GT3/GT2 Performance and Track Discussion on the Porsche GT3 and GT2

Tuning done real results on the GT3

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #16  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
Originally posted by PorschePhD
Ok, so someone might and it won't be me. In order to appreciate why the car wouldn't be a good candidate for a SC you would need to see the maps of the car. There are many reasons why the car would not be a great setup from a motor stand point. Running THAT motor at 14:1 (rough estimate on raised CR at 6psi) would not last long at all. Just my opinion.
The effective compression ratio of the GT3 engine with 6 psi of boost would be much higher than 14:1. It would be 16.5:1 which is less than I am currently running and less than the effective compression ratio of the Turbo.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 10:13 AM
  #17  
PorschePhd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,670
Rep Power: 189
PorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond repute
The programs of the turbo and the cells are far different than that of a GT3. They can not be compared.

A rough estimate without all the numbers is for every 3psi you raise the CR 1 point.

I am sure this is a subject we agree we will disagree.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 10:19 AM
  #18  
PorschePhd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,670
Rep Power: 189
PorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond repute
oops sorry I meant 2. Not sure where the three came from. That wold put you art 15 or so.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #19  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
Formula for calculating the effective CR is as follows:

((Boost Pressure / 14.7) + 1) x Static CR = Effective CR
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #20  
PorschePhd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,670
Rep Power: 189
PorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond repute
1 psi =.5 point CR( effective CR)
1 point CR=2 psi (cylinder pressure.)
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 10:46 AM
  #21  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
Originally posted by PorschePhD
1 psi =.5 point CR( effective CR)
1 point CR=2 psi (cylinder pressure.)

The formula i showed above is correct way to determine effective CR.. YOu cannot simply add .5 to the static CR to determine the effective CR. It works for a static CR of 8, but nothing else. As the static CR increase, so does the effect of boost as a percentage, on the effective CR.

Example: A static CR of 8 plus 1 psi boost will add .54
A static CR of 10 plus 1 psi boost will add .68
A static CR of 11 plus 1 psi boost will add .75

That is a HUGE difference from simply adding .5 for every 1 psi of boost. With 6 psi on an 11:1 engine, you would be off 1.5:1 on what the actual effective CR is. Screw up your timing settings and mapping based on that info and you're risking engine trouble.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #22  
Holger B's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,093
From: SF
Rep Power: 66
Holger B is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by 1999Porsche911
The CR is not too high for 6 psi of boost and not all people track their GT3. I suspect we will see one before too long. What a beast that will be. You have to remember that driving a properly SC'ed car does not change the handling at all. The SC is only functional at or near WOT at which time the power is extremely smooth and linear as well as predictable. I guess we will have to wait and see if Todd has one in the works.
Maybe you should drive a GT3, then get back to us on whether it needs a SC.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #23  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
I drive a GT3 (actually 2 different ones) at least once a week, Just returned from a 700 mile trip in one last week. I agree that the GT3 (although less powerfull than my SC 996) is a great car and handlles great. The higher revs are great. I love it!

However, the discussion has turned to whether it could handle a blower and whether or not that would hurt the performance of the car. I take the stand that it would not hurt the perfomance in anyway and that a blower would make it one of the fastest Porsche'd on the road with everyday drivability.

But, we each have out own opinion.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #24  
Holger B's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,093
From: SF
Rep Power: 66
Holger B is infamous around these parts
The only people on this thread that I see advocating a blown GT3 are those that don't own one. Looks like the people that actually have one don't see the need for a SC, hence no one offering a blower kit for the GT3.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #25  
PorschePhd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,670
Rep Power: 189
PorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond repute
Yes, I know the formulas, obviously. As I said, these were ROUGH estimates and meant to give those reading this thread an average guide line to go by. Nevertheless this thread has gotten off track.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #26  
1999Porsche911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,134
From: Chicagoland
Rep Power: 123
1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future1999Porsche911 has a brilliant future
So, you assume that because some do not list all their family cars that they don't own them? Some of us like to display less pomposity than do others.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #27  
Holger B's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,093
From: SF
Rep Power: 66
Holger B is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by 1999Porsche911
So, you assume that because some do not list all their family cars that they don't own them? Some of us like to display less pomposity than do others.
Are you describing yourself or someone else in the above post?

1999 Artic Silver C2 Supercharged
20% SSK
GT3 Aero Kit
Full Leather Interior
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #28  
rockitman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,351
From: New York
Rep Power: 298
rockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond reputerockitman has a reputation beyond repute
Originally posted by PorschePhD
Nevertheless this thread has gotten off track.
Yes it has...
Anyone who super/turbo charges a GT3 motor is crazy, not well informed and completely misses the point of this car as it was originally designed by Porsche....imo
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 12:56 PM
  #29  
Holger B's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,093
From: SF
Rep Power: 66
Holger B is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by rockitman
Yes it has...
Anyone who super/turbo charges a GT3 motor is crazy, not well informed and completely misses the point of this car as it was originally designed by Porsche....imo
Agreed. That's called a GT2.
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #30  
PMac's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,000
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 108
PMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to beholdPMac is a splendid one to behold
Originally posted by Hamann7
Oh my god... I can't believe one would even think about supercharging a GT3 motor. That is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard.

While you're at it, why don't you add a wet Nitrous system too?

And some neon lighting underneath the car, and some 12" subs to have a FAST AND FURIOUS GT3.
Damn, you're a *****
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:29 PM.