997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

CPO worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 10:46 AM
  #16  
Jack667's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 805
From: ATL
Rep Power: 64
Jack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by Mark Ducati
My 2009 was 11 months old when I got it CPO... still has the factory warranty until September 2013.

Since my car has the remaining 2 year warranty, I don't understand why it was CPO'd?
Mark, I think you're entitled to 6 years of coverage from the in-service date, with CPO. (if your car was out of warranty when you bought it, you'd get 2 years from the date you bought it)

I don't think your car (as an 09) was put in service in September, 2007, so I'll bet there's something wrong with your facts (either non-CPO) or you have coverage beyond Sept 2013. Or - are you saying that you have original factory coverage until 2013, and then CPO coverage until 2015? If so, that is very cool. With that said, if it was me, I'd be very careful about messing with things that would void parts of that warranty, such as screwing with the calipers, but - thats just me....
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 11:00 AM
  #17  
jhbrennan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,260
From: Austin
Rep Power: 770
jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Jack667
Mark, I think you're entitled to 6 years of coverage from the in-service date, with CPO. (if your car was out of warranty when you bought it, you'd get 2 years from the date you bought it)

I don't think your car (as an 09) was put in service in September, 2007, so I'll bet there's something wrong with your facts (either non-CPO) or you have coverage beyond Sept 2013. Or - are you saying that you have original factory coverage until 2013, and then CPO coverage until 2015? If so, that is very cool. With that said, if it was me, I'd be very careful about messing with things that would void parts of that warranty, such as screwing with the calipers, but - thats just me....
Also Mark, do you have the CPO sticker afixed to the inside of the driver's door jamb and did you get all the CPO paperwork with the pruchase?
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #18  
monojohn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 190
From: minneapolis
Rep Power: 27
monojohn is just really nicemonojohn is just really nicemonojohn is just really nicemonojohn is just really nice
I have received a new engine under the CPO program. Thank goodness.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 11:29 AM
  #19  
Nthusiast's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 187
From: New York
Rep Power: 32
Nthusiast is a splendid one to beholdNthusiast is a splendid one to beholdNthusiast is a splendid one to beholdNthusiast is a splendid one to beholdNthusiast is a splendid one to beholdNthusiast is a splendid one to beholdNthusiast is a splendid one to behold
very worthwhile

I purchased an '07 C4S 1 year ago and during a normal service the technician found a tiny leak of the RMS...they took everything apart and fixed it at no cost. Although I'm still under the normal warranty, the CPO offers a piece of mind knowing that anything can go wrong and it'll be taken care of.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #20  
ultradriver1000's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 47
From: Houston, Tx
Rep Power: 17
ultradriver1000 is infamous around these parts
I'd probably go for the CPO because I know how I'm going to be driving the car. I drive my cars hard, and would hate to toss in a 10K+ engine if something failed.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #21  
P997S's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,218
From: Florida
Rep Power: 69
P997S is infamous around these partsP997S is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by buckwheat986
not exactly...in mid 2008 porsche changed the CPO warranty coverage so it is basically an extension of the new car warranty.
I did not know that - makes CPO a must...bumper to bumper is great...im surprised they changed it
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #22  
Rfong's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
From: San Francisco
Rep Power: 20
Rfong is infamous around these parts
After reading the 20 responses to my original question about CPO's worth it?, I have concluded it has been BAD that the CPO's have been GOOD.

BAD because so many major problems have surfaced in a relatively new model that required the use of the warranty, but GOOD because the CPO came to the rescue and saved those owners big bucks.

I am surprised that so many catastrophic disasters, like blown engines, have occurred. Or course we don't know how many of these failures were driver error and how many were defective parts so I temper my opinion with this unknown.

It seems a CPO is a good idea combined with a PPI to discover faults that can be used to drive the price down enough to cover the cost of the CPO.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 02:44 PM
  #23  
NorthVan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,875
From: Vancouver
Rep Power: 684
NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Rfong
After reading the 20 responses to my original question about CPO's worth it?, I have concluded it has been BAD that the CPO's have been GOOD.

