Ohio.
 
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 02:36 PM
  #18  
Bobbyfali's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,601
From: Brampton,Ontario,Canada
Rep Power: 205
Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !Bobbyfali Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by roncooper
I never dynoed the car on pump, we did however make 13-15 revisions of that map. The best 60-130 I got on pump was 7.2 I believe. With this being said there is something left to be desired about my ability to get the most out of the car.

I would be surprised if the car ran a 6.3. I'm at about 750 above sea level here.

I'll for sure post a verified vbox run once I do it. I have a hard time believing some of these times people report without providing the logs or verified graphs.


A couple of runs I just did 4th gear, so it takes out the "ability" factor and more consistency for measuring delta's before and after mods.


I know about the 60-130 #'s, but I use it under the same conditions to measure and it is almost flat and almost going a tad up hill. I don't care for bench racing 60-130 based on what your saying above, as when your door to door on the streets is how you tell who is faster in the real world.


Just do a 4th on a even road (repeat all test there) roll up to 45-50, mash the throttle, hold on until 7200rpm, repeat three times (after a mile or so cool down), take your average and bang! So when you do your next mod you can do the same test and see your delta difference.


If you do the above on a flat surface you should be 6.1's or better for sure with that power band you have and wouldn't be surprised if sub 6's rolled up.


When you did your pump gas 60-130, what method did you use?
 
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 02:58 PM
  #19  
rix's Avatar
rix
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,077
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 174
rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by A418t81
Graph looks great man! These are the Xona compressor wheel'd ones right?
Yes, Xona uses the HTZ compressor wheels.
 
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 07:54 AM
  #20  
jjurroz's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 243
From: Miami, FL.
Rep Power: 41
jjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant future
I'd be interested in the logs if they're available.

-Jose

Originally Posted by roncooper
The car runs 22.5 max psi.

I'll post some logs of pulls if people are interested.

I'm not sure why that video didn't work I'll see if I can get the original from the person shooting it

Mod list:
65mm VTG
AMS headers
Inlet pipes
Tubi Race
AMS intercoolers
AMS Y pipe
82mm throttle body
IPD plenum
1000cc injectors
Cobb Accessport E85 map MAFless
Clutch and lwfw

I also converted the car to centerlock wheels with Porsche RS Spyder wheels. While I had the engine out I pinned the coolant lines and replaced the oil cooler elbows.

All the work was done by myself and a friend in my garage.
 
Old Oct 6, 2015 | 08:35 AM
  #21  
Mark @ AIM Performance's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,584
From: S.Plainfield, NJ
Rep Power: 856
Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !
some solid numbers !
 
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 08:35 AM
  #22  
roncooper's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 47
roncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond repute
Log

Here is the Log from the 704-691 dyno pull

Looks like my injector duty cycle was around 86% with the 1000cc injectors which I am very happy with.

I know I have/had a small boost leak on bank 1 at the intercooler. I need to re clamp the hose and I just haven't had the time to pull the intercooler to do so.
You can see the duty cycle on the turbo on that side is a little higher.

Looking at the 65mm VTG duty cycle you can see these guys are not nearly working as hard as they are capable. What would be interesting to see is how these 65mm HTZ wheels compare to the 68mm HTA wheels. I would surmise that the 65 mm are more efficient and would make as much power yet with less back pressure.
 
Attached Files
File Type: csv
704-691 dyno run.csv (131.3 KB, 86 views)
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 11:11 AM
  #23  
COBB Tuning's Avatar
Former Vendor
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 914
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 0
COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !COBB Tuning Is a GOD !
Looking good Ron!!

-Mitch
 
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 02:48 PM
  #24  
rix's Avatar
rix
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,077
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 174
rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by roncooper
Here is the Log from the 704-691 dyno pull

Looks like my injector duty cycle was around 86% with the 1000cc injectors which I am very happy with.

I know I have/had a small boost leak on bank 1 at the intercooler. I need to re clamp the hose and I just haven't had the time to pull the intercooler to do so.
You can see the duty cycle on the turbo on that side is a little higher.

Looking at the 65mm VTG duty cycle you can see these guys are not nearly working as hard as they are capable. What would be interesting to see is how these 65mm HTZ wheels compare to the 68mm HTA wheels. I would surmise that the 65 mm are more efficient and would make as much power yet with less back pressure.
The limit with either turbo is probably going to be in the turbine. You might get a little more with the 68mm over the 65mm though. The difference between 65 HTZ vs 68mmHTA would still favor the larger wheel based on the anecdotal evidence I've seen.
 
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 03:16 PM
  #25  
roncooper's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 47
roncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond reputeroncooper has a reputation beyond repute
Well Dan we almost figured that out. Anyone else have a 68mm dyno chart on e85?
 
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 04:03 PM
  #26  
SamboTT@ByDesign's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,901
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 0
SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !
You burning up some rubber out there?
 

Last edited by SamboTT@ByDesign; Oct 9, 2015 at 08:23 PM.
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 04:11 PM
  #27  
rix's Avatar
rix
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,077
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 174
rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by roncooper
Well Dan we almost figured that out. Anyone else have a 68mm dyno chart on e85?
I was about to get one but ran into some difficulties.
 
Old Oct 10, 2015 | 06:50 AM
  #28  
The Bogg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,658
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 236
The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !
what is the rated flow capability of the 65htz? it's 47lb/min for the 68hta in the Champion turbo.
 
Old Oct 10, 2015 | 08:38 AM
  #29  
IMI A's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 503
From: UK
Rep Power: 138
IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !
Thumbs up

Guys the only way you are really going to know which turbo performs better i.e. 65mm or 68mm is to run both side by side on same day all the way up to VMAX. Until you do that this dyno info is v.interesting but not properly field tested

Intrigued to see the results myself.
 
Old Oct 10, 2015 | 10:28 AM
  #30  
SamboTT@ByDesign's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,901
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 0
SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !
The 65HTZ flows at 44 lb/min and responds better being smaller. HTA are still better than most. Plenty of air I have found and a nice match. Lots of cars running strong with this set-up and room to go.
 

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:20 PM.