Aston Martin DB7, DB9, DBS, Vantage V8, Vanquish, and Classic models

To Remap or Not To Remap! peoples opinions please!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 11:09 PM
  #1  
Jibberingloon's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 43
From: Oxfordshire
Rep Power: 14
Jibberingloon is infamous around these parts
To Remap or Not To Remap! peoples opinions please!



So if you change to 200 cell cats should you do a remap?

Or if you then do Manifold / Headers and 200 cell cats should you do a remap?


Will you get benefits from just the hardware without a software update?

Does the ECU have a little give with fueling and timing etc? Surely it does?


What are peoples opinions and what results have you achieved?

Thanks

Mark
 
Old Sep 8, 2017 | 03:30 PM
  #2  
Redpants's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,992
From: Tampa, FL
Rep Power: 358
Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !Redpants Is a GOD !
I think high-flow cats and a tune are the best bang-for-your buck mods you can do. For the 4.3L cars, I think it's a must-do mod to get the performance the factory should have given them.
 
Old Sep 9, 2017 | 02:58 AM
  #3  
Mansfield's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 0
Mansfield is infamous around these parts
Like yourself, I have fitted 200 cell cats.

Before fitting I did some research to see if it would be required for an ecu upgrade.

Rich is better informed here and can probably correct me if wrong but....

To answer one of your questions (does the standard ecu adjust) the ecu fitted to the V8 Vantage reads the knock sensors and reduces or advances detonation accordingly.
This is to compensate for various fuel octane levels, the quoted power of 380bhp (on the 4.3 litre) being acheived at 97 octane fuel (uk rating).

Therefore running higher octane fuel should result in more power and likewise running less the ecu will adjust without damage to your engine at reduced power. In the link below a figure of 3.75bhp/octane of fuel is mentioned although not totally linear.

Here in germany 102 octane is freely available.

That said I'm sure an ecu flash/upgrade will also see improved results but is not a necessesity.

I would also be interrested to see rolling road results to see if an ecu/reflash would be worthwhile.

Here is the thread for the information above and makes interresting reading (3rd post down)

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/...&t=978848&i=60
 

Last edited by Mansfield; Sep 9, 2017 at 03:06 AM.
Old Sep 9, 2017 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
spinecho's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 843
From: pluto
Rep Power: 59
spinecho is a splendid one to beholdspinecho is a splendid one to beholdspinecho is a splendid one to beholdspinecho is a splendid one to beholdspinecho is a splendid one to beholdspinecho is a splendid one to beholdspinecho is a splendid one to beholdspinecho is a splendid one to behold
Not to go off on a tangent, but...

The Pistonheads post is indeed interesting reading and I have to confess to not having perused all 93 pages (!), but the usual misinformation about "low grade fuel in the US" appears to be regurgitated on the first page, by someone who should know better.

Bamford Mike describes 91 octane fuel in the US as "low grade" yet this is an AKI rating, which is equivalent to about 95 or 96 octane RON in UK/Europe.

A 97 RON fuel would be equivalent to North American (AKI) 92 or 93 octane, which is readily available in many parts of the US and Canada.

Your 102 octane fuel in Germany (presumably RON) would be equivalent to, or slightly better than 94 octane AKI, which is readily available in my part of Canada; not sure about the US, though.
 
Old Sep 9, 2017 | 05:43 PM
  #5  
blue2000s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 984
From: Issaquah, WA
Rep Power: 61
blue2000s is a jewel in the roughblue2000s is a jewel in the roughblue2000s is a jewel in the rough
The Vantage, like most modern cars, uses a MAF to monitor airflow into the engine and therefore determine the fuel to be metered accordingly. These types of systems are generally very tolerant of normally aspirated intake and exhaust modifications because any changes in volumetric efficiency are automatically compensated by the MAF system. Provided that you don't mess with the intake near the MAF so it's readings are still accurate. So, like the vast majority of cars with MAF based systems, you don't need to tune with your modifications.

Now, the question you should be asking is do you WANT to tune. The throttle response dialed into the stock engine is not inline with what it should be (IMO) for a sports car. Likewise, the engine is conservatively tuned, which can help to ensure engine longevity at the cost of torque generation. Things like overly retarded timing and somewhat rich mixtures help to keep exhaust temperatures lower and generally protect the car from an inattentive or overly agressive owner or other external possibilities. VelocityAP and others generally offer canned tunes that are still safe but less so and noticeably wake up the engine. I am extremely impressed with my VAP tune. It's the only power modification I've made to my car (which admittedly started with the factory power pack) and the only one I plan to do. So IMO, you should WANT to tune.
 

Last edited by blue2000s; Sep 9, 2017 at 05:46 PM.
Old Sep 10, 2017 | 08:12 PM
  #6  
TJ851's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0
TJ851 is infamous around these parts
Thumbs up

The ECU remap was the best mod I did to my 07 V8V. I put on the VAP headers, 200 cell cats and the ECU tune and the car came alive. Throttle response was much better- It finally drove like a sports car. Before doing the remap, it was so tame compared to my BMW M3. Aston apparently limits how much throttle is applies in 1st and 2nd gear (?). Note - these changes also add considerable exhaust cacophony, which I like.
My ECU tune was customized by VAP to my car.
 
Old Sep 12, 2017 | 02:22 PM
  #7  
007 Vantage's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,765
From: USA
Rep Power: 98
007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of007 Vantage has much to be proud of
To remap just for the cats, no not necessary. But if you get headers for sure better to get a full dyno retune.

Go with Eurocharged, you will absolutely love their tune, best money I ever spent on my Aston.
 
Old Sep 12, 2017 | 08:03 PM
  #8  
blue2000s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 984
From: Issaquah, WA
Rep Power: 61
blue2000s is a jewel in the roughblue2000s is a jewel in the roughblue2000s is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by 007 Vantage
But if you get headers for sure better to get a full dyno retune.
It's still not necessary. As I said, the MAF compensates for VE changes due to bolt-ons.
 



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 AM.