Aston Martin DB7, DB9, DBS, Vantage V8, Vanquish, and Classic models

New Product!!!! V8 Vantage Performance Catalysts for Late Model Cars

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2013 | 06:51 PM
  #16  
Breezman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 445
From: Malibu,Ca ~ Jacksonville,Org
Rep Power: 32
Breezman is infamous around these partsBreezman is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
I'm assuming by exact differences you mean power gains? I have not had the chance to gather data on these as a stand-alone mod, but based on my experience with the earlier cars, and the V12 engined cars changing the secondaries, I think 10-12BHP would be a fair estimate.
Thanks. i did mean what are all the differences as to why i would want to go thru the expense to have this installed in my car
 
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 10:53 AM
  #17  
007 Vantage's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,765
From: USA
Rep Power: 98
007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Stuart@VelocityAP
The high-flow cats on the later models make less HP, you're only replacing the secondaries. The reason the earlier setup is better is because the cat-less headers, and the downstream 200 cell single primary catalysts are already developed and on the market. I supposed you could develop a header with the cat integrated into it, and a test-pipe downstream from that, but you would be severely compromised in the header design due to the need to locate the single catalyst there.

There's no need to reinvent the wheel. There is a reason even the late model GT4 cars use the same setup as this (albeit still with the poorly designed OEM manifolds.)
I see, then how is the V8VS making 15 more HP than the non S models with these newer more restrictive manifolds and extra cats? Just curious where those gains are coming from given more restrictive exhaust system.
 
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 01:02 PM
  #18  
Stuart@VelocityAP's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Basic Sponsor
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,642
From: Canada
Rep Power: 121
Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !Stuart@VelocityAP Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 007 Vantage
I see, then how is the V8VS making 15 more HP than the non S models with these newer more restrictive manifolds and extra cats? Just curious where those gains are coming from given more restrictive exhaust system.
Nobody is saying that the late model Manifolds+Cats is any more or less restrictive than the early model Manifolds+Cats. If there is a difference it is infinitesimal.

What is being said is that because the primary and secondary catalysts are now separated on the late model cars, with the primaries being located in the manifolds, you will not see the same results from changing JUST the secondary cats on the late model cars that you would from changing the primary+secondary integral cats on the early ones. Hence, the gains to be had from changing the manifolds on the later model car are larger than they are on an early one, and the gains from changing JUST the cats are smaller. The overall benefit of changing BOTH at the same time is more or less unchanged.

You asked why not make manifolds for the late model cars? You could, but why develop and engineer a whole new part when you can fit the cat-less header that fits to the early cars, combine it with the 200 cell cats that fit these cars and relocate the O2 sensors with a harness extension?

The only reason to develop a whole new manifold would be if you thought someone would be interested in changing the manifold on a late model car, but keeping the stock secondaries, or fitting test pipes in place of the stock secondaries. Which IMHO would be crazy. You would have to compromise the header design to include a catalyst + O2 bosses, the header would be much more expensive and then you would put test pipes in afterwards. You need a 200 cell cat in there somewhere to keep emissions within the acceptable parameters, why try to squish it in in front of the header flange when you can just put it behind, where the secondaries are now and build a great header?

So if you don't want to change the header, these new secondaries are a nice easy bolt on. But if you're serious about performance, fitting the already existing Velocity headers + 200 cell cats as designed for the earlier model cars is the way to go!
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
Velocity Automotive Performance Limited
206 Maple Avenue
Oliver, BC
Canada V2A 4W6
Office: (1)250-485-5126
www.velocityap.com
Old Jun 9, 2013 | 10:07 PM
  #19  
007 Vantage's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,765
From: USA
Rep Power: 98
007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of
Oh ok cool, thanks for the clarification
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PorscheEnthusiast
Automobiles For Sale
2
Nov 13, 2015 02:23 PM
PelicanParts.com
Mini Cooper Vendor Classifieds
3
Sep 1, 2015 02:36 PM
vividracing
997 Turbo / GT2
8
Aug 21, 2015 06:34 AM
ModBargains
Tesla Motors Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 20, 2015 12:28 PM
vividracing
Nissan GTR
0
Aug 19, 2015 02:11 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:59 AM.