997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

998 - Flat 8 Or Not To Flat 8

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 07:26 PM
  #61  
Le Chef's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 379
From: Chicago USA
Rep Power: 38
Le Chef is infamous around these parts
Jesus!

Does NO ONE around here understand the 911? It's rear engined, and Porsche have said publicly it will never be mid-engined. Porsche have also said the 911 will never have a V8, or a flat-8. If you don't understand tradition and what it means go by a new generation VW Beetle.
 
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #62  
cdaniels's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 304
From: Cary, NC
Rep Power: 33
cdaniels is infamous around these parts
Easy...Easy....Le Chef.....we are having a fantasy here and Jessica Alba just sat in my lap...and you go and wake me up....somebody needs a hug!

but you do have a realistic point..it's all about sales and marketing and the 911 brand is so established and gains more sales each year....I'm sure they don't want to screw that up.....but we can dream.....


Originally Posted by Le Chef
Does NO ONE around here understand the 911? It's rear engined, and Porsche have said publicly it will never be mid-engined. Porsche have also said the 911 will never have a V8, or a flat-8. If you don't understand tradition and what it means go by a new generation VW Beetle.
 
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #63  
PeterK's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 389
From: san antonio, tx
Rep Power: 35
PeterK is infamous around these parts
Hmm, a flat 8. Has such a thing even been done outside of the realm of aircraft engines?
 
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #64  
cdaniels's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 304
From: Cary, NC
Rep Power: 33
cdaniels is infamous around these parts
The ALMS Porsche 3.4 8 cylinder is a flat 8 meaning the cylinders are horizonally opposed ....just like a Ferrari engine..the purpose is to keep weight and the center of gravity as low as possible....and yes Porsche has made aircraft engines as well......tanks, tractors, etc....


Originally Posted by PeterK
Hmm, a flat 8. Has such a thing even been done outside of the realm of aircraft engines?
 
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #65  
Le Chef's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 379
From: Chicago USA
Rep Power: 38
Le Chef is infamous around these parts
Flat - 8

Originally Posted by cdaniels
The ALMS Porsche 3.4 8 cylinder is a flat 8 meaning the cylinders are horizonally opposed ....just like a Ferrari engine..the purpose is to keep weight and the center of gravity as low as possible....and yes Porsche has made aircraft engines as well......tanks, tractors, etc....
Porsche raced flat-8 engined cars over 30 years ago - it's part of their DNA. Ferrari OTOH have never produced a flat-8, but have produced flat-12's (see Ferrari 312 F1 race car and 512 Berlinetta Boxer road car.

Btw the ALMS car is a V8, not a flat-8.
 

Last edited by Le Chef; Apr 27, 2008 at 07:33 PM.
Old May 9, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #66  
Tuskir's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 633
From: Miami
Rep Power: 46
Tuskir has a spectacular aura aboutTuskir has a spectacular aura about
In my opinion, Porsche should use the Gallardo/R8 platform for 998, which should be possible given their other joint projects with VW Group (Cayenne/Toureg/Q7 all same platform). They need a V8 to keep up with the competition, its as simple as that. Every car in their category has at least 420hp+ V8's (M3, RS4, Vette, C63 AMG, etc), while 911 only as 350hp. For 2+2 car, they could make a panamera coupe, so 911 will basically be their hardcore 2-seat sports car instead of a GT it is now.

Here is what I think they should do as far as engines:
Base 911: N/A V8 430hp+
911 Turbo: Twin-turbo V8 600hp+
911 GT2: N/A V10 or V12 700hp+
Next Porsche Supercar: Twin-turbo V10 or V12 900hp+
 

Last edited by Tuskir; May 9, 2008 at 05:35 PM.
Old May 9, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #67  
UBoat Commander's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,801
From: Los Angeles, CA
Rep Power: 97
UBoat Commander is just really niceUBoat Commander is just really niceUBoat Commander is just really niceUBoat Commander is just really niceUBoat Commander is just really nice
^ Sorry dude. But you know nothing about Porsches. Just go purchase an R8 if that's what you want. But every guy on the street with a 997S will kick your *** in every category.
 
