997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

got smoked by a GTR this morn!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 09:25 AM
  #61  
GTSilver997's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 157
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 24
GTSilver997 is infamous around these parts
I don't know if this has been posted and/or discussed. For a bit of reference...modded GT-R vs. Bugatti

To be frank (real world objective performance aside), a regular 997 Carrera S is not THE answer for all subjective measures either. Whether you like the the way how the GT-R drives or looks, you have to admire how Nissan could pack so much performance in a $85K car.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8O5n...layer_embedded
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 09:32 AM
  #62  
tourbillon001's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 696
From: clearwater florida
Rep Power: 57
tourbillon001 has much to be proud oftourbillon001 has much to be proud oftourbillon001 has much to be proud oftourbillon001 has much to be proud oftourbillon001 has much to be proud oftourbillon001 has much to be proud oftourbillon001 has much to be proud oftourbillon001 has much to be proud oftourbillon001 has much to be proud of
No matter how much faster the GTR is

I just found it boring to drive, and I've driven one on both the track and the street.
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #63  
RyanJ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 118
From: ME
Rep Power: 21
RyanJ is infamous around these parts
As far as which car is 'better'...that question is only answered once the modifications are removed from the equation. The only real way to do this, is to look at GT race track results. This will play out for us over the next few years. The competition will only drive Porsche to build faster, better 911 line ups.

Originally Posted by Arerrac911
I respectfully disagree with this analogy, the GTR (or Skyline GTR) does have history, and quite an impressive one at that....(if you do some research)...
No doubt the Skyline & GT's have been around for awhile and have won a bunch of GT races a long time ago...but their history has major gaps. Its a shame the GTR line was discontinued so many times. Decades in between programs? The GTR/Skyline generations are hugely different due to the long periods of innactivity. There isn't much bridging the generations.

I just don't see the consistent evolution and refinement that you see with other cars (which haven't been discontinued for long periods) and retain the heritage and soul (Corvette, 911).
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #64  
jherbias's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 279
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 37
jherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to behold
The badge snobs are out in full force... this thread might as well be moved to the "Turbo" or "GT" sections.

As for boring to drive... that can be easily remedied w/ a standard transmission, although I doubt there are plans for that. I guess to give a car soul, you need to make it struggle to achieve a lap time.

My only gripe w/ the GTR is the exterior. But an article in Automobile Mag stated that the GTR was designed to be brutish-looking (as noted by some people here) instead of streamlined, like EVERY other car manufacturer. If the car looked better, I would have a much harder time choosing between a GTR and a 997.
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 10:44 AM
  #65  
jherbias's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 279
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 37
jherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by RyanJ
As far as which car is 'better'...that question is only answered once the modifications are removed from the equation. The only real way to do this, is to look at GT race track results. This will play out for us over the next few years. The competition will only drive Porsche to build faster, better 911 line ups.



No doubt the Skyline & GT's have been around for awhile and have won a bunch of GT races a long time ago...but their history has major gaps. Its a shame the GTR line was discontinued so many times. Decades in between programs? The GTR/Skyline generations are hugely different due to the long periods of innactivity. There isn't much bridging the generations.

I just don't see the consistent evolution and refinement that you see with other cars (which haven't been discontinued for long periods) and retain the heritage and soul (Corvette, 911).
The Skyline has been out since 1957. And the Renault-Nissan alliance didn't help either.
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #66  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by yrralis1
Even if one buys a 997.1tt used it will cost some extra time and expense to upgrade to run with the Gtr. it will still cost more.
That's the only part where we don't agree. I know for a fact that a 997.1TT is as fast or faster than a stock GT-R in a straight line. No mods required. They run almost the same 1/4 mile times, but the 997TT.1 is faster as the speed increases. It runs a quicker 60-130 time and 0-300 km/h, and reaches higher mph in the standing mile.

Again, (with a proper driver) a 997TT.1 is as fast or faster than a stock GT-R. No modifications required. This has already been proven.

