My encounter with the new R8
[quote=frafoss;1664986]The standard Carrera is in my opinon underrated. At a track in Germany I tested a roling start against 4S with power kit. Ok, he had a passanger, but I got the better of him (track was dry), then he came to my door but couldn't get away. When straight wash finished, its long, I was still in front.
I would be nice to say that the driver did the differece, but not in this case.[/quote
Thats one of the reasons why I bought the c2 ,Plus price.I figured I could do alot more with the money i saved to make the car better with mods.
I would be nice to say that the driver did the differece, but not in this case.[/quote
Thats one of the reasons why I bought the c2 ,Plus price.I figured I could do alot more with the money i saved to make the car better with mods.
Man I'd be a very unhappy camper if my 381 hp C4S could not pull on a standard C2, epsecially from a roll which would help out with the additional weight of the all wheel drive and passenger...
The standard Carrera is in my opinon underrated. At a track in Germany I tested a roling start against 4S with power kit. Ok, he had a passanger, but I got the better of him (track was dry), then he came to my door but couldn't get away. When straight wash finished, its long, I was still in front.
I would be nice to say that the driver did the differece, but not in this case.
I would be nice to say that the driver did the differece, but not in this case.
Yes, he wasn't very happy with the result. He asked me afterwards what mods I hade done and I told him honestly about the Preformance friction brake pads other wise all stock. His passenger told later that night the he had cursed continouis the whole session, about how the f... that Carrera was going. Sad for him, nice for me
If I were him I'd go get my car dynoed...it would also be interesting to see if your C2 is putting out more than the 325 hp it's supposed to...maybe you got one that produces power at the very high end of the specs
.
.
I think his car was in perfect shape. It stored and served all year by Manthey Racing, who are considered best in class. Maybe I got lucky, but I will never now because there are no dynos in the area I thrust. I don't actually care either.
I wasn't thinking the car was not maintained or running properly; but if I were him I'd be rather curious to see if the engine was putting out the power it should be (especially since he paid all that extra $$$ for X51).
Last edited by 500; Feb 7, 2008 at 07:43 PM.
You really need to pay more attention to power/wt rather than HP figures. The x51 is carrying 300 lbs or so for 4wd plus options and a passenger. If his passenger is 200 lbs, thats 56 horsepower to lug an extra 500 lbs. Simply not enough especially if you factor in drivetrain loss for the 4cs. The x51 is a nice engine but it simply is not that much faster than an S. The dude should've bought a turbo if he wanted to be quicker. The Euro mags speak very favorably for the standard C and no one who bought one should question that.
Good thoughts. I too mentioned the weight factor a few posts above but also considered that the cars took off from a rolling start thinking the extra weight then may not be as much of a hinderance @ speed allowing the extra hp to shine. I can't remember the formula but torque was the biggest factor in initial acceleration then horsepower comes into play as the speed increases or something to that effect. I have heard many good things about the X package but every once in a while someone gets an X51 car on the track vs. an S without it and the X driver comes away dissapointed that he coudn't shake the non X S.
Last edited by 500; Feb 7, 2008 at 11:13 PM.
i know car and driver has done a 3.9 60MPH and 12.1 1/4 in a 997S NON X51, regular 997's are NOT doing those numbers. sorry. S's are VERY under rated and people don't give them much credit, i think for the money with a good driver the 997S is one of the best cars currently made. i understand this is two completely different situations with two completely different cars but my buddy has a 430WHP EVO and has DUSTED F430's and 996 Turbos off the line, but from a roll he got absolutely smoked by a 997S with headers and exhaust. by 100mph the 997S was 3 cars in front of him.
i know car and driver has done a 3.9 60MPH and 12.1 1/4 in a 997S NON X51, regular 997's are NOT doing those numbers. sorry. S's are VERY under rated and people don't give them much credit, i think for the money with a good driver the 997S is one of the best cars currently made. i understand this is two completely different situations with two completely different cars but my buddy has a 430WHP EVO and has DUSTED F430's and 996 Turbos off the line, but from a roll he got absolutely smoked by a 997S with headers and exhaust. by 100mph the 997S was 3 cars in front of him.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