Old May 10, 2008 | 01:29 AM
  #68  
Tuskir's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 633
From: Miami
Rep Power: 46
Tuskir has a spectacular aura aboutTuskir has a spectacular aura about
R8 won every comparison test against 911

Originally Posted by UBoat Commander
^ Sorry dude. But you know nothing about Porsches. Just go purchase an R8 if that's what you want. But every guy on the street with a 997S will kick your *** in every category.
I know nothing about Porsche? What rock have you been living under? Every single comparison that Audi R8 was put against a 911, it won. Just to name a few:

Car and Driver
997 turbo VS Audi R8
R8= 1st place
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...st+page-4.html


Motor Trend
997 4S vs Audi R8
R8 = 1st place
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._dynamics.html


Top Gear
"R8 is a better car"
Audi R8= 1:24.4
911 S = 1:26.2
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zI8ChK3xQDs&feature=related
^ That is 2 seconds per lap faster "dude", which is a huge difference in performance.

DrivenMag.com
"R8 is superior"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JTgtHb3hLsA&feature=related


Fifth Gear
"you should definitely put your name down for an R8"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=dJW3mbROXJQ


911 is an amazing car, but a V8 mid-engined platform is far superior to a 6-cylinder rear-engined platform. Porsche cannot be using the same platform forever, they have to evolve. If not, they will continue to be outperformed.
 

Last edited by Tuskir; May 10, 2008 at 01:33 AM.
Old May 10, 2008 | 01:54 AM
  #69  
CURI0's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,363
From: Malibu
Rep Power: 119
CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tuskir
In my opinion, Porsche should use the Gallardo/R8 platform for 998, which should be possible given their other joint projects with VW Group (Cayenne/Toureg/Q7 all same platform). They need a V8 to keep up with the competition, its as simple as that. Every car in their category has at least 420hp+ V8's (M3, RS4, Vette, C63 AMG, etc), while 911 only as 350hp. For 2+2 car, they could make a panamera coupe, so 911 will basically be their hardcore 2-seat sports car instead of a GT it is now.

Here is what I think they should do as far as engines:
Base 911: N/A V8 430hp+
911 Turbo: Twin-turbo V8 600hp+
911 GT2: N/A V10 or V12 700hp+
Next Porsche Supercar: Twin-turbo V10 or V12 900hp+
RETARD ALERT
 
Old May 10, 2008 | 04:09 AM
  #70  
GT3PTY's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 141
From: Panama
Rep Power: 24
GT3PTY is infamous around these parts
Keep in mind that the R8 is the biggest car that Audi has... and in Racing the R10 Diesel car..... both get demolished by Porsches GT3, GT2, and CG, the race car, the RS Spyder just eats their race car...

Buy an R8 and then re-sell in 2 years for nothing....buy a PORSCHE 911 and keep a jewel! no need to sale....its a PORSCHE!


Originally Posted by Tuskir
I know nothing about Porsche? What rock have you been living under? Every single comparison that Audi R8 was put against a 911, it won. Just to name a few:

Car and Driver
997 turbo VS Audi R8
R8= 1st place
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...st+page-4.html


Motor Trend
997 4S vs Audi R8
R8 = 1st place
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._dynamics.html


Top Gear
"R8 is a better car"
Audi R8= 1:24.4
911 S = 1:26.2
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zI8ChK3xQDs&feature=related
^ That is 2 seconds per lap faster "dude", which is a huge difference in performance.

DrivenMag.com
"R8 is superior"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JTgtHb3hLsA&feature=related


Fifth Gear
"you should definitely put your name down for an R8"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=dJW3mbROXJQ


911 is an amazing car, but a V8 mid-engined platform is far superior to a 6-cylinder rear-engined platform. Porsche cannot be using the same platform forever, they have to evolve. If not, they will continue to be outperformed.
 
