A Decades Apart.
For some reason I truly dispise the f50. Maybe its too curvy for me, but it doesn't create the same emotions of the sculpted 288 and f40.
So
1. Enzo- fastest, most advanced (obviously), and I do like its design.
2. 288 GTO - love the looks, doesn't have the aero of the f40 but most everything else is the same. It reminds me more of the old school f-cars.
3. F40- who would think this car could be third on any list haha.
4. f430/599/360cs/ any other GTO
5 That darn f50, it just doesn't do it for me.
Now owning all four would certainly be an accomplishment. the last four decades of Ferrari supercars in your garage, I can only imagine!
So
1. Enzo- fastest, most advanced (obviously), and I do like its design.
2. 288 GTO - love the looks, doesn't have the aero of the f40 but most everything else is the same. It reminds me more of the old school f-cars.
3. F40- who would think this car could be third on any list haha.
4. f430/599/360cs/ any other GTO
5 That darn f50, it just doesn't do it for me.
Now owning all four would certainly be an accomplishment. the last four decades of Ferrari supercars in your garage, I can only imagine!
Since i am to disregard price, I would go with all 4.
Having to pick only one; I would go with the F40 for sure, however if the Enzo were black with a Saddle interior, I would have a different pick. I would love a black Enzo.
Having to pick only one; I would go with the F40 for sure, however if the Enzo were black with a Saddle interior, I would have a different pick. I would love a black Enzo.
I would go for the F50, enzo then F40. Don't think i will buy the 288 gto at all.
Last edited by Kuzi; Jan 18, 2008 at 01:16 PM.
Why 2 SC when they are exactly the same just in different color other than "because he/I can" or "Because he/I can afford to"
All of the above..............and because I wanted CSs for my "Twins".





Screw that paddle shift, traction control bs.