997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Supercharger Install

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 01:25 PM
  #46  
MarcoRemius's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 64
From: Atlanta
Rep Power: 14
MarcoRemius is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by 808c2s
that is what enthusiasts are for! To feed each other ideas and inspiration for the next project .
Touche!

Do you have any dyno charts for the S/C setup you have on there now? Curious to see what the low-mid range torque looks like.

I drove a Vortech Supercharged VR6 and it was a DOG. Most likely b/c the setup wasn't sized right... which is why I'm curious about yours (properly sized).
 
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 02:14 PM
  #47  
808c2s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,364
From: Hawaii
Rep Power: 116
808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !
Unfortunately, I don't have dyno charts for the S/C. I have yet to find a Dyno operator that I trust. Instead, I would use Durametric testing of A/F to make sure the car is running safely with the modifications that I made. I also ran my cars against various other cars to see if there are any improvements.

I can tell you that with the original VF Kit with the 3.8" pulley, it's faster than a stock 997.1 C2S (355HP), 997.2 C2S (385HP), and can keep up with a stock 996TT. With a 3.6" pulley, it's faster than a stock 996TT, and kept up with a 997.1TT (480HP one). With the 3.4 pulley I am running now, I was surprised that it kept up with a 360 Modena.
 
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 02:23 PM
  #48  
3POINT8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 343
Rep Power: 27
3POINT8 is infamous around these parts
italdream - no engine light worries. yeah, if you can make the stretch a 997TT is probably a better car. may have to really search for the right prices for the SC.


Marco - my car feels doggish at the lower rpms. i took 808c2s advice and ordered a LWFW hopefully that helps.


808c2s - tell me more about this pulley!
 
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 06:03 PM
  #49  
blown996's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 172
From: boston
Rep Power: 25
blown996 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by GodLy
So SC way to go?
I had less issues with the supercharger kit than with the turbo. Took a While to work the bugs out. The supercharger felt like the same power curve with more power, turbo has a lot more low end torque. I also own a 997TT, feels better than both!
 
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 09:43 PM
  #50  
808c2s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,364
From: Hawaii
Rep Power: 116
808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !
Marco,
My power range does not become evident until 3000. It pretty much mimics a stock 997S power curve, but more of it and pulls until rev limiter kicks in. With the LWFW, the car is just more responsive due to the quicker rev to get to the power range.


Originally Posted by MarcoRemius
Curious to see what the low-mid range torque looks like.

I drove a Vortech Supercharged VR6 and it was a DOG. Most likely b/c the setup wasn't sized right... which is why I'm curious about yours (properly sized).
 
Old Jun 27, 2014 | 09:48 PM
  #51  
808c2s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,364
From: Hawaii
Rep Power: 116
808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !
You can run this pulley, but you have to make sure your A/F is ok. With this pulley, you will also need to increase your fuel flow, as well as, get a smaller serpentine belt, obviously.

Originally Posted by 3POINT8
808c2s - tell me more about this pulley!
 
Old Jun 28, 2014 | 01:36 AM
  #52  
808c2s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,364
From: Hawaii
Rep Power: 116
808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !
I believe there's no SC Kit for a DFI engine, yet. Not PDK. Correct me if I am wrong.

Originally Posted by GodLy
Thanks for the info I am looking to get 997.2 S but the sad thing is that there is no SC for PDK so i am confused :|
 
Old Jun 28, 2014 | 06:55 AM
  #53  
MarcoRemius's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 64
From: Atlanta
Rep Power: 14
MarcoRemius is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by 808c2s
Marco,
My power range does not become evident until 3000. It pretty much mimics a stock 997S power curve, but more of it and pulls until rev limiter kicks in. With the LWFW, the car is just more responsive due to the quicker rev to get to the power range.
Marco - my car feels doggish at the lower rpms. i took 808c2s advice and ordered a LWFW hopefully that helps.
Kind of what I expected. It's not a bad thing. It's actually quite expected. The S/C isn't efficient at those engine speeds, so it's essentially using more power than it's creating, giving you the doggish feeling. But I bet it's mind blowing up north!

I believe there's no SC Kit for a DFI engine, yet. Not PDK. Correct me if I am wrong.
Correct, at least not as a product through VF. Most likely b/c of the difficulties in changing the fuel metering/injectors on the DFI motors. It can be done, but they probably feels there's not much of a return on investment for that market.
 