Old May 10, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #71  
USCCayman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 886
From: Florida
Rep Power: 63
USCCayman is a splendid one to beholdUSCCayman is a splendid one to beholdUSCCayman is a splendid one to beholdUSCCayman is a splendid one to beholdUSCCayman is a splendid one to beholdUSCCayman is a splendid one to beholdUSCCayman is a splendid one to beholdUSCCayman is a splendid one to behold
I like the idea of the Cayman with the 3.4L ALMS motor. They could offer two engine choices, NA and forced induction. By the way, the 3.4L ALMS is a V8, not horizontally opposed. Seen it with my own eyes at Rennsport Reunion III and St. Pete Grand Prix. But, don't take my word for it, Google it. It is one heck of a motor mated to a sequential gearbox. Man, a Cayman with a twin turbo 3.4L ALMS motor would be a rocket! It also seems like a whole lot of development for something they aren't gonna use. I bet we see it in a road car before long. With the new CAFE standards, that would be the better way to go. Light car with small TT motor. Nobody does it better than Porsche!
 

Last edited by USCCayman; May 10, 2008 at 11:41 AM.
Old May 10, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #72  
UBoat Commander's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,801
From: Los Angeles, CA
Rep Power: 97
UBoat Commander is just really niceUBoat Commander is just really niceUBoat Commander is just really niceUBoat Commander is just really niceUBoat Commander is just really nice
Originally Posted by Tuskir
I know nothing about Porsche? What rock have you been living under? Every single comparison that Audi R8 was put against a 911, it won. Just to name a few:

Car and Driver
997 turbo VS Audi R8
R8= 1st place
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...st+page-4.html


Motor Trend
997 4S vs Audi R8
R8 = 1st place
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._dynamics.html


Top Gear
"R8 is a better car"
Audi R8= 1:24.4
911 S = 1:26.2
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zI8ChK3xQDs&feature=related
^ That is 2 seconds per lap faster "dude", which is a huge difference in performance.

DrivenMag.com
"R8 is superior"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JTgtHb3hLsA&feature=related


Fifth Gear
"you should definitely put your name down for an R8"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=dJW3mbROXJQ


911 is an amazing car, but a V8 mid-engined platform is far superior to a 6-cylinder rear-engined platform. Porsche cannot be using the same platform forever, they have to evolve. If not, they will continue to be outperformed.

Wow, how come every single video of 997 vs. R8 on Youtube shows the 997 winning in every category? I guess in real life (not in loser car mags) the 997 is the better car. Sorry pal, but I'd rather live in the real world.
 
Old May 10, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #73  
Tuskir's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 633
From: Miami
Rep Power: 46
Tuskir has a spectacular aura aboutTuskir has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by UBoat Commander
Wow, how come every single video of 997 vs. R8 on Youtube shows the 997 winning in every category? I guess in real life (not in loser car mags) the 997 is the better car. Sorry pal, but I'd rather live in the real world.
Could you post a link to a video showing 997 beating a R8? I showed you five different independent sources showing R8 outperform a 997, you showed me zero. You can't get much real than a same day, same track, same professional driver (Stig, who knows the track better than anyone) run these cars back to back on track and R8 win by two seconds. Almost everyone who has driven both cars preferred the mid-engined layout of the R8. Have you even driven the R8? I'm guessing not....
 
Old May 10, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #74  
Spyderidol's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 116
From: Mozambique
Rep Power: 23
Spyderidol is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by cdaniels
The ALMS Porsche 3.4 8 cylinder is a flat 8 meaning the cylinders are horizonally opposed ....just like a Ferrari engine..the purpose is to keep weight and the center of gravity as low as possible....and yes Porsche has made aircraft engines as well......tanks, tractors, etc....
I take it you are referring to the RS Spyder. It does not have a flat 8, but rather a V8.

http://www.porsche.com/uk/motorsport...ogyandconcept/
 
Old May 10, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #75  
cdaniels's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 304
From: Cary, NC
Rep Power: 33
cdaniels is infamous around these parts
Cool Stand corrected...I hate when that happens....

Looks like I stand corrected...you can't beat documentation from Porsche herself...I'm just surprised...I would have thought a boxer engine with hoziontally opposed cylinders would have a lower center of gravity there fore be better.....oh well...I've only been an automotive engineer for 2 weeks since I got my certificate off the internet....


Originally Posted by Spyderidol
I take it you are referring to the RS Spyder. It does not have a flat 8, but rather a V8.

http://www.porsche.com/uk/motorsport...ogyandconcept/
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 AM.