No need for bigger turbos..Garth and Fabworx deliver
#17
How do you like the setup so far? Have you tried some race gas on it yet? I am in the middle of installing things and looking at the injectors, looks like a PITA! Thinking of doing the injectors this fall/winter when I bring the engine down to pin the coolant fittings. That would leave me with a setup close to yours, but with no cats. I won't be able to throw E85 on it till I do the injectors.
#18
How do you like the setup so far? Have you tried some race gas on it yet? I am in the middle of installing things and looking at the injectors, looks like a PITA! Thinking of doing the injectors this fall/winter when I bring the engine down to pin the coolant fittings. That would leave me with a setup close to yours, but with no cats. I won't be able to throw E85 on it till I do the injectors.
Car is a blast to drive very addicting in keeping my foot off the throttle...can't wait for the next 1/2 mile event....
#23
Thanks I appreciate it.
I'm a turbocharger development engineer, small world lol. Transient response would not be that turbos strong suit. That's a big ABB turbo also axial turbine stage. Everything I work on is radial stages (like what these cars use), nothing that big, but still big compared to cars lol.
#24
Same here, would be great to know how the stock fuel system is doing with these mods. Appreciate all the feedback!
#26
Obviously I am making assumptions for drivetrain loss, that particular dyno reading, stock injector sizing, etc but that puts you around .50 BSFC maybe slightly better. That's pretty darn good. Goes to show you cut down pumping loss quite a bit. I think you did an excellent job showing what a full bolt on can do without a doubt.
#27
Thanks it's a great set up because it's so responsive that it just pulls you out of tight turns.. Great for tracking your car and the car has wicked pull till 150..bigger turbos are for a later time with more longer straights..huge potential
#28
Obviously I am making assumptions for drivetrain loss, that particular dyno reading, stock injector sizing, etc but that puts you around .50 BSFC maybe slightly better. That's pretty darn good. Goes to show you cut down pumping loss quite a bit. I think you did an excellent job showing what a full bolt on can do without a doubt.
#29
BSFC is brake specific fuel consumption, I put it in English units because I figured most would be familiar with those units (in a professional environment we would typically use metric). Pumping work influences BSFC, lowering pumping losses will improve it. For example if right now you swap to GT2 turbos and target the same exact power you would do it at a lower BSFC because of the higher flowing turbines. It would require less boost pressure etc. We can go on for hours on this subject but wanted to give you a flavor. Lots of great books and articles online regarding this.
Here is some simple calculators you can play around with:
https://www.rceng.com/technical.aspx
Here is some simple calculators you can play around with:
https://www.rceng.com/technical.aspx
#30
Obviously I am making assumptions for drivetrain loss, that particular dyno reading, stock injector sizing, etc but that puts you around .50 BSFC maybe slightly better. That's pretty darn good. Goes to show you cut down pumping loss quite a bit. I think you did an excellent job showing what a full bolt on can do without a doubt.