BAD because so many major problems have surfaced in a relatively new model that required the use of the warranty, but GOOD because the CPO came to the rescue and saved those owners big bucks.

I am surprised that so many catastrophic disasters, like blown engines, have occurred. Or course we don't know how many of these failures were driver error and how many were defective parts so I temper my opinion with this unknown.

It seems a CPO is a good idea combined with a PPI to discover faults that can be used to drive the price down enough to cover the cost of the CPO.
There were over 100,000 997's produced in the first 3 years, and to have a few engines go is not bad. These cars are very well built and most of us have very few if any problems at all. I still stick to the fact that things will break, and to have a warranty that covers you is a way of having a predictable cost of ownership. My warranty expired in April, and I bought a third party warranty for 5 more years.

All of my vehicles have extended warranties, it covers me, but it also makes them easier to sell if I decide it is time for a change.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 02:49 PM
  #24  
997 rolls's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 461
From: Maryland
Rep Power: 41
997 rolls is a glorious beacon of light997 rolls is a glorious beacon of light997 rolls is a glorious beacon of light997 rolls is a glorious beacon of light997 rolls is a glorious beacon of light997 rolls is a glorious beacon of light
I wouldn't buy a previously owned high line car without an extended warranty. Penny wise and pound foolish without it.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 02:56 PM
  #25  
utkinpol's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,122
From: Natick, MA
Rep Power: 163
utkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by NorthVan
There were over 100,000 997's produced in the first 3 years, and to have a few engines go is not bad.
they all do go, when you push them. it is in M96/97 DNA I think.

http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforum...96-engine.html

at least I do not have much illusions about it and $8K or so for replacement one is not overly bad.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 03:32 PM
  #26  
jhbrennan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,260
From: Austin
Rep Power: 770
jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !jhbrennan Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Rfong
After reading the 20 responses to my original question about CPO's worth it?, I have concluded it has been BAD that the CPO's have been GOOD.

BAD because so many major problems have surfaced in a relatively new model that required the use of the warranty, but GOOD because the CPO came to the rescue and saved those owners big bucks.

I am surprised that so many catastrophic disasters, like blown engines, have occurred. Or course we don't know how many of these failures were driver error and how many were defective parts so I temper my opinion with this unknown.

It seems a CPO is a good idea combined with a PPI to discover faults that can be used to drive the price down enough to cover the cost of the CPO.
"so many" - hardly a representative sample.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #27  
478100's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 24
From: Bellingham, WA
Rep Power: 0
478100 has a spectacular aura about478100 has a spectacular aura about
BAD because so many major problems have surfaced in a relatively new model that required the use of the warranty, but GOOD because the CPO came to the rescue and saved those owners big bucks.

I am surprised that so many catastrophic disasters, like blown engines, have occurred. Or course we don't know how many of these failures were driver error and how many were defective parts so I temper my opinion with this unknown.


Please bear in mind that these forums (6Speed & Rennlist) represent the (vocal) minority of P car owners. There are many 10's of thousands 911's being driving in this country without the catastrophic disasters, like blown engines as described here. These cars are very reliable as supported by industry data. In any event, I like the peace of mind with a CPO.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 05:41 PM
  #28  
P997S's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,218
From: Florida
Rep Power: 69
P997S is infamous around these partsP997S is infamous around these parts
my porsches have been better quality than the mercedes and bmws i have owned..All 3 are good but i am very confident in my porsche - exceptional quality and reliability. That said, I still sleep better knowing I am under warranty.
 
Old Oct 4, 2010 | 06:41 PM
  #29  
cym's Avatar
cym
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 23
From: New York
Rep Power: 0
cym is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by utkinpol
at least I do not have much illusions about it and $8K or so for replacement one is not overly bad.
8k? I thought I read somewhere that it was closer to 20k for the 997.1's? Perhaps the difference between an "S" vs non-S? Or is it just who you go to?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speedsterr
Automobiles For Sale
14
Oct 26, 2015 09:18 AM
MeddlingKid
Automobiles For Sale
5
Oct 20, 2015 07:43 AM
Iowa911
991
18
Oct 4, 2015 01:07 PM
metzkaro
997
2
Sep 30, 2015 12:48 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:37 PM.