tt S vs 2012 GT-R
tt S vs 2012 GT-R
I'm not sure anyone here wants to hear this but the reviews on the new Nissan are quite good. The stats earily similar- 530 hp, awd, double clutch tranny making for sub 3 sec 0-60 runs that are repeatable and covered by the warranty. Only big difference is the price- 1/2 as much. For those of us where 170 K isn't small change...
Jim
Jim
I'm not sure anyone here wants to hear this but the reviews on the new Nissan are quite good. The stats earily similar- 530 hp, awd, double clutch tranny making for sub 3 sec 0-60 runs that are repeatable and covered by the warranty. Only big difference is the price- 1/2 as much. For those of us where 170 K isn't small change...
Jim
Jim
I can't speak for owners here, but I bought my S less for the numbers but more for the feel and look of the 911. An impossible childhood dream come true!!
Same concept, but I don't recall any discussions here between the Turbo S and 2012 GT-R.
I think these two are very closely matched, no?
Both 0-60: ~2.9 secs ... GT-R 2.8secs Turbo S 3.1 (as advertised, actual time, I believe, was either 2.9 or 3.0 for the Turbo S).
Both DCT
Both AWD
Both Top speed 196mph
Both 530HP
I mean, how much more equal can you get?
I think these two are very closely matched, no?
Both 0-60: ~2.9 secs ... GT-R 2.8secs Turbo S 3.1 (as advertised, actual time, I believe, was either 2.9 or 3.0 for the Turbo S).
Both DCT
Both AWD
Both Top speed 196mph
Both 530HP
I mean, how much more equal can you get?
Wasn't regular turbo getting 2.8 with PDK?
Road and Track tested the 2011 911 Turbo S.
0-60 in 2.6 sec
0-100 in 6.3 sec
10.7 @ 128.9 1/4 mile
Results:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezfl...059e7c3413.pdf
Article:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/ca...he-power-of-12
So there, turbo s wins
Road and Track tested the 2011 911 Turbo S.
0-60 in 2.6 sec
0-100 in 6.3 sec
10.7 @ 128.9 1/4 mile
Results:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezfl...059e7c3413.pdf
Article:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/ca...he-power-of-12
So there, turbo s wins
Trending Topics
Wasn't regular turbo getting 2.8 with PDK?
Road and Track tested the 2011 911 Turbo S.
0-60 in 2.6 sec
0-100 in 6.3 sec
10.7 @ 128.9 1/4 mile
Results:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezfl...059e7c3413.pdf
Article:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/ca...he-power-of-12
So there, turbo s wins
Road and Track tested the 2011 911 Turbo S.
0-60 in 2.6 sec
0-100 in 6.3 sec
10.7 @ 128.9 1/4 mile
Results:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezfl...059e7c3413.pdf
Article:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/ca...he-power-of-12
So there, turbo s wins

Nevermind. I was going off of Porsche's claimed time along with another review. I think the Nissan's best is only 2.88 (or something like that). I didn't see this as a win/lose thing (I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings). For those of you that need it - 2.6 seems quite fast.
As for me, I am really glad Porsche was notably intimidated by the original GT-R which motivated them to improve their 911 TT-S stats. Now we see that drivers of both automobiles have won!
Sorry if I posted to the wrong forum. I was wondering if I forgot to hit the submit button. I did not even know ther was a GT-R forum.
Jim
Jim
Actually I wish this was still in the GT2 997 Turbo forum as it is much better visited, And I was indeed looking to stir up a little controversy, but more specifically get the opinions of people who had driven or ridden in both.
Jim
Jim
never one to add to these post but the fact is, a Porsche will always have value. in fact, if a Porsche is in great shape its worth can be 30k plus many decades after. yes that nissan is a fast car, but Porsche is personality type, not just a fast car. in ten years that nissan will be worth 15-20k max. nissan will never have the prestige of any porsche, never.. and 100k is not cheap.... just my 10 cents... but that car is fast!!!




imma grab me some snickers while im at it.