Installed Cobb Stage II and BY-Design Intercoolers
Agree. The 1/8 mile trap seems slower than stock. If this the same car I think it is, it was faster with the GIAC tune when I raced it back in May.
If OP is not the car In the first race of the vid below, then I apologize and will leave the thread. But I think it is. If you look at the first 4 races, OP does a decent job of keeping up with me. Then I run heads up with a built/upgraded turbo 703 wheel GTR and decimate an SLS BS and Ferrari F12. Those are indicators that I'm making well north of 600 wheel. OP must have been making somewhere in the 530-540 wheel range to keep it relatively close. The GTR is a very well documented car owned by Raphael and has lots of dynos to prove the mods/power.
Here you go:
Longboarder's Turbo S NoFlyZone 6 May 2, 2015 Race Compilation - YouTube
If OP is not the car In the first race of the vid below, then I apologize and will leave the thread. But I think it is. If you look at the first 4 races, OP does a decent job of keeping up with me. Then I run heads up with a built/upgraded turbo 703 wheel GTR and decimate an SLS BS and Ferrari F12. Those are indicators that I'm making well north of 600 wheel. OP must have been making somewhere in the 530-540 wheel range to keep it relatively close. The GTR is a very well documented car owned by Raphael and has lots of dynos to prove the mods/power.
Here you go:
Longboarder's Turbo S NoFlyZone 6 May 2, 2015 Race Compilation - YouTube
Originally Posted by longboarder
Agree. The 1/8 mile trap seems slower than stock. If this the same car I think it is, it was faster with the GIAC tune when I raced it back in May.
If OP is not the car In the first race of the vid below, then I apologize and will leave the thread. But I think it is. If you look at the first 4 races, OP does a decent job of keeping up with me. Then I run heads up with a built/upgraded turbo 703 wheel GTR and decimate an SLS BS and Ferrari F12. Those are indicators that I'm making well north of 600 wheel. OP must have been making somewhere in the 530-540 wheel range to keep it relatively close. The GTR is a very well documented car owned by Raphael and has lots of dynos to prove the mods/power.
Here you go:
If OP is not the car In the first race of the vid below, then I apologize and will leave the thread. But I think it is. If you look at the first 4 races, OP does a decent job of keeping up with me. Then I run heads up with a built/upgraded turbo 703 wheel GTR and decimate an SLS BS and Ferrari F12. Those are indicators that I'm making well north of 600 wheel. OP must have been making somewhere in the 530-540 wheel range to keep it relatively close. The GTR is a very well documented car owned by Raphael and has lots of dynos to prove the mods/power.
Here you go:
@ 00:42 in the video you can see a still shot of how/where he mounts the gopros. Rear window facing forward and front windshield facing rear
Yes I'd agree the car is not where I'd like it to be power wise. I'm down approx. 30-40 hp from stage II comparisons which I'm running now on 91 pump gas. What is important is the delta between where I was and where I am currently in the new tune as the dyno data clearly shows. Im confident the numbers will get extremely better and wouldn't be naive to think there is any limitation between having the words Turbo or Turbo S on the back of my bumper.
Will make a few bolt on changes to determine the problem and find what the car likes. Have a suspicion and will go with what is determined from the data logs and dyno. I'll test and change a Part or two next week with a return to the Dyno for tuning.
Last edited by White991TT; Oct 2, 2015 at 08:24 AM.
To remain on topic ...
Yes I'd agree the car is not where Id like it to be power wise. I'm down approx. 30-40 hp from stage II comparisons which I'm running now on 91 pump gas. Will make a few bolt on changes to determine the problem and find what the car likes. Have a suspicion and will go with what was determined from the data logs and dyno. I'll test and change a Part or two next week with a return to the Dyno for tuning.
Yes I'd agree the car is not where Id like it to be power wise. I'm down approx. 30-40 hp from stage II comparisons which I'm running now on 91 pump gas. Will make a few bolt on changes to determine the problem and find what the car likes. Have a suspicion and will go with what was determined from the data logs and dyno. I'll test and change a Part or two next week with a return to the Dyno for tuning.
Also, did you guys data-log the car during the run with the GIAC software?
Unfortunately no, did not have the opportunity or ability to data log with GIAC.
Thanks for clarifying. What part is it? Why the secrecy? lol
No secrecy, but as with all high level national security investigations, to protect the innocent, we will not reveal data prior to confirmation. LOL
I'm sure you guys are probably already doing this, but try throwing the OEM DVs in. Should be able to troubleshoot easier with the logs at your fingertips. I hope you get it sorted.
Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
Thanks for clarifying. What part is it? Why the secrecy? lol
1. Our October 7th Atco rental day; and
2. Slipstream's Oct 17th roll races at Pocono.
3. The upcoming ShiftSector event in California.
I am in numbers 1 and 2with RedGutz. Hope to see as many Cobb tuned cars as possible.
If the Cobb torque claims are to be believed a stage 2 Cobb tuned car with stock ICs should be as fast or faster than my GIAC Stage 2 plus tune car with Champion ICs. Let's see if some of these amazing Dyno runs are proven in the real world.
Time to GoPro up and record for the Porsche world to see.
The main premise of this thread was to prove that your newly acquired Cobb software outperformed your previously installed GIAC software in a dyno test. Yet at the same time we're saying that there's a problematic part installed on the car holding it back. So to me, the only thing that we've successfully proven at this point is that the GIAC software is more sensitive to the issues being caused by whatever this mysterious hardware part is. Not to mention the less-then-optimal conditions under which the dyno testing was performed (i.e. lack of rpm signal or data-log during the GIAC run) which technically would make it impossible to plot a TQ curve, yet you have a pretty clearly plotted TQ shown. The whole thing is a bit confusing, to be honest.
Here is what I was basing my comments on:
Originally Posted by White991TT
Here is a list of mods:
Before:
Giac Stage II 91 Tune
IPD Y Pipe
IPD Plenum
EVOMS Diverter Valves
Before:
Giac Stage II 91 Tune
IPD Y Pipe
IPD Plenum
EVOMS Diverter Valves
I raced OP and got him by a car length at this same event, I raced this black PP Perfornance 991 and he got me by a little over a car length I believe he was running meth but can't confirm. I also raced longboarder and he got me by about 3 cars, I also had a passenger on all my runs ( black 991 had passenger as well )I'm hopping to close that gap by a lot at shift sector, with my new tune and IC'




