SIX C-GT's on ebay right now.
Honored Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 334
From: Cincinnati, USA
Rep Power: 36
Re: SIX C-GT's on ebay right now.
Originally posted by SteveH
that's right 6 of them!! draw your own conclusions
i'm gonna start saving my 300 grand to buy one in a year
that's right 6 of them!! draw your own conclusions
i'm gonna start saving my 300 grand to buy one in a year
Seems to me that the early guys will try to flip one at a profit and then buy a later allocation with some new options which will be available for MY 2005/2006. Why would anyone seek to lose money on the deal?
I think it will be quite a while until it drops to $300k, that's the price of a loaded Murci. With the high production numbers it'll likely get there, but I bet 4-5 yrs+
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,392
From: Way back in, New Zealand
Rep Power: 85
i'm hearing:
- hard to daily drive due to small clutch and scraping everyhwere
-hard to service w/o hours
and i think it's ugly, altho' not as ugly as an SLR [the worst] or an Enzo.
300 is possible.... but running costs will still be very high
- hard to daily drive due to small clutch and scraping everyhwere
-hard to service w/o hours
and i think it's ugly, altho' not as ugly as an SLR [the worst] or an Enzo.
300 is possible.... but running costs will still be very high
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,414
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 370
Originally posted by watt
i'm hearing:
- hard to daily drive due to small clutch and scraping everyhwere
i'm hearing:
- hard to daily drive due to small clutch and scraping everyhwere
-Steve
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,166
From: here
Rep Power: 150
"but i have a tough time believing it is more prone to scraping than a GT2."
it is because while ride heights are similar, the distance from the front of the car to the front of the tire is much longer on the CGT.
it is because while ride heights are similar, the distance from the front of the car to the front of the tire is much longer on the CGT.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,392
From: Way back in, New Zealand
Rep Power: 85
Originally posted by ben, lj
"but i have a tough time believing it is more prone to scraping than a GT2."
it is because while ride heights are similar, the distance from the front of the car to the front of the tire is much longer on the CGT.
"but i have a tough time believing it is more prone to scraping than a GT2."
it is because while ride heights are similar, the distance from the front of the car to the front of the tire is much longer on the CGT.
actual authority, the Porsche western VP, has told me himself how bad CGT's scrape, regardless of what ones believes in the absence of actual knowledge
Banned for Life
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,097
From: Texas
Rep Power: 148
[QUOTE]Originally posted by watt
[B]i'm hearing:
- hard to daily drive due to small clutch and scraping everyhwere
-hard to service w/o hours
and i think it's ugly, altho' not as ugly as an SLR [the worst] or an Enzo.
Are u crazy
[B]i'm hearing:
- hard to daily drive due to small clutch and scraping everyhwere
-hard to service w/o hours
and i think it's ugly, altho' not as ugly as an SLR [the worst] or an Enzo.
Are u crazy
Porsche Fiend
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,875
From: Malibu, CA
Rep Power: 139
Depending on where you live, GT2 does scrape in many places, especially driveways. You can only go angle the car in so much...
CGT is definitely worse because of its overhang, but then again, I'd love to have one anyway.
I know of a guy who drives his almost daily. Now, that is a stud.
CGT is definitely worse because of its overhang, but then again, I'd love to have one anyway.
I know of a guy who drives his almost daily. Now, that is a stud.