Around a roadcourse however, the GT-R is the faster car, if that's what you are saying.
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #67  
silver329's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 229
From: New York
Rep Power: 29
silver329 is a jewel in the roughsilver329 is a jewel in the roughsilver329 is a jewel in the roughsilver329 is a jewel in the rough
Definitely a lot of badge snobs on this post. If this were boxing and we had to judge who the stronger fighter is "pound for pound" (in this case, i'm using price as the normalizing factor), the GTR would knock out the Porsche in the 1st rd. Period. I own my own C2S liike most of us here on this site and have no plans or desires to switch over to a GTR, but the guys saying a 997.2 TTS can smoke a stock GTR just don't get it. It costs TWICE as much! it SHOULD outperform. The equivalent p-car in the GTR price range is a 997S and on performance alone the GTR dominates. The other "qualatative" factors such as overall cabin feel, preference for the body shape, history, lineage...etc are serioulsy skewing most of the opinions on this thread (as one would almost expect on a porsche board).
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #68  
Cabinetman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 71
From: Fort Worth, TX
Rep Power: 20
Cabinetman is infamous around these partsCabinetman is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by jherbias
As for boring to drive... that can be easily remedied w/ a standard transmission, although I doubt there are plans for that. I guess to give a car soul, you need to make it struggle to achieve a lap time.
I think you have hit the nail on the head. I came to the GT-R from a E90 M3 with the DCT transmission and I found the GT-R more entertaining to drive than the M3. The GT-R has better steering and brake feel while giving up little in overall chassis tuning to the much praised BMW. However, both cars lack that extra layer of driver involvement that comes from rowing your own gears. My next car will have three pedals because I miss that aspect of driving.
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 11:13 AM
  #69  
zzzspeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,121
From: San Diego
Rep Power: 101
zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jherbias
Saying that the GT-R is just a Nissan (or Japanese), especially after a loss in a drag race or whatever, is a pretty pathetic and d-baggy reason to justify your purchase over one. This is more apparent when it is the Porsche driver instigating the race. I know this isn't everybody on this thread, but you might as well beat a Ferrari owner and have them say the same thing to you.

They are fast cars for relatively cheap. Is there anything wrong w/ that?

Please show me where I said it is just a Nissan. I never put the car down, just simply stated that I dont care for the looks of the inerior and exterior...which is my subjective opinion.
This was a fun experience for me whether I win or lose, and I would do it again because that is why I love performance cars.
I approach this forum for info and entertainment and I dont understand why some people need to come on here and try to insult each other with name calling and such.
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 12:19 PM
  #70  
RyanJ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 118
From: ME
Rep Power: 21
RyanJ is infamous around these parts
It is Porsche vs World, in here.

As a proud owner of the worst handling and slowest 997 (targa 4)...I'm not afraid to admit that all the other P-forum cars in this thread have mine beat on performance. However, $ for $ is a hugely different issue: 85,000 Nissan GTR dollars > 85,000 Porsche 997 dollars.
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #71  
sizquik's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 603
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 72
sizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond reputesizquik has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by silver329
Definitely a lot of badge snobs on this post. If this were boxing and we had to judge who the stronger fighter is "pound for pound" (in this case, i'm using price as the normalizing factor), the GTR would knock out the Porsche in the 1st rd. Period. I own my own C2S liike most of us here on this site and have no plans or desires to switch over to a GTR, but the guys saying a 997.2 TTS can smoke a stock GTR just don't get it. It costs TWICE as much! it SHOULD outperform. The equivalent p-car in the GTR price range is a 997S and on performance alone the GTR dominates. The other "qualatative" factors such as overall cabin feel, preference for the body shape, history, lineage...etc are serioulsy skewing most of the opinions on this thread (as one would almost expect on a porsche board).
Bingo!
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 01:20 PM
  #72  
jherbias's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 279
From: San Diego, CA
Rep Power: 37
jherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to beholdjherbias is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by zzzspeed
Please show me where I said it is just a Nissan. I never put the car down, just simply stated that I dont care for the looks of the inerior and exterior...which is my subjective opinion.
This was a fun experience for me whether I win or lose, and I would do it again because that is why I love performance cars.
I approach this forum for info and entertainment and I dont understand why some people need to come on here and try to insult each other with name calling and such.
My comments were not directed at you... notice I did not quote you. Also notice the statement, "this isn't everybody in this thread." They are just my opinions of people in general who need to go down the "it's just a XXXX" route when losing to a car of somewhat lesser-perceived pedigree.

