997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Inherent aerodynamic instability in the 997?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 09:01 AM
  #31  
mike993c2s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 15
From: SF East Bay
Rep Power: 0
mike993c2s is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Tcc1999
At L/S not too certain b/c I wasn't watching the speedo - 130's anyway and not very consistently. At TH, however, on three, only three ocassions I nailed the final turn (presents like a double apex) going into the straight and the car simply took off. Typically, after I butcher that last turn, I can only get up to about 125 to 135 depending on how late I want to break (how brave I feel) going into turn 1. A buddy of mine who races SCCA had no problem hitting 140 (in my old S) in the straight at TH but he brakes REALLY late into Turn 1. It's really amazing to see what these cars can do when your a passenger with someone who has lots of experience!
That's what I thought. 130s on your speedometer would make more sense. As you know, it's a pretty big difference between 130s and 140s. Besides, the speedometer on most cars tend to show a sizable error by the time you get over 100 mph, usually overestimating the actual speed by a good margin (I recall some car magazine doing such testing some years back). What would be more accurate would be speeds based on data acquisition systems.
 
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 09:42 AM
  #32  
FlaHeel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 845
From: Viera, Florida
Rep Power: 53
FlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of light
Had 991, 964, 993 and 997 and never really felt the front end wanting to fly, bu I've felt the **** end whipping around way too many times.
 
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 09:43 AM
  #33  
FlaHeel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 845
From: Viera, Florida
Rep Power: 53
FlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of light
Make that 911, not 991. Sorry.
 
Old Nov 9, 2011 | 10:02 AM
  #34  
utkinpol's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,122
From: Natick, MA
Rep Power: 163
utkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond reputeutkinpol has a reputation beyond repute
lexus becomes airborne at 125 mph pretty much. i got my base with no aero kit car to 155 somewhat mph once, it was perfectly planted at that speed. on track with up to 130-140 mph it is also fine.
i also asked a lot about track lap times in street cars with aero and without - no one gave any data that simple stock aero parts improve anything. it is all for looks.
where is starts to work for real are cup car sized rear wing (that one that reminds a part of a piano) and properly done custom front splitter. plus you need to rework front area to ensure proper air movement.

again, 'as is' street 97 cars have good aerodynamics, there is no need to do anything. stock street 'aero kit' is also mostly for looks, as well as stock regular gt3 aero kit with small rear wing.
 
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 10:17 AM
  #35  
GregM3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 77
From: Vancouver, Canada
Rep Power: 25
GregM3 is a name known to allGregM3 is a name known to allGregM3 is a name known to allGregM3 is a name known to allGregM3 is a name known to allGregM3 is a name known to all
Originally Posted by last911
The small deployable spoilers used on the 911 since the 964 generation in 1993, don't actually produce "downforce" in the truest sense of the word. What they due is "spoil" the air stream as it comes down the rear window and off the car. The backwards wing shape of a 911 that you noticed produces a low pressure area at the rear af the car. This combined with high pressure beneath the car prices lift and lightens the rear axle load. By breaking up the air flow, the low pressure area is reduced, reducing or negating the lift. So is that adding downforce? No, it's just reducing the lift affect.

Now, on the 911 race cars you mentioned, they do run very sizable rear wings to increase high speed down force and grip in fast corners. They also create a lot of drag. But the speed and stability gained in the high speed corners more than offsets the reduction in top speed on the straits.

Hope you find a 911 to your liking. They are fun, somewhat quirky cars with a ton of history. I recently traded a Ferrari F430 to get back in the dependable, properly engineered 911. "You can sleep with a Ferrari, but you will more likely marry a Porsche".
Great post Fred...felt like I was listening to my prof of... well, so long ago now.
Greg
 
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 06:23 AM
  #36  
Jack667's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 805
From: ATL
Rep Power: 64
Jack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant futureJack667 has a brilliant future
Minor nit on intro of deplorable spoilers, was 1989 for 964. The 964 series debuted in 1989 with the C4 and then 1990 with the C2. All 964s had deplorable spoilers, with the exception of those with fixed spoilers like RSA, etc
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PelicanParts.com
GT3/GT2/GT Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 25, 2015 03:27 PM
PelicanParts.com
997 Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 25, 2015 03:16 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:41 AM.