Who has gone from a standard to a turbo? Why?
__________________
2011 Carrera S - sports car
2007 GT3 - track car
I eventually want to get a turbo. I haven't driven one yet because I don't want to be upset when I get back into mine. I don't track my car, but I do drive fast and I have put my foot all the way down a number of times. I have spoken to guys who race 911s (on the track) and they agreed with the other person and said the suspension is soft. I also agree with everyone here who wrote you need to drive them all. I would personally not own a Boxster, but I did drive the Cayman and that car handles really well. I used to own a Corvette and for pure power, you would have to get a turbo to have the same feeling of power. However, the quality of the car and how safe you feel in it can't compare. Also, the handling/braking are superior in the Porsche, but it takes a bit to get used to the weight behind you. I was really great at driving a Vette or M3 hard, but I'm still not at the same level with my C2S. I do want the turbo for that g-force feel when you step on it, but the fact that it's still a Porsche. To me, it's the best of all worlds (since I won't/don't track) that I care about, which is style, handling, power and I'll say it.. prestige.
I eventually want to get a turbo. I haven't driven one yet because I don't want to be upset when I get back into mine. I don't track my car, but I do drive fast and I have put my foot all the way down a number of times. I have spoken to guys who race 911s (on the track) and they agreed with the other person and said the suspension is soft. I also agree with everyone here who wrote you need to drive them all. I would personally not own a Boxster, but I did drive the Cayman and that car handles really well. I used to own a Corvette and for pure power, you would have to get a turbo to have the same feeling of power. However, the quality of the car and how safe you feel in it can't compare. Also, the handling/braking are superior in the Porsche, but it takes a bit to get used to the weight behind you. I was really great at driving a Vette or M3 hard, but I'm still not at the same level with my C2S. I do want the turbo for that g-force feel when you step on it, but the fact that it's still a Porsche. To me, it's the best of all worlds (since I won't/don't track) that I care about, which is style, handling, power and I'll say it.. prestige.
Sorry off topic - I lived on the border of Foster City/San Mateo CA before I moved here 11 months ago by the way.
Last edited by michaeldantep; Jan 26, 2012 at 02:23 PM.
I've driven both, I like the look of the Turbo, but I don't track my car. I live in a city where the roads are all 25mph and would rather not end up in County lock up. That being said, for me, it wasn't a matter of money, both were affordable. Financially, I couldn't justify the Turbo over the C2S for my driving style. I choose the C2S, added the Techart lips/splitters and the big spoiler. Couldn't be happier.
Thanks guys, for all your opinions.
Regarding as to whether or not a Porsche would be "right" for me is something I'd like to experience for myself as there is no one within a 100 mile radius that rents Porsches. One determination could be made while test-driving; though in my experience, I never really received a full driving experience through the small 5-15 minute window the dealer gives you and is usually in the car as well.
I like to "feel the road" as I'm driving and I'm inclined to believe that Porsche makes cars that would fulfill that kind of need for me. I am leaning towards buying the convertible version so hence, the Cayman is probably no longer on my radar. Even though I like that the price of admission is noticeably che...more economical than the 911, many used ones I see aren't equipped with the Audio options I want.
As for the Turbo vs. Carrera S debate, I thought about if I ever have a definitive need for the speed of a Turbo...maybe not, but the power would be at my disposal. But alas, I need to buy a PDK model, so don't think any less of me. I think just that requirement alone might leave me ending up with a 4S cabrio. If you guys can also consider that the 4S would double as a GT (grand tourer), then that is likely what will be in my driveway come March.
Regarding as to whether or not a Porsche would be "right" for me is something I'd like to experience for myself as there is no one within a 100 mile radius that rents Porsches. One determination could be made while test-driving; though in my experience, I never really received a full driving experience through the small 5-15 minute window the dealer gives you and is usually in the car as well.
I like to "feel the road" as I'm driving and I'm inclined to believe that Porsche makes cars that would fulfill that kind of need for me. I am leaning towards buying the convertible version so hence, the Cayman is probably no longer on my radar. Even though I like that the price of admission is noticeably che...more economical than the 911, many used ones I see aren't equipped with the Audio options I want.
As for the Turbo vs. Carrera S debate, I thought about if I ever have a definitive need for the speed of a Turbo...maybe not, but the power would be at my disposal. But alas, I need to buy a PDK model, so don't think any less of me. I think just that requirement alone might leave me ending up with a 4S cabrio. If you guys can also consider that the 4S would double as a GT (grand tourer), then that is likely what will be in my driveway come March.
Thanks guys, for all your opinions.
Regarding as to whether or not a Porsche would be "right" for me is something I'd like to experience for myself as there is no one within a 100 mile radius that rents Porsches. One determination could be made while test-driving; though in my experience, I never really received a full driving experience through the small 5-15 minute window the dealer gives you and is usually in the car as well.
I like to "feel the road" as I'm driving and I'm inclined to believe that Porsche makes cars that would fulfill that kind of need for me. I am leaning towards buying the convertible version so hence, the Cayman is probably no longer on my radar. Even though I like that the price of admission is noticeably che...more economical than the 911, many used ones I see aren't equipped with the Audio options I want.
As for the Turbo vs. Carrera S debate, I thought about if I ever have a definitive need for the speed of a Turbo...maybe not, but the power would be at my disposal. But alas, I need to buy a PDK model, so don't think any less of me. I think just that requirement alone might leave me ending up with a 4S cabrio. If you guys can also consider that the 4S would double as a GT (grand tourer), then that is likely what will be in my driveway come March.
Regarding as to whether or not a Porsche would be "right" for me is something I'd like to experience for myself as there is no one within a 100 mile radius that rents Porsches. One determination could be made while test-driving; though in my experience, I never really received a full driving experience through the small 5-15 minute window the dealer gives you and is usually in the car as well.
I like to "feel the road" as I'm driving and I'm inclined to believe that Porsche makes cars that would fulfill that kind of need for me. I am leaning towards buying the convertible version so hence, the Cayman is probably no longer on my radar. Even though I like that the price of admission is noticeably che...more economical than the 911, many used ones I see aren't equipped with the Audio options I want.
As for the Turbo vs. Carrera S debate, I thought about if I ever have a definitive need for the speed of a Turbo...maybe not, but the power would be at my disposal. But alas, I need to buy a PDK model, so don't think any less of me. I think just that requirement alone might leave me ending up with a 4S cabrio. If you guys can also consider that the 4S would double as a GT (grand tourer), then that is likely what will be in my driveway come March.
I would never buy a Cayman because the styling is just awkward, the same should be said of the Panamera. Just like the Bangle butts disasters. Compare them with the looks and styling of a Maserati and Aston and somebody dropped the ball or the drawing pencil. The 911 series has the looks and the ***** to back it up. All the way!! Just my 2 cents.
Test drive 5 cars. Focus on different things each time. Porsches have a lot of road noise. Handling is completely different. Also, you are much lower to the ground, like a sports car should be. Completely different feel that is defined by the difference between a sports car and a sports coupe. I drove multiple cars with multiple dealers before I bought my 997 and my M3. It's your money, decide wisely. Oh, and I bought the 997 private party in the end because I believe that will give you the best feel of the car's history.
just a couple of quick comments:
i've owned 10 911's dating back to the early 80's and am currently driving an 06' 997 C4S w/ x51, aero kit, msrp @ $124k, so nicely optioned. my last car was an 02' 996tt. my original intent was to buy a 997tt, but was about $10k out of my price range. i paid $62k for my car last year, and it had only 6.5k mi. a nice, reasonably miliaged 997tt can be had for the $80k range, so if that is within budget, i would prefer the tt. however, very much am currently satisfied w/ the NA 997. the biggest concern other than $ for the TT are tickets. i went over 15 years without a speeding ticket and got 4 within a year owning the tt. my perception was that i did not change my driving behaviour, but facts say otherwise. i do miss the power/tq of the tt. i could go on and on, gt1 block, etc, etc.... drive both, consider $ and go for it...
i've owned 10 911's dating back to the early 80's and am currently driving an 06' 997 C4S w/ x51, aero kit, msrp @ $124k, so nicely optioned. my last car was an 02' 996tt. my original intent was to buy a 997tt, but was about $10k out of my price range. i paid $62k for my car last year, and it had only 6.5k mi. a nice, reasonably miliaged 997tt can be had for the $80k range, so if that is within budget, i would prefer the tt. however, very much am currently satisfied w/ the NA 997. the biggest concern other than $ for the TT are tickets. i went over 15 years without a speeding ticket and got 4 within a year owning the tt. my perception was that i did not change my driving behaviour, but facts say otherwise. i do miss the power/tq of the tt. i could go on and on, gt1 block, etc, etc.... drive both, consider $ and go for it...
But another side of me begs to rationalize the two evils: economic (4S) or emotion (TT)? I don't know; I'm just rambling at this point.
I had a 996 Carrera, an 06 997 4S and now a Turbo S.
For me, wanting more speed was the impetus. The Turbo's explosive power is simply too intoxicating and just plain fun... I could never go to a slower car.
For me, wanting more speed was the impetus. The Turbo's explosive power is simply too intoxicating and just plain fun... I could never go to a slower car.
I'm currently in an 09 C2S. For the past 6 months I've been trying to justify buying a turbo but I couldn't find any reason other than the speed. I love raw sound of my NA motor which is enhanced by TUBI - you can't get that in a turbo. Turbos sound muffled to me, even with aftermarket exhausts. I love the light steering feel of non-4 cars. I love knowing the fact that there are less moving parts which translate to less potential problems no matter how far in the future you look. I thought I would keep my C2S forever until I hopped in a GTS cab. The rest was history. There's really no words to describe the sensation of top down full throttle with PSE on while taking a curvy on ramp to a wide open highway. None. You can go faster in a turbo, but will you have the same audible sensation and steering feel? How much faster can you go any how? We all have to slow down at some point.
Last edited by tri; Jan 28, 2012 at 12:08 PM.



