997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

IMS replacement dilemma

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 08:50 PM
  #16  
holden997's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
From: Montreal, Canada
Rep Power: 15
holden997 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by m3drei
My engine number is well before 05 69507475, therefore I went in fairly certain it had the small replaceable bearings. I was warned by Flintworks and LN Engineering, although rare, they have seen early 05's with the upgraded bearing. I ran the vin and engine number through my dealer, they were not able to determine if I has the updated bearing. The general consensus is most early production 997's have the small replaceable bearing, the only way to know for sure is to remove the tranny and determine it visually. This topic is also on rennlist, and through other's suggestion, i vrified with my build sheet that the motor is original to the car, and had never be replaced.
You lucked out.

The upgraded bearing uses an IMS flange with a 22 mm nut. I'm assuming this is how your indie confirmed you have an upgraded bearing.

A 13mm nut is used on the smaller IMS bearing.
 
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 09:01 PM
  #17  
holden997's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
From: Montreal, Canada
Rep Power: 15
holden997 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by alpine-al
As they say, you can't believe everything that you read on the internet.

All 3.6L engines in the 997.1 from 2005 thru 2008 were the M96.05. Attached is the official list of all Porsche engines from 1952-2012 (see page 9).

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/93289189/Po..._1952-2012.pdf

.
The 997.1 engines (2005-2008):

M96/05 (3.6L), had the smaller IMS in the early production run and then switched to the upgraded IMS.

M97/01 (3.8L), also had the smaller IMS in the early production run and then switched to the upgraded IMS.
 
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 02:43 AM
  #18  
amge63's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 240
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 47
amge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by holden997
The 997.1 engines (2005-2008):

M96/05 (3.6L), had the smaller IMS in the early production run and then switched to the upgraded IMS.

M97/01 (3.8L), also had the smaller IMS in the early production run and then switched to the upgraded IMS.
Okay, thank you. This is good information in line with what I have understood in the past. However, the information with certain M96 engines having larger bearings was new to me and (maybe there is no answer) I am wondering if there are other identifiers in the serial numbers so the engine doesn't have to be opened to check...maybe that just need to be done to ensure my peace of mind.
 
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 06:33 AM
  #19  
MarioCorrea's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 7
From: Bogotá - Colombia
Rep Power: 0
MarioCorrea is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by alpine-al
As they say, you can't believe everything that you read on the internet.

All 3.6L engines in the 997.1 from 2005 thru 2008 were the M96.05. Attached is the official list of all Porsche engines from 1952-2012 (see page 9).

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/93289189/Po..._1952-2012.pdf

.
Thanks for the list!!! much appreciated.
 
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 07:27 AM
  #20  
kiddoutlaw's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 142
From: DFW - Texas
Rep Power: 19
kiddoutlaw is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by alpine-al
As they say, you can't believe everything that you read on the internet.

All 3.6L engines in the 997.1 from 2005 thru 2008 were the M96.05. Attached is the official list of all Porsche engines from 1952-2012 (see page 9).

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/93289189/Po..._1952-2012.pdf

.
+1 Thanks......
 
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 09:09 AM
  #21  
Gpjli's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,352
From: long island
Rep Power: 87
Gpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud ofGpjli has much to be proud of
Bottom line here: you have to look to be sure
 
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 11:15 AM
  #22  
lacrosse's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,230
From: Long Island, New York
Rep Power: 78
lacrosse has much to be proud oflacrosse has much to be proud oflacrosse has much to be proud oflacrosse has much to be proud oflacrosse has much to be proud oflacrosse has much to be proud oflacrosse has much to be proud oflacrosse has much to be proud oflacrosse has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Gpjli
Bottom line here: you have to look to be sure

Stop making sense!
 
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 04:20 PM
  #23  
DoninDEN's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,115
From: Denver, CO
Rep Power: 79
DoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond reputeDoninDEN has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by m3drei
I sent my 05 997 c2 off on Tues to get the IMS bearing retrofit done. I just got off the phone with my indie that my car has the revised m97 motor with the larger dual role IMS bearing, which is non serviceable without a tear down of the engine. I am impression the failure rate is significantly lower in m97's than m96's. I appreciate your guy's inputs!
Any chance that your Indie is wrong? I don't know, but there has been a lot of posts regarding the larger IMS bearings occurring as indicated in this thread. What does L&N say?
 
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 04:37 PM
  #24  
m3drei's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 110
From: Bay Area, CA
Rep Power: 19
m3drei is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by BED997
C2 and not C2S? What is the build date on the car?

I am a little suprised as I have called LN before when looking at 2005s and the feedback I received is that they rarely have seen any 2005 C2 models that had the larger bearing from the factory.

The C2S model switchover was likely sometime around Feb/March 2005 on the build date (the black sticker in your driver's door jamb).


If they can't do the IMS and they are already in there you could replace the RMS to the newest seal to prevent future leaks, do the clutch and have the shop remove the seal on the IMS bearing for future splash lubrication.
Originally Posted by DoninDEN
Any chance that your Indie is wrong? I don't know, but there has been a lot of posts regarding the larger IMS bearings occurring as indicated in this thread. What does L&N say?
I dont think so. The larger M97 bearing design is very different than the smaller M96. I spoke with LN, they told me you have seen a couple of 05's with the larger bearings, but it is uncommon. LN did advice to remove one of the bear seals to insure better lube.
 
Old Dec 8, 2012 | 04:51 PM
  #25  
Jasper1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 31
From: Raleigh, NC
Rep Power: 15
Jasper1 is infamous around these parts
To add to confusion, my '06 C2 Cab with a build date of October 2005 is listed (according to the Certificate of Authenticity) with an Engine Number: M96/03. Looking at the PET list, the M96/03 engines installed in 2005 are 320 horsepower. The PET list also has M96/05 Engines installed in 2005 on 997's (including Cabs) with 325 HP, which is the HP of '06 base Carerras. I guess I will try to see the engine number on the car tomorrow to verify what I have. Can anyone shed any light on this?
 
Old Dec 8, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #26  
amge63's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 240
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 47
amge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond reputeamge63 has a reputation beyond repute
At this point I can use a laugh. This image in my head comes to mind...Gunter, thinking about his hot date on Friday afternoon, quickly grabbed whatever nuts and bolts around him to put his last engine of the day together so he can get out early to see Katerina.

A few years later, bunch of guys on an internet forum cannot make heads or tails of what Gunter has done every Friday....The few engines that failed early were replaced under warranty, but a few manage to survive with evidence of Gunter's handiwork with larger bearings...
 
Old Dec 10, 2012 | 08:09 AM
  #27  
Dadio's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,342
From: USA
Rep Power: 104
Dadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond reputeDadio has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by m3drei
I sent my 05 997 c2 off on Tues to get the IMS bearing retrofit done. I just got off the phone with my indie that my car has the revised m97 motor with the larger dual role IMS bearing, which is non serviceable without a tear down of the engine. I am impression the failure rate is significantly lower in m97's than m96's. I appreciate your guy's inputs!
Go to LN Engineering site listed below if you want to know more about the issue. Lot's of disinformation on it all over the web.

http://www.lnengineering.com/ims.html
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
salesguy01
996
3
Mar 25, 2019 09:39 AM
docboy
996 Turbo / GT2
46
Sep 6, 2015 06:57 AM
GetALife75
New Member Introductions
2
Sep 3, 2015 12:22 PM
pshep138
Automobiles For Sale
3
Sep 1, 2015 09:45 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 AM.