Trust me, I am much more repsect on 6speed than on the BMW board I used to frequent... especially since everybody makes way more than me.
 

Last edited by jherbias; Jul 28, 2010 at 01:23 PM.
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 01:26 PM
  #73  
zzzspeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,121
From: San Diego
Rep Power: 101
zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !zzzspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jherbias
My comments were not directed at you... notice I did not quote you. Also notice the statement, "this isn't everybody in this thread." They are just my opinions of people in general who need to go down the "it's just a XXXX" route when losing to a car of somewhat lesser-perceived pedigree.

Trust me, I am much more repsect on 6speed than on the BMW board I used to frequent... especially since everybody makes way more than me.
Ok, it was my misunderstanding.
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 02:17 PM
  #74  
yrralis1's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,108
From: South Florida
Rep Power: 529
yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
That's the only part where we don't agree. I know for a fact that a 997.1TT is as fast or faster than a stock GT-R in a straight line. No mods required. They run almost the same 1/4 mile times, but the 997TT.1 is faster as the speed increases. It runs a quicker 60-130 time and 0-300 km/h, and reaches higher mph in the standing mile.

Again, (with a proper driver) a 997TT.1 is as fast or faster than a stock GT-R. No modifications required. This has already been proven.

Around a roadcourse however, the GT-R is the faster car, if that's what you are saying.
I keep thinking back to when my Turbo was stock . It seemed so slow in contrast to what it has become with time. The GtR really has some very impressive shifts and I have seen a few videos on yoitube of the Gtr beating the stock tt. It seems plausible . My car was stock for only the first 200 miles so its hard to remember.

In my very limited brief sprints with my current setup .. I pulled one off the line and had had 1 full length out of first gear. That was enough for me. Gtr driver was amazed.

Another GtR had a 4 car length head start plus he had momentum and hit the pedal first and within a few seconds I caught him.

The stock Turbo would have faced a much tougher time. Maybe you're right.. but either way --it would be close .

I had consided a GtR to replace my 4th car (The Honda Si) at some point but there's a few things i don't like aout the car . I don't like the explanation given about launch cointrol . I don't like the customer waiver where the manufacturer has customers sign off in advance on certain warranty items.
 

Last edited by yrralis1; Jul 28, 2010 at 02:19 PM.
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 03:27 PM
  #75  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by yrralis1
I keep thinking back to when my Turbo was stock . It seemed so slow in contrast to what it has become with time. The GtR really has some very impressive shifts and I have seen a few videos on yoitube of the Gtr beating the stock tt. It seems plausible . My car was stock for only the first 200 miles so its hard to remember.

In my very limited brief sprints with my current setup .. I pulled one off the line and had had 1 full length out of first gear. That was enough for me. Gtr driver was amazed.

Another GtR had a 4 car length head start plus he had momentum and hit the pedal first and within a few seconds I caught him.

The stock Turbo would have faced a much tougher time. Maybe you're right.. but either way --it would be close .

I had consided a GtR to replace my 4th car (The Honda Si) at some point but there's a few things i don't like aout the car . I don't like the explanation given about launch cointrol . I don't like the customer waiver where the manufacturer has customers sign off in advance on certain warranty items.
This is the only video I can find of them stock vs stock (at least, I think they are stock): http://www.streetfire.net/video/pors...gtr_194699.htm

This is a stock GT-R vs a stock 997.1 GT2:
http://www.youtube.com/user/m5boardd.../3/Q3GVoXbUeH4

And this is a stock GT-R vs a stock 997.2TT PDK:
http://www.youtube.com/user/m5boardd...37/ee6T-TIzTk4
 

Last edited by Divexxtreme; Jul 28, 2010 at 04:56 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 PM.