Old Sep 24, 2014 | 03:49 PM
  #54  
blown996's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 172
From: boston
Rep Power: 25
blown996 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by 808c2s
that is what enthusiasts are for! To feed each other ideas and inspiration for the next project .

The idea of a 4.0L S/C is tempting. I am currently running a smaller pulley and a different resistor on the VF-Engineering S/C with the stock 3.8L for a while now, and thus far, the engine has been holding up rather well. I suspect the current tune should do ok with the 4.0L upgrade....I hope
808C2S, do you mind me asking what type resistor you used?
 
Old Sep 24, 2014 | 08:17 PM
  #55  
808c2s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,364
From: Hawaii
Rep Power: 116
808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !
Np .

Originally Posted by blown996
808c2s, do you mind me asking what type resistor you used?
 
Old Sep 27, 2014 | 10:37 AM
  #56  
sxhsthth's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
From: mr
Rep Power: 0
sxhsthth is infamous around these parts
Congrats on your purchase. You will enjoy it for years to come. Make sure you change the S/C gear oil if you haven't done so. I do mine every 3-5000 miles, even if it's overkill.
 
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 04:45 PM
  #57  
m34door's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 40
From: new york
Rep Power: 18
m34door is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by MarcoRemius
I disagree with all the "turbo" people.

It doesn't matter what "power adder" you add to a normally aspirated car. Every time you bump the HP higher than stock, you'll always put extra wear and tear on parts. When tuned right, both Superchargers & TurboChargers provide good power gains.

Centrifugal supercharger like the VF will always be at a disadvantage b/c they're essentially a turbo cold side bolted to a belt drive. It's very difficult to get the right impeller speed / mass flow combination which is why I've found most centrifugal type SC's to lack the low end grunt you get from a roots type blower.

Turbos on the other hand, while often build more power, introduce a lot more complexity and heat into the system... making them inherently less reliable and more hassle from a maintenance perspective.

Given the tight quarters of the 911 engine bay and the desire to keep heat levels as low as possible, I think the SC is a fantastic option for these cars... especially if people are seeing mid 400 HP numbers at the wheels.

Everyone has their own opinions, tastes, and wallets. But IMHO, I'd take a SC 911 with a solid tune over an aftermarket turbo setup any day.




Totally agree with what was said. I am toying with the idea myself
 
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 08:39 PM
  #58  
Boomer1990's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 57
From: Federal Way, WA
Rep Power: 23
Boomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by 808c2s
Marco,

You should consider going NA 4.0L upgrade with LN Engineering or Flat6! The stock ECU will adapt and make power.

I am currently toying with the idea of going to a 4.0L with lower 10:1 compression for the SC . Talk about potential issues
Following an IMS failure on my C4, I am in the process of a 3.6 to 4.0 upgrade via LN, and SC'd via VF. Hoping for 400rwhp on dyno.

Trying to get my shop, a 6speed sponsor, to do a build thread. Hope they can do it.
 
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 12:13 AM
  #59  
808c2s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,364
From: Hawaii
Rep Power: 116
808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !808c2s Is a GOD !
Sorry to hear about your IMS failure, but this misfortune is allowing you to do a 4.0L upgrade! Looking forward to your build!

I spoke with Stephen from LN regarding the upgrade, and he does not recommend a 4.0L for F/I, unless you accept the possible consequences. He does recommend going with a 3.8L if you have F/I in mind. I am still planning on the 4.0L upgrade, but need to do more research. Are you planning to get a custom tune from VF?

Originally Posted by Boomer1990
Following an IMS failure on my C4, I am in the process of a 3.6 to 4.0 upgrade via LN, and SC'd via VF. Hoping for 400rwhp on dyno.

Trying to get my shop, a 6speed sponsor, to do a build thread. Hope they can do it.
 
Old Oct 6, 2014 | 06:54 AM
  #60  
Boomer1990's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 57
From: Federal Way, WA
Rep Power: 23
Boomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to beholdBoomer1990 is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by 808c2s
Sorry to hear about your IMS failure, but this misfortune is allowing you to do a 4.0L upgrade! Looking forward to your build!

I spoke with Stephen from LN regarding the upgrade, and he does not recommend a 4.0L for F/I, unless you accept the possible consequences. He does recommend going with a 3.8L if you have F/I in mind. I am still planning on the 4.0L upgrade, but need to do more research. Are you planning to get a custom tune from VF?
There will be a custom tune, along with other mods to the SC system, to help avoid issues down the line.

Plus, the car is a sunny day weekend driver, usually with the wife acting as a "governor" on my spirited driving efforts.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM.