Would an R8 pose a threat to the new turbo??
#32
It wont compete performance wise with the current engine, but if they bring the price in right, I'd take it over a C4S. Looks cools, great handling, exclusive. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a Porsche around here.
#34
Originally Posted by Bluehinder
It wont compete performance wise with the current engine, but if they bring the price in right, I'd take it over a C4S. Looks cools, great handling, exclusive. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a Porsche around here.
#36
Originally Posted by dakine
I think car and driver or one of those mags ran a 4.0 0-60 and a 12.6 quarter mile at 110mph. Something like that.
#37
Originally Posted by iLLM3
Yea you are right, that's even MUCH slower than a stock K16 996TT!!
#40
Originally Posted by Sniper112
V8, 420 hp, 300+ torque....weight(i dont know)
would it put up a fight with the mighty 911 turbo?
would it put up a fight with the mighty 911 turbo?
Don’t leave the torque and drive train out of the equation. I think 317ft/lb coupled with a 6 speed transmission is going to cause some relative performance problems. I’m no expert by any means but this combination should be no match for the turbo of the same weight.
<o> </o>
The only way we get away with the lower torque in the M5 is because of the 7speed sequential and 500 HP, still the M5 lacks that low end punch that could put it in another class. Then again the Audi is 600lb lighter, so maybe this makes up for it?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eclip5e
Automobiles For Sale
8
04-28-2022 12:38 AM