991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

USB thumb drive load time

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 11:04 AM
  #1  
nleeumd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 21
From: Washington, DC
Rep Power: 0
nleeumd is infamous around these parts
USB thumb drive load time

Anyone else have issue with mp3s on a thumb drive taking a few minutes to load each time you start the car? I have a 32GB scan disk thumb drive. it seems to take a few minutes to load the music to be able to press 'Track List' to scroll through the music.
 
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 12:30 PM
  #2  
damon@tirerack's Avatar
Moderator
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,962
From: South Bend, IN
Rep Power: 240
damon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond reputedamon@tirerack has a reputation beyond repute
I have had the same issue with the stereo in my truck. The key is to get a (good) thumb drive that has accelerated access times.
This one rocks. This one rocks.
Also, don't load the thing all the way up. The less you put on it, the faster it loads. If you only listen to 4 gig at a time of music, then just load that. You may have to reload it once in awhile to keep your selection fresh, but it loads MUCH faster that way.
 
__________________
damon@tirerack.com
877-522-8473 ext. 4643
574-287-2345 ext. 4643

**Don't forget to add my name to online orders!**

Or use this link:
http://www.tirerack.com/a.jsp?a=BH1&url=index.jsp
Old Oct 18, 2013 | 09:40 PM
  #3  
nleeumd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 21
From: Washington, DC
Rep Power: 0
nleeumd is infamous around these parts
Thanks, I purchased the really mini sandisk thumb drive, my have to reinvest into another one.
 
Old Oct 19, 2013 | 06:31 AM
  #4  
jster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 276
From: Houston
Rep Power: 38
jster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud of
If you want the fastest times to resume playing a track from where you left it, presenting the menus to you and using the search or playlist functions you should use an ipod. If you use a stick or hard drive damon is spot on regarding the more music you load the longer getting to all these functions takes. Additionally, if you use a really large stick or drive I have found that letting the system completely go thru completely indexing the media before shutting the car off is helpful. There will still be delay compared to an ipod but it will be faster than if the media was new/fresh.
 
Old Oct 20, 2013 | 02:39 PM
  #5  
Dominic in London's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 24
From: London UK
Rep Power: 0
Dominic in London is infamous around these parts
I spent ages trying to make USB sticks work. I got most of my library in 320k MP3s onto a 64GB stick, but it just took too long to load up, and I didn't see any benefit to ensuring it had fully loaded before switching off.

So with a heavy heart I went the ipod route. At least with a 160GB ipod I can get everything on, and my favourites are in higher resolution. Still, the itunes and the 'stealable gadget' of it all is a pain.

The ipod works brilliantly though.
 
Old Dec 18, 2013 | 01:14 PM
  #6  
Chiboy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
From: Hinsdale, IL
Rep Power: 16
Chiboy is infamous around these parts
I have previously read this thread and was looking for the Patriot Supersonic Rage flash drive recommended above by Damon. I see that buydig has them on sale -- the 64 GB is $42 and the 128 GB is $80. If I were to NOT fill the 128 GB one, perhaps putting 100 GB of music on there, would it load quickly, or is 128 GB (and maybe even 64 GB) just too big for reasonable loading times?
 
Old Dec 18, 2013 | 08:58 PM
  #7  
nleeumd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 21
From: Washington, DC
Rep Power: 0
nleeumd is infamous around these parts
Correct me if I am wrong, I think the way to go is to load music on an iPod Nano or Touch due to quicker load times vs UBS thumb drives.
 
Old Dec 19, 2013 | 05:26 AM
  #8  
jster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 276
From: Houston
Rep Power: 38
jster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud of
nleeummd-- As I understand it Chiboy was looking for 64GB or greater...the iPod Nano only goes to 16GB and costs $149; the iPod Touch will get there but for $399 vs a $42 stick. On the other hand, an iPod Classic is $249 for 160GB.

Chiboy-- the first time a stick loads the system has to build an index. That takes more or less time based on how much music you have. At some point, while still indexing, it will begin to play the first track of the first album. When that is done music is selectable but not searchable. It then builds that index. For 64GB I have had this process take anywhere between two and ten minutes (and I don't know why; perhaps based on how many processes the PCM is running). For $42 bucks I would try it and see if it is worth it to you and if not buy an Ipod Classic of whatever.
 
Old Dec 19, 2013 | 07:37 AM
  #9  
Chiboy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
From: Hinsdale, IL
Rep Power: 16
Chiboy is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by jster
nleeummd-- As I understand it Chiboy was looking for 64GB or greater...the iPod Nano only goes to 16GB and costs $149; the iPod Touch will get there but for $399 vs a $42 stick. On the other hand, an iPod Classic is $249 for 160GB.

Chiboy-- the first time a stick loads the system has to build an index. That takes more or less time based on how much music you have. At some point, while still indexing, it will begin to play the first track of the first album. When that is done music is selectable but not searchable. It then builds that index. For 64GB I have had this process take anywhere between two and ten minutes (and I don't know why; perhaps based on how many processes the PCM is running). For $42 bucks I would try it and see if it is worth it to you and if not buy an Ipod Classic of whatever.
Yeah, I think that is good advice. I don't care if it takes 10 minutes the first time. I do care if it takes 10 minutes every time I start the car.
 
Old Dec 19, 2013 | 12:25 PM
  #10  
MikeDi's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 66
From: Virginia
Rep Power: 15
MikeDi is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by damon@tirerack
I have had the same issue with the stereo in my truck. The key is to get a (good) thumb drive that has accelerated access times. This one rocks. Also, don't load the thing all the way up. The less you put on it, the faster it loads. If you only listen to 4 gig at a time of music, then just load that. You may have to reload it once in awhile to keep your selection fresh, but it loads MUCH faster that way.
Is the USB in our systems USB3.0 compatible?
 
Old Dec 19, 2013 | 03:45 PM
  #11  
jster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 276
From: Houston
Rep Power: 38
jster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud of
Usb 2.0
 
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 08:43 AM
  #12  
Chiboy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 81
From: Hinsdale, IL
Rep Power: 16
Chiboy is infamous around these parts
Late getting back to this....does this mean that in a 2012 991, there is no benefit to getting the well thought of Patriot Supersonic Rage XT 64GB USB 3.0 Flash Drive? Or is it still a faster flash drive than others, even if the 991 can't take advantage of the 3.0 speeds?
 
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 02:34 PM
  #13  
jster's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 276
From: Houston
Rep Power: 38
jster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud ofjster has much to be proud of
There may be some help on indexing speed if it is faster at 2.0 than your average bear. My experience with car systems is the limit exists on the head end (PCM) side (not the plug in USB side) as mfgs. typically spec fairly low end processors, memory, cache, etc. They are looking to provide basic functionality and save money/cut cost; not provide database building speed.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The_Ruski_Driver
Automobiles For Sale
12
Oct 25, 2015 08:40 PM
Rumrunner
Charity Notices/Events
0
Aug 20, 2015 11:07 AM
vividracing
996 Turbo / GT2
1
Aug 19, 2015 06:55 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 